We use Spring 1.2, but long ago wrote our own subclass of
ApplicationContext that will grab context override files from
elsewhere (including the local filesystem rather than the classpath).
It offers pretty much the exact functionality you are looking for.
I'm sure it can be applied to spring 2.0
ogether its config from different jars on the classpath like
HiveMind does?
Or do you still need to have a "master application.xml" and and do
manual includes?
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Tabuenca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:18 A
el Tabuenca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:18 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Re: [newbie] Spring vs Hivemind
>
> Spring 2.0 has singleton/prototype/request/session/global
> session/ and custom scopes. It should be noted that spring'
Spring 2.0 has singleton/prototype/request/session/global session/
and custom scopes. It should be noted that spring's prototype scope is
different from hivemind in that an object is created every time a
referencing dependency is set or when one requests it directly via a
getBean("beanName"). In t
a [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 9:49 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Re: [newbie] Spring vs Hivemind
>
> While we're on the subject, am I correct in my assessment
> that the only feature that hivemind has that spring does not
> is t
While we're on the subject, am I correct in my assessment that the
only feature that hivemind has that spring does not is the whole
configuration point /contribution system? It's been a while since I've
really used hivemind so I may be wrong.
On 11/22/06, Kalle Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think Sam put it pretty well. Cyrille, you should also read the other
thread "Tapernate access multiple database" that touches the Hivemind/Spring
subject. I often think the primary use scenarios of commons-logging and
log4j are analogous to Hivemind and Spring. If you are building a library or
I find spring easier to use. There's not much difference in what the
two can do in terms of dependency injection. The one thing that makes
hivemind different is the whole configuration point/ contribution idea
which makes it easier for things to plug right in by simply dropping a
properly configur
Go well with hivemind, because it can do everything Spring does (and
sometime even better).
However a look @ Spring can enforce your skill ;-P
kiuma
On 11/21/06, Cyrille37 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm new with Tapestry. I've selected Tapestry for my future project
because of its simp
It depends entirely on the context of the app. Tap has some
dependancies on hivemind, so you will wind up dealing with hivemind
and hivemind configs to some extent no matter which solution you use.
However, the spring integration is very easy to use, and it is easily
possible to keep all of the l
Hello,
I'm new with Tapestry. I've selected Tapestry for my future project
because of its simplicity and its wysiwyg capabilities.
I'd done well the tutorial, and have workbench example running well.
That's great ;-)
By the way, here are some questions :
Should I learn and use Spring with Ta
11 matches
Mail list logo
