On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:24:25 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship
wrote:
I have some ideas for a next-generation IoC that I hope to put together
someday (outside of Tapestry). I want to create something with a
different level of granularity, were you are injecting functions, not
services.
You prob
I have some ideas for a next-generation IoC that I hope to put together
someday (outside of Tapestry). I want to create something with a different
level of granularity, were you are injecting functions, not services. There
would be a whole lot of generics gymnastics to figure out how to map from a
> No distributed configuration?
Of course there is! Any module from any pod (jar) can contribute to
services defined in any other module from any other pod. That is
distributed configuration, right? That was built in from the get go!
> Well, I hope you had a chance to address some of the things t
No distributed configuration?
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Well, I hope you had a chance to address some of the things that are not
> perfect in T5 IoC!
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Steve Eynon <
> steve.ey...@alienfactory.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I
Well, I hope you had a chance to address some of the things that are not
perfect in T5 IoC!
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Steve Eynon
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery then T5-IoC has been paid a
> huge compliment...
>
> ...there's an IoC in the language Fantom
Hello,
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery then T5-IoC has been paid a
huge compliment...
...there's an IoC in the language Fantom that bears a striking resemblance
to T5-IoC!
afIoc - http://repo.status302.com/doc/afIoc/#overview
I've been an avid fan of Tapestry since v3, and with t
