Isn't this a simple typo?
you have property named 'gender' not 'genger' in profileDO.
Cheers,
Olaf
2011/9/27 Taha Hafeez Siddiqi
> Hi
>
> Two things.
>
> 1) why is there a gengerEnum property in Update.java when it is not in use
> ?
>
> 2) Is there a setter/getter for genger in ProfileDO ?
>
Hello,
is there the possibility to put the DiscardAfter on a method on component
level and only discard the persistent fields of this component and its
subcomponents, but *NOT* from the page?
I couldn't find any so i wrote a worker for my own annotation
@DiscardComponentAfter which can be placed o
Sh*t dudes. I left SF because there is no decent Tapestry work there. Good
luck getting your ball rolling. :-) Send a link if you're hiring. I'm crazy
enough to move back to the US for Tapestry.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Count me in.
>
> Kalle
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 27,
Count me in.
Kalle
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Chris Collins wrote:
> That sounds like a great idea (also in sf bay area).
>
> C
> On Sep 27, 2011, at 3:23 PM, George Ludwig wrote:
>
>> I searched meetup.com for a Tapestry meetup and didn't find one. I'm
>> still a newb at this, yet I find
That sounds like a great idea (also in sf bay area).
C
On Sep 27, 2011, at 3:23 PM, George Ludwig wrote:
> I searched meetup.com for a Tapestry meetup and didn't find one. I'm
> still a newb at this, yet I find the framework compelling, and am
> devoting a lot of energy to it.
>
> Is anyone else
Also, you can turn this check off, at least in 5.3 (in later releases,
the option to turn off the check may be removed). See the release
notes on the Tapestry home page.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> See the release notes about this; it is an intentional change, to
See the release notes about this; it is an intentional change, to
catch a common case of typos in names of event handler methods (the
component id part). You may be better wrapping your components in a
than a comment or .
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Vangel V. Ajanovski wrote:
> I was using
I was using 5.3 alpha in production up until a couple of days, and when
I changed the settings in the pom.xml to include latest beta, and
rebuild, the behaviour changed and invalidated several pages in run-time.
The problem is that suddenly errors occured in run-time, stating that
some compone
Steve,
For the time being, that works, yet the rub comes later on when I will
actually want to use the testing stuff. Other than hacking the
selenium jar to remove the code (which may break selenium for all I
know), I'm unsure of how to address this problem.
Frankly, I'm shocked that selenium ove
I searched meetup.com for a Tapestry meetup and didn't find one. I'm
still a newb at this, yet I find the framework compelling, and am
devoting a lot of energy to it.
Is anyone else interested in forming a meetup? I imagine it being the
usual things: speaker, hacking session, company sponsored piz
I thought this was a bad idea
On 28/09/2011, at 12:49 AM, Steve Eynon wrote:
> To enhance Tapestry, what are people's thoughts about defining default
> component values for some components as Symbols?
>
> For example, the Grid component has the following:
>
> @Parameter("25")
> private int rows
Hi,
I was looking for a similar solution (my example was a "period selection"
with a from- and to date - where a cross field validation had to ensure that
from date was before todate)
I found some usable examples in the 3 "sub-form" examples in jumpstart. I
ended up extending AbstractField for my
Actually this is supported since 5.2:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1094
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Good idea; A "symbol" binding prefix could do this quite easily, which
> would make your straw man proposal accurate.
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:49
Hi,
I think you can use a message: prefix as well (defining it in the
app.properties) - tough a symbol (or similar) binding for properties will
probably be less confusing.
For date field format the message: binding is a perfect match as you get all
the ordinary resource bundle goodness for free ;
On Sep 27, 2011, at 17:12 , Ernesto Arroyo wrote:
> in fact we should use sun jdk, not openjdk,
why do you think so? now that openjdk is the standard on linux and soon on
osx...
btw., if i remember correctly it was this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1554
cheers,
andi.
> b
That makes sense. But is there a way I can wrap this up into a validator that
say takes a fieldid, and then server side, the validator can grab the value
of the field id (in the same form of course) and compare it to the field the
validator is attached to?
This way I can just plug this to several
Hi
Two things.
1) why is there a gengerEnum property in Update.java when it is not in use ?
2) Is there a setter/getter for genger in ProfileDO ?
regards
Taha
On Sep 27, 2011, at 8:40 PM, Olga wrote:
> Hello, i have this problem.
>
> I have object Profile, this object has field
> private G
I believe this can only be done server-side.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:27 PM, cqasker wrote:
> Is there a way to do a validator that depends on other Fields? So for
> example, the Min validator can check against a static number - is there
> anyway to pass in the user input from another field to
in fact we should use sun jdk, not openjdk, but we will find some time to test
this and let you know the results
Ernesto Arroyo
... enviado desde mi iPad
El 26/09/2011, a las 22:07, Howard Lewis Ship escribió:
> That's a pretty old alpha version; I'd use "5.3-beta-10" which is
> latest-and-gr
Is there a way to do a validator that depends on other Fields? So for
example, the Min validator can check against a static number - is there
anyway to pass in the user input from another field to the validator.
So say
And I basically want to make sure "end" > "start". I know I can check this
w
Hello, i have this problem.
I have object Profile, this object has field
private GenderEnum gender;
When i need update Profile, i create form:
Update.tml
Gender:
Update.java
@Persist
private ProfileDO profileDO;
private GenderEnum gengerEnum;
public SelectModel getGengeres() {
Good idea; A "symbol" binding prefix could do this quite easily, which
would make your straw man proposal accurate.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Steve Eynon
wrote:
> To enhance Tapestry, what are people's thoughts about defining default
> component values for some components as Symbols?
>
> F
To enhance Tapestry, what are people's thoughts about defining default
component values for some components as Symbols?
For example, the Grid component has the following:
@Parameter("25")
private int rowsPerPage;
meaning if I wish for a pagination of 50 rows, I have to find all
instances of the
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:25:21 -0300, Muhammad Gelbana
wrote:
Also 2 things I stumbled upon:
1. Tapestry needs log4j
This isn't quite correct. Tapestry user SLF4J, which can use log4j
underneath.
2. Looks like in jetty, it's ok to use tml\properties file with a
different letter case th
When I first faced your case just today, I checked the logs, you'll find
some exceptions, start from there and eliminate these exceptions because
tapestry manager does not start your application because of these exceptions
(check tomcat manager for your application's state, it should be *stopped* !
Excellent, thanks for that. I was already thinking about providing a
mock for the ServletContext - good to know I was going down the right
lines!
Cheers,
Steve.
On 27 September 2011 20:27, Taha Hafeez wrote:
> I have one mail regarding it.
>
> I have attaching part of it inline...
>
> The probl
Sure:
First you need a CXF servlet to process incoming requests targeted at the web
service. Something
along the lines of
public class MyCXFServlet extends CXFNonSpringServlet
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = -2887022453330372210L;
@Override
public void loadBus(Servlet
I have one mail regarding it.
I have attaching part of it inline...
The problem is that the SpringModuleDef expects ApplicationContext to
be initialized as it is not loaded eagerly. If you somehow initialize
the context, then everything falls into place.
So I modified the CheetahPageTester like
I know this has been tentatively answered before, but I can't find any
reference to it...
I'm using the Tapestry PageTester (well, Testify actually) and have a
good few services defined in Spring. Can anyone give pointers as to
how I fire up the T5 / Spring integration within the test environment?
As you say, it's the tapestry-test module that references selenium
(via a Maven test dependency). If you don't use it, then you could
exclude it from your Maven POM.
On 27 September 2011 16:43, George Ludwig wrote:
> I've been ripping my hair out the last few hours trying to figure out
> why m
I've been ripping my hair out the last few hours trying to figure out
why my XML pretty print stopped working under Tapestry...
I'm running Eclipe 3.7, JDK 1.6, and Tapestry 5.2.5 on Jetty 6.1.26
I created the project using one of the maven Tapestry 5 prototypes,
and it included selenium server s
31 matches
Mail list logo
