Just a side note, this has caught a few users over time (since t5.1).
Boris' expected behaviour does not seem to me to be too unrealistic an
expectation! Depending on your personality type ;) you may even consider
this a bug.
Maybe the zone re-rendering process should handle this client id
c
I think all my changes for 5.3.2 are in place.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Serge Eby wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there an ETA for at least a release candidate for 5.3.2?
>> Just curious as some of us are waiting for the spring 3.1 inte
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:05:39 -0200, David Rees wrote:
>> I've got a form in a zone with multiple submits. If the user selects
>> one of them, I'd like to not do a zone update but instead do regular
>> form submit handling (w
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Serge Eby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there an ETA for at least a release candidate for 5.3.2?
> Just curious as some of us are waiting for the spring 3.1 integration fixes.
I think it's really close...
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
Thanks for the direction...Got it working!! Cheers!
On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:03 AM, François Facon wrote:
> And also
>
> The handler of
>
>class="report" t:zone="myZone" t:context="${host.hostid}">
>
> Delete ${host.hostid}
>
>
> something lik
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:05:39 -0200, David Rees wrote:
I've got a form in a zone with multiple submits. If the user selects
one of them, I'd like to not do a zone update but instead do regular
form submit handling (want to download a file using
BinaryStreamResponse instead of render a zone upda
I've got a form in a zone with multiple submits. If the user selects
one of them, I'd like to not do a zone update but instead do regular
form submit handling (want to download a file using
BinaryStreamResponse instead of render a zone update). tml looks
something like this:
Suggestions?
Thank you all! Well done.
On Jan 26, 2012, at 2:42 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> Tapestry-security, the comprehensive security package for Tapestry
> just got a bit more comprehensive with the new 0.4.1 release! 0.4.x is
> tested with and meant both for T5.2 and T5.3.
>
> We picked up the bra
Nice to see iFactory participating on the user mailing list!
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Mike Leonardo wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm working with integrating WURFL into my Tapestry app but I need to
> conditionally add WURFL's ServletContextListener through Tapestry but I can't
> figure out the r
Hi,
Is there an ETA for at least a release candidate for 5.3.2?
Just curious as some of us are waiting for the spring 3.1 integration fixes.
Thanks,
/Serge
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry-users.832.n2.nabble.com/T-5-3-2-release-tp7227508p7227508.html
Sent from the Tapestry Us
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:52:41 -0200, Mike Leonardo
wrote:
Hi,
Hi, Mike!
I'm working with integrating WURFL into my Tapestry app but I need to
conditionally add WURFL's ServletContextListener through Tapestry but I
can't figure out the right "hooks" or contribution that would make this
Hi,
I'm working with integrating WURFL into my Tapestry app but I need to
conditionally add WURFL's ServletContextListener through Tapestry but I can't
figure out the right "hooks" or contribution that would make this possible. I
want to avoid anything in my web.xml since my project is also u
No only, others problems are
- use of ajax with data on post for tapestry where jqm use get
- redirect after submit not manage by jqm
Perhaps a solution would be to use a zone as content pane (dojo user
will know what I mean)
in order to wrap all the jqm page with a Zone.
Clement try this kind of
Hi,
about the preloading page issue: Isn't it sufficient to remove the
HTTP-header X-Requested-With XMLHttpRequest, which is used by tapestry to
determine ajax requests?
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:57:38 -
> Von: Peter Stavrinides
> An: Ta
Hi,
I have also started a project using jQueryMobile and am utterly impressed with
this little library. Integration with Tapestry was trivial, however I also ran
into the same problem as François, jQueryMobile is heavily driven by ajax calls
to open dialogues and slide btw pages and also for p
It's true that I got allot of answers. Somebody said also something
about the documentation and I must agree that the quality of it is
impressive. Jumpstart also helps you find solutions to common
problems. Tapestry users seem also very vibrant about the technology
(I kno
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:49:39 -0200, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
>> I do this in Struts (with my own S2 json plugin)
>
> Point to Tapestry, which does this out-of-the-box without plugins! :)
Well, in turn I can choose betw
I think that the with SEO, clear error pages and graceful degradation I
have 3 silver bullets.
I just tested graceful degradation and it works perfectly with no extra
work in the code and that is something that is not available in Struts 2.
As Tiago said, the activation context makes it very
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:55:19 -0200, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
In Struts you have to do stuff you get for free with Tapestry. You
need to take care on this yourself, at least to my knowledge. The only
chance is someone (or you) writes a Struts 2 plugin for that, which
seems to be a pretty com
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:56:58 -0200, Chris Mylonas
wrote:
cool - yeah i agree i wouldn't do a line-by-line comparison of code,
but a higher level page by page and funtionality etc.
learn the db and apply it to tap - can only try it
I wouldn't even reuse the page and database structure
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:51:33 -0200, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
I am sorry.
I meant "optimized for SEO".
I do not use ajax for "standard" content, which then can be easily
optimized for SEO using S2
Tapestry has SEO built-in: pages and their activation context. For when
this is not enough,
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:49:39 -0200, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
I do this in Struts (with my own S2 json plugin)
Point to Tapestry, which does this out-of-the-box without plugins! :)
@JSON
class MyAction {
@JSON
private Map results = ...;
}
Thanks for the example. :) Does it suppo
cool - yeah i agree i wouldn't do a line-by-line comparison of code, but a
higher level page by page and funtionality etc.
learn the db and apply it to tap - can only try it
i.e. a block is a block (like sidebar in demo tap app)
the nav is the same
modules like blog & taxonomy would be easil
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Lance Java wrote:
>> When it comes to SEO I think you'll find this link interesting:
>>
> http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/getting-started.html
>
> I have come across this page before and it looks like a whole lot of rules
> and processes tha
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:05:33 -0200, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
>> I expect my users to have JS on these days. And if I need JS I do a
>> webapplication, not just a website. Websites can be easily optimized
>> with Struts2
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:03:17 -0200, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
> I can't imagine how doing this in Tapestry wouldn't be easier than Struts,
> any version:
>
> package a.b.c.pages;
>
> public class JsonResponse {
>
>
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:31:57 -0200, Chris Mylonas
wrote:
Hi Tap List -
Hi!
Short version:
Drupal -> Tapestry port - has anyone done something similar with _any_
CMS to tapestry?
I wouldn't do a code port. PHP is way too different from Java and
Tapestry, so the Drupal code (or any
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> Yep, Struts 2 isn't bad, but Tapestry and almost any other
> component-oriented framework, even JSF, is way better than Struts 2. And
> please, never ever think about adopting Struts 1. It sucks in every single
> way possible
> When it comes to SEO I think you'll find this link interesting:
>
http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/getting-started.html
I have come across this page before and it looks like a whole lot of rules
and processes that need to be in place in order to support ajax crawlable
site
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:33:14 -0200, Thim Anneesens
wrote:
Hello Tapestry users,
Hi!
Many people said many good reasons. I'd just add the community (the
mailing list usually provides very good answers in very short times), the
framework flexibility (you have at least one way to change a
Thiago, your previous replies were the reason I dodged java web frameworks
since early 2000 til now...you know your stuff...
on the below reply - because of this list's experience (as apposed to my
lay(simple) outlook on it all), would it be possible to make a comparison page
of "common requir
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:05:33 -0200, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
I expect my users to have JS on these days. And if I need JS I do a
webapplication, not just a website. Websites can be easily optimized
with Struts2. Webapplications - well do I need or even want to crawl
calculations or some oth
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:03:17 -0200, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
Hey guys,
Hi!
love. On Struts side I enjoy the easiness: make up an action and return
json.
I can't imagine how doing this in Tapestry wouldn't be easier than Struts,
any version:
package a.b.c.pages;
public class Json
Oops, I've accidentally hit the send button too early.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:03:17 -0200, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
Hey guys,
Hi!
while I agree that T5 is amazing I must say Struts2 is not so bad as it
is discussed here.
Yep, Struts 2 isn't bad, but Tapestry and almost any other
comp
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:03:17 -0200, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
Hey guys,
Hi!
while I agree that T5 is amazing I must say Struts2 is not so bad as it
is discussed here.
Yep, Struts 2 isn't bad, but Tapestry and almost any other
component-oriented framework, even JSF, is way better tha
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:12:41 -0200, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
Struts 1 is totally different to Struts 2.
I'd say Struts 2 (which is a rebranded WebWork) is the essence of Struts 1
but implemented in way better way. But it's still request-oriented, it's
still Struts, it's still using a
Thim Anneesens wrote
>
> Hello Tapestry users,
>
Hi!
Thim Anneesens wrote
>
> The company where I work is going to choose a web framework to implement
> there site (the company core business revolves around that site). We did
> a POC with Spirng MVC, JSF, Struts and Tapestry.
> We have sho
Cool,
Thx, that was a simple solution and it worked ! I must have had some
blackout not seeing this myself
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tap-5-3-x-Set-field-value-s-AFTER-transformation-tp5432669p5432717.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing li
Hi
Get the handle outside the advise and then use it inside.
regards
Taha
On Jan 26, 2012, at 5:20 PM, antalk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm in the process of converting our webapp to Tap5.3 and have come across
> the following issue: After a class has been transformed by plastic i want to
> update
Hi all,
I'm in the process of converting our webapp to Tap5.3 and have come across
the following issue: After a class has been transformed by plastic i want to
update a value within that class, but to get and change the fields contents
i use 'getHandle()' however, in the javadoc is states that 'No
Struts 1 is totally different to Struts 2.
I use Apache Cayenne with Struts 2, this saves me lots on persistence layer too.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Akira Ikeda wrote:
> Don't know about Struts2 but last time i worked on a project using Struts it
> have duplicated code everywhere eg: ac
Don't know about Struts2 but last time i worked on a project using Struts it
have duplicated code everywhere eg: action façade, dao's, dto's...the dtos were
script generated but still was duplicated code. If the project had used
Tapestry it would be something like ~ 20 % less code to write (or l
Please don't get me wrong, there are many things in which Tapestry
beats other frameworks. Not only Struts. Look at the hyped Wicket
framework. I have used it and can say I really dislike it. It is
utterly complex and the docs are the worst thing I have ever seen.
With Tapestry I could create a sim
well if i wasn't a techo i'd ask how many of the staff are familiar with X
first up.
then being a web framework, can the business layer be developed without the
web work being done (i.e. can it be separated later when the next round of
framework vs framework comes)
tapestry5 is the first
One killer argument is SEO (search engine optimisation). Is your webapp
publicly available and do you want to appear high in google results?
Whilst google's algorithms are hidden, it is known that if searching for a
ferarri, a site like
www.mysite.com/cars/ferarri
will appear higher in the searc
Hey guys,
while I agree that T5 is amazing I must say Struts2 is not so bad as it is
discussed here. There are far more bad frameworks out there. At least S2 is
not dead, it is actively maintained and developed. Anyway - T5 does have
some pretty cool features (class reloading, it is amazing, or co
Seriously? Struts vs. T5?
Go look to market which people you can find more easily & cheaper. At the
very end someone have to support the app.
Personally i will never go to pick-up struts job because it is dead. Unless
you pay me significant more for my wasted time :)
T5 simply the best web-fram
Thanks for the ammo guys ;).
Thim.
On 01/26/2012 10:20 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
(Thim, you don't know what poor English is...) It's always difficult
to win these arguments on technical merits alone, especially because
they are often looked at one-by-one inst
(Thim, you don't know what poor English is...) It's always difficult
to win these arguments on technical merits alone, especially because
they are often looked at one-by-one instead of as a whole. If at all
possible, try to find an angle that your organization or your manager
deeply cares about. Fo
I forgot one thing!
Line-Precise-Error-Reporting !
The elegent error handling in Tapestry is one of the strongest point.
I did not see that in you list.
If your developers are like me they sometimes make errors.
LPER leads to faster development. Together with live class reloading it's a
wi
Clean and readable
Having worked with Spring MVC, JSP, Struts and finally found Tapestry I can
just tell that a web project gets much much more "Clean and Readable" when
choosing T5.
The elegant page and component folder structure leads to an easy-to-locate
whatever you are searching for.
I
And also
The handler of
Delete ${host.hostid}
something like
@OnEvent(value = EventConstants.ACTION)
Object showDetail(int hostid)
{
if (!request.isXHR()) { return this; }
host.hostid = hostid;
return myZone;
}
on server s
Tapestry-security, the comprehensive security package for Tapestry
just got a bit more comprehensive with the new 0.4.1 release! 0.4.x is
tested with and meant both for T5.2 and T5.3.
We picked up the brand new Apache Shiro 1.2.0 release of which
development snapshots we've been running against fo
Hello Tapestry users,
The company where I work is going to choose a web framework to implement
there site (the company core business revolves around that site). We did
a POC with Spirng MVC, JSF, Struts and Tapestry.
We have shortlisted to Struts and Tapestry and I have the feeling that
Struts
54 matches
Mail list logo
