Thanks everybody
I had a look at it. I feel tapestry is in need of a good eclipse plugin !!
Don't know much about writing a plugin but am considering it.. Something on
the lines of http://www.laughingpanda.org/mediawiki/index.php/Wicket_Bench
regards
Taha
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Evert
Thiago, I do want to make sure i disallow directory listings.
agree there is potential for bottleneck so I have changed to:
public boolean service(Request request, Response response,
RequestHandler handler) throws IOException
{
String path = request.getPath();
String co
Follow http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/TYNAMO-67. In the one
application I needed this, I'm still using tapestry-security 0.1.0
which allowed these type of contributions and was a separate and my
original effort at integrating jsecurity/shiro. There were a few other
interesting features and I'll me
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:24:39 -0200, Paul Stanton
wrote:
Yes tested and it works.
Yay! :)
I figured since I'm only executing the logic for things that start with
/asset/ctx/ the overhead shouldn't be noticeable, however on second
thought maybe this isn't a good idea?
There's a possibi
Yes tested and it works.
I create the real file so I can disallow all directory listings.
I could do this by testing for the (non)existence of a file extension,
however that isn't technically cross-platform etc...
so i create the file to test whether it's a directory, and disallow if
it is.
Whoops. We certainly wanted to make overriding possible
programmatically. I'm on it, didn't look into the code yet but if it
doesn't currently work I'll definitely fix it. Which version of
tapestry-security are you using?
Kalle
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:11 AM, anton.litvinenko
wrote:
>
> Hello!
There is Loom T5, it helps a little
http://code.google.com/p/loom-t5/
___
Everton Agner Ramos
2010/11/25 Guerin Laurent
> Hi Taha,
>
> This wiki link is very helpfull to get Component completion with parameters
> and description for TML files into Eclipse :
> http://wiki.a
Hi Taha,
This wiki link is very helpfull to get Component completion with parameters and
description for TML files into Eclipse :
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5JSPEditorEclipse
Cheers,
Laurent GUÉRIN
-Message d'origine-
De : Taha Hafeez [mailto:tawus.tapes...@gmail.com]
Env
Thanks
regards
Taha
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Inge Solvoll wrote:
> This one is very helpful for creating templates and switching between
> template and java. It's also pretty much the only useful T5 eclipse plugin.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/loom-t5/
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:49 PM
This one is very helpful for creating templates and switching between
template and java. It's also pretty much the only useful T5 eclipse plugin.
http://code.google.com/p/loom-t5/
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Taha Hafeez wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse.
>
> reg
Hi
Is there any good tapestry5 plugin for eclipse.
regards
Taha
Without doing it with callbacks and events, more simple for your use case :
you can define 2 input parameters like this in you component :
@Parameter(defaultPrefix = BindingConstants.LITERAL)
private String successPage;
@Parameter(defaultPrefix = BindingConstants.LITERAL)
private String errorPag
Hi !
Use events and callbacks, see ComponentResources.triggerEvent
2010/11/25 Tibo23
>
> How to tell the component from the beginning where to go? Because it
> depends
> on the parent page where the login component is included AND on a
> authentication fonction success?
>
> Here is my Login com
Borut beat me to it. If you use GMail to subscribe to the mailing
list and create a filter to automatically tag messages and move them
out of your inbox, then you practically end up with a personal forum
system. It works beautifully for every Apache mailing list I
subscribe to. GMail keeps it or
How to tell the component from the beginning where to go? Because it depends
on the parent page where the login component is included AND on a
authentication fonction success?
Here is my Login component :
public class Login {
@Inject
private IAuthenticationService authentication
Thanks Richard, I'll try that.
2010/11/25 Richard Hill
>
> Ok so, if I follow correctly:
>
> Page A: Doesn't have a form. So instead you have a normal link. This
> contains as url parameters the data to be sent. After processing you
> want to redirect to Page B. So you could do something like th
Hi, Katia!
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 06:13:48 -0200, Katia Aresti
wrote:
There are always several ways to do the same thing.
@Thiago Doing with events like this, does not come up to the same to same
thing ? In the end I have to catch the event on my page to decide where
to go. So, why not telli
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:03:03 -0200, Paul Stanton
wrote:
Thanks Thiago,
Hi!
AFAIK you don't need to check for the real file. Just checking the URL is
enough.
Besides this, I think it is ok. Have you tested it already?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5
Ok so, if I follow correctly:
Page A: Doesn't have a form. So instead you have a normal link. This
contains as url parameters the data to be sent. After processing you
want to redirect to Page B. So you could do something like this:
PageA.java:
@Inject
private Request request;
@Inject
private P
Thanks Richard for your response.
What I want is to do a post request but my page dosn't contain any form. The
user will be redirected to an URL with some parameters and after that I must
get some other parameters from the response.
I hope that is more clear now.
Thanks.
Can you be a little more explicit:
You want a GET request (instead of a POST) to trigger a redirect?
Does the original GET or the redirect contain url parameters? Or both?
Do either of them have an activation context?
-Original Message-
From: Gnu Ubuntu
Reply-to: "Tapestry users"
Hi!
I need to redirect user to an url with some parameters (simulate a post
without form).
Can you help me to do that, please ?
Thanks in advance.
I didn't mean to start an egg throwing contest with anyone, just thought
it was a good idea to bring up for discussion.
I appreciate all the comments and opinions, hopefully something comes of
it even if it's just a few more people monitoring the SO list.
I won't post again on the topic becau
If you register on the user mailing list with your google mail account and
create a filter on the mailbox, then you have the ultimate power of sorting
threads and searching the knowledge. It can not get better.
When I see a forum which has a search link which takes you to another page
where you ar
An interesting discussion.
However, while I do see that a forum would, perhaps, be initially more user
friendly for new people to join, in the end the creation of such a thing would
either divide the community into those on the ML and those on the forum, or at
worst the forum would end up with
To solve my issue, I've added a custom ant builder to Eclipse that copy the
target/classes folder to the target/myapp/WEB-INF/classes folder, and then
the tapestry hot reload of classes and resources works.
It works, but I have to trigger my custom builder manually with Ctrl-B
(build project), bec
But registering with StackOverflow or a forum is OK or what?
On 25.11.2010 10:19, Paul Stanton wrote:
"I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing lists.
"
you are missing the point. they probably haven't been asked on the ml because
the user doesn't want
to reg
"I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the
mailing lists. "
you are missing the point. they probably haven't been asked on the ml
because the user doesn't want to register/subscribe/manage the ml. some
people have a general aversion to ml's.
p.
On 25/11/2010 7:07 PM
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Andreas Andreou wrote:
> So, anyway, Tapestry has the mailing list, its website/documentation and
> there's
> always StackOverflow. Perhaps it makes sense to define a strategy on how to
> take
> advantage of that last one though
Completely agree.
Cheers
--
Ma
Ulrich,
of course you are entitled to your opinion.
p.
On 25/11/2010 6:47 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
That's just plain wrong. The form of communication (forum vs. mailing
list) will have no impact at all on whether questions you ask are
answered more or less conclusively. It's how you ask your q
I'm sorry but I strongly disagree: I have never seen a support service
as efficient as this mailing list.
And for free.
Il 25/11/2010 0.33, Paul Stanton ha scritto:
> "They (forums) are to publish discussions on specific matters."
>
> Exactly! I'm often disappointed with the level of help offered
I don't see why those questions can't be asked and answered on the mailing
lists.
If you want to ask or answer questions on stackoverflow, do it. If you want to create a forum that's
fine too. But the only *official* help source will be the mailing lists. Everything else will just
partition th
32 matches
Mail list logo
