First, we all know that tapestry is open source. But please don't forget
that a project cannot live without its simple users. You cannot simply
say that future users will outnumber the current users - first, you
cannot be sure and the most important is that potential future users
will think
Norbert Sándor wrote:
- rethink the IOC container of t5 (use hivemind 2.0 or maybe Spring
instead of a custom unsupported solution)
I also agree that we shouldn't have another IoC container. Spring is the
de facto standard. Either take Spring and work around missing features.
E.g. use naming
James,
Does your PagingQueryResult returned by your DAO by any chance wrap a Hibernate
Criteria? Later the Criteria methods setMaxResults(),
setFirstResult(), addOrder() and list()
are invoked from the HibernateTableModel on request?
Or where do you invoke the criteria (or similar) methods?
First of all, let me say that I don't appreciate the name-calling. I am not
personally attacking anyone here. I am a very active member of the open
source community and I too do it because I enjoy it. I enjoy working with
Tapestry and I believe that Tapestry is a very well-designed framework.
tapestry is a open source project.
before you requires others do or not do something, think what you have
done for it.
don't selfish
2006/7/30, Michael Echerer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Norbert Sándor wrote:
- rethink the IOC container of t5 (use hivemind 2.0 or maybe Spring
instead of a custom
Can you file this under JIRA Josh? I'm a little busy on other things today
but will be able to look at it and find a fix (if one is to be had) on
Monday.
On 7/30/06, Josh Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experiencing some issues with Tapestry 4.1 (the latest version from
maven).
First is
I really don't see what all the fuss is about anymore. I've already stated
that I'll be providing some form of T4 extension to upgrade to T5 when the
time comes for it.
I've been wanting some of the features in T5 almost since the first day I
started using Tapestry. I'm willing to go through the
liigo wrote:
tapestry is a open source project.
before you requires others do or not do something, think what you have
done for it.
don't selfish
It'll be selfish keeping my opinions for myself instead of sharing them.
I doubt this discussion aimed to be one about what open source is or
means.
Nice,
Now it would be great if some of the people who complain about lack of
stability actually helped in the migration path. I see some people who
are pretty old Tapestry users.
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Web Application Design and Programming
http://www.dtqsoftware.com
I would take a look at the new ResponseBuilder interface provided in 4.1.
Though it's still possible to do in tapestry 4, the new rendering logic
would make it very easy for you to capture the output of a page render and
do whatever you like with it.
It's also something you can control with a
Hi all,
I'm struggeling with validors. No matter what I do I just get the default **
as message.
I try to write it like this:
validators=validators:required[Please enter your name]
but I just get the default ** :(
I have also writte my own validators and they work - but not the custom
messages
Apologies for the delay (that whole sleeping thing got in the way) but
its done now:
TAPESTRY 1030 and TAPESTRY 1031 are the two issues' issue #s in JIRA.
Thanks again Jesse/Tapestry team,
Josh
On 7/30/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you file this under JIRA Josh? I'm a
Hi,
I use acegi for the authentication. Any ideas how would i handle different
start pages for different users?
thank you.
gant
In the dojo.validate.check
if ( profile.required instanceof Array ) {
When only one required validator,profile.required is object.
Jun Tsai
2006/7/31, Jun Tsai [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When in a form ,only one required validator.the dojo dialog can't be
shown.
ex:
?xml version=1.0
I find in JSONObject:
/**
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/
public JSONObject accumulate(String key, Object value)
{
JSONArray a;
Object o = opt(key);
if (o == null)
{
put(key, value);
}
else if (o instanceof JSONArray)
{
But I think that's the correct behaviour. Esp since it's coming directly
from json.org. Dojo got it wrong, I'll correct it tomorrow.
On 7/31/06, Jun Tsai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find in JSONObject:
/**
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/
public JSONObject accumulate(String key, Object
i forgot to mention that i am using tapestry 3.0.3.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
17 matches
Mail list logo
