Hi Paul,
it's in latest 5.5.0-beta-3
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:55 AM Paul Stanton wrote:
> "We can push a new 5.5 beta for early testers."
>
> ^-- is this available? if not, any eta?
>
> On 11/09/2019 4:43 am, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:31 AM Chris
"We can push a new 5.5 beta for early testers."
^-- is this available? if not, any eta?
On 11/09/2019 4:43 am, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:31 AM Chris Poulsen
wrote:
I did roll an "internal" 5.5-beta version based on the code from 12th July
as there are
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:31 AM Chris Poulsen
wrote:
> I did roll an "internal" 5.5-beta version based on the code from 12th July
> as there are some fixes in HEAD that are not in the beta-2 and that bastard
> build is what we currently are using without problems.
>
We can push a new 5.5 beta
I did roll an "internal" 5.5-beta version based on the code from 12th July
as there are some fixes in HEAD that are not in the beta-2 and that bastard
build is what we currently are using without problems.
If 5.5 isn't 100% ready for release yet, it seems to be really close and it
would be good
Sounds good to me. We'd be very happy to test a 5.5-beta. (Large
application that has about 1M LOC, including unit-tests, TML, etc.)
On 9/9/2019 3:08 PM, Dmitry Gusev wrote:
Hi Charles,
Current state of the master branch should run just fine on Java 11; there's
no release you can download
Hi Charles,
Current state of the master branch should run just fine on Java 11; there's
no release you can download though.
We should probably start a vote on another Tapestry 5.5-beta soon to
release current state of the master branch,
and maybe make a first 5.5.0 release right after we get
Is there any new(ish) word on Tapestry 5.5 or any other release that
will run under Java 9, 10, and maybe 11?
Thanks!
On 10/8/2018 12:54 PM, Bob Harner wrote:
Yes. The unreleased 5.5 version passses all tests with the Java 9+
compatible version of ASM (which was the obstacle for running
Thiago would be the best bet I think. Contact him directly.
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018, 11:40 PM Adriaan Joubert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw the list of team members on http://tapestry.apache.org/about.html -
> any indication who is actively working on tapestry and would be interested
> in us sponsoring
Hi,
I saw the list of team members on http://tapestry.apache.org/about.html -
any indication who is actively working on tapestry and would be interested
in us sponsoring some of the work to get Tapestry 5.5 out?
Thanks!
Adriaan
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 15:43, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:58 PM Adriaan Joubert
wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hello!
> we are also very interested in seeing 5.5 released. If there is a
> company/consultant supporting Tapestry we would be interested in seeing
> whether there is some way to support this development.
>
There's no company
Hi,
we are also very interested in seeing 5.5 released. If there is a
company/consultant supporting Tapestry we would be interested in seeing
whether there is some way to support this development.
Best regards
Adriaan
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 10:03, gard sæbø
wrote:
> Hi Bob!
>
> Sorry for
Hi Bob!
Sorry for late reply.
Thats good. It will save us for a lot of work.
We are looking forward to the new release :)
Best regards,
Gard
> On 8 Oct 2018, at 18:54, Bob Harner wrote:
>
> Yes. The unreleased 5.5 version passses all tests with the Java 9+
> compatible version of ASM (which
Yes. The unreleased 5.5 version passses all tests with the Java 9+
compatible version of ASM (which was the obstacle for running Tapestry 5.4
under Java 9+) and should be usable for Java 9 and 10 now (once released),
although it hasn't been tested enough by others. I haven't checked it with
Java
Hi!
We are upgrading all our Java applications, which currently runs on Java 8, to
Java 11.
Our web applications use Apache Tapestry as the frontend framework, but it
seems a bit quite on the Tapestry commit log in comparison with other frontend
frameworks.
Will there be any upgrade which
14 matches
Mail list logo
