Re: Integrating Tapstry IOC only

2016-04-22 Thread Adam X
> Why? Just curious. :) Well, that brings me to my problem. What I'm really after is Tapestry's ordered configuration and its chain builder service, so I thought I may as well use IOC since I don't think I can split them. Or let me ask my question differently. Is Tapestry registry, chain builder a

Re: Integrating Tapstry IOC only

2016-04-22 Thread Christian Riedel
You would only need Tapestry IoC for the builders. Many moons ago I replaced Spring with Tapestry IoC in a Wicket project: https://github.com/criedel/WicketTap5IOC I bet you can find the appropriate hooks in your project to do something similar! APIs have changed since 5.2 though. With what frame

Re: Integrating Tapstry IOC only

2016-04-22 Thread Robert Zeigler
"Actually, I thought it would be a good joke to mix Wicket and Tapestry and make some die-hard-Wicket user use Tapestry to fill the IOC gap - instead of Spring and Guice.” Funniest thing I’ve read in awhile. Thanks for the laugh. Robert > On Apr 22, 2016, at 4:35 AM, Christian Riedel wrote: