On 20/01/12 23:22, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On 27/09/11 19:59, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:56:02 +0100:
Hi all,
I didn't get any response to this, but did anything happen ?
Thanks,
Alan.
On 09/07/11 09:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Hi,
I'm building subver
On 27/09/11 19:59, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:56:02 +0100:
Hi all,
I didn't get any response to this, but did anything happen ?
Thanks,
Alan.
On 09/07/11 09:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Hi,
I'm building subversion 1.6.17 on a static library only syste
On 5 October 2011 16:08, Kalimuthu Samayan wrote:
> Hi,
> Having trouble in installing Subversion 1.6.17 rpm since it is looking
> for dependency library files like libapr-1.so, libaprutil-1.so and
> libneon.so. Is that any one give me the URL to download the subversion
> 1.6.17 installable.
>
> -
Alan Hourihane wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 20:12:09 +0100:
> On 09/27/11 19:59, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:56:02 +0100:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I didn't get any response to this, but did anything happen ?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Alan.
> >>
> >> On
On 09/27/11 19:59, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:56:02 +0100:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I didn't get any response to this, but did anything happen ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> On 09/07/11 09:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm building subversion 1.6.1
On 09/27/11 19:59, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:56:02 +0100:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I didn't get any response to this, but did anything happen ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> On 09/07/11 09:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm building subversion 1.6.1
Alan Hourihane wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:56:02 +0100:
> Hi all,
>
> I didn't get any response to this, but did anything happen ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan.
>
> On 09/07/11 09:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm building subversion 1.6.17 on a static library only system and
> > there
Hi all,
I didn't get any response to this, but did anything happen ?
Thanks,
Alan.
On 09/07/11 09:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building subversion 1.6.17 on a static library only system and
> there's some link problems.
>
> First is neon, it's link order is this
>
> -lz -lssl -lc
Around about 03/06/11 23:20, Nico Kadel-Garcia typed ...
Faster than than it was for .6.16 or earlier with the Linux client? Good
Yes, tested the new TSVN this morning on our standard codebase. A full
checkout last week on the old TSVN took just shy of 15 mins. (2-3 of its
dirs. have a
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Neil Bird wrote:
> Around about 03/06/11 03:46, Nico Kadel-Garcia typed ...
>>
>> And, apparently, the long-standing issue for clients with NTFS
>> filesystems sytems, issue #3719. I'm very much looking forward to
>> testing against a CIFS share, which was taking ea
Around about 03/06/11 03:46, Nico Kadel-Garcia typed ...
And, apparently, the long-standing issue for clients with NTFS
filesystems sytems, issue #3719. I'm very much looking forward to
testing against a CIFS share, which was taking easily 10 times as long
as checkouts on NFS shares.
The Linu
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Hyrum Wright wrote:
> I'm happy to announce Subversion 1.6.17, available from:
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/downloads/subversion-1.6.17.tar.bz2
> http://subversion.tigris.org/downloads/subversion-1.6.17.tar.gz
> http://subversion.tigris.org/downloads/su
Yes; I've taken the (controversial) step of removing the tag until we
create it properly.
Most entries should be found in the CHANGES files on trunk, but the
CHANGES files in the (signed) tarballs are authoritative.
Thomas Harold wrote on Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:42:15 -0400:
> On 6/1/2011 7:27 PM
On 6/1/2011 7:27 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Be advised: the 1.6.17 tag [1] in our repository does not match the
tarballs at the time of this writing. Until we fix this, please use the
tarballs or zip archives, and avoid installing 1.6.17 from the tag.
Daniel
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Hyrum Wright wrote on Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 20:06:43 +:
> I'm happy to announce Subversion 1.6.17, available from:
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/downloads/subversion-1.6.17.tar.bz2
> http://subversion.tigris.org/downloads/subversion-1.6.17.tar.gz
> http://subversion.tigris.org/do
Around about 27/04/11 05:09, Hyrum K. Wright typed ...
The bugfix has been merged to the 1.6.x branch, so that's the one to
be testing now:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x/
FWIW, 1.6.x now works for me on this issue (I had previously proven the
1.6.x-issue371 branch
> Ok, the 3rd vote is in, so the fix is all set for being backported.
> When 1.6.17 gets made, it should hop along ...
Hi Johan
Thanks very much for doing this review.
Best regards
David
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:18 AM, David Aldrich
>>> wrote:
>>>
> > I think there was mention on the developers list o
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:18 AM, David Aldrich
>> wrote:
>>
> I think there was mention on the developers list of releasing
> Subversion 1.6.17. I am interested in the im
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:18 AM, David Aldrich
> wrote:
>
>>> > I think there was mention on the developers list of releasing
>>> > Subversion 1.6.17. I am interested in the improvements to Windows
>>> > checkout.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Are you talk
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:18 AM, David Aldrich
wrote:
>> > I think there was mention on the developers list of releasing
>> > Subversion 1.6.17. I am interested in the improvements to Windows
>> > checkout.
>> >
>>
>> Are you talking about version 1.6.17 or version 1.7.x? I haven't seen
>> anyt
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Tscharner [mailto:andreas.tschar...@metromec.ch]
> Sent: 26 April 2011 12:17
> To: David Aldrich; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Subversion 1.6.17?
>
> > I think there was mention on the developers list of releasi
> I think there was mention on the developers list of releasing
> Subversion 1.6.17. I am interested in the improvements to
> Windows checkout.
>
Are you talking about version 1.6.17 or version 1.7.x? I haven't seen anything
about 1.6.17 here on the list, but there have been a few references on
David Aldrich wrote on Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:22:14 +0100:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andy Levy [mailto:andy.l...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 26 April 2011 11:13
> > To: David Aldrich
> > Cc: 'users@subversion.apache.org' (users@subversion.apache
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:22, David Aldrich wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andy Levy [mailto:andy.l...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 26 April 2011 11:13
>> To: David Aldrich
>> Cc: 'users@subversion.apache.org' (users@subversion.apache.org)
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Levy [mailto:andy.l...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 26 April 2011 11:13
> To: David Aldrich
> Cc: 'users@subversion.apache.org' (users@subversion.apache.org)
> Subject: Re: Subversion 1.6.17?
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:53, David Aldrich wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> I think there was mention on the developers list of releasing Subversion
> 1.6.17. I am interested in the improvements to Windows checkout.
>
>
>
> Any news on this please?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x
27 matches
Mail list logo
