.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 10:11 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: I'm missing something obvious
Aha.
So the only real difference between the demo page and your
configuration is that you specified a pattern of 0
What issue exactly is it that you see?
If you could provide the exact text that is presented as the reason for the
error as well as what input you gave it to produce the error I can be more
helpful.
On 5/14/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grabbing today's latest build, I'm still
Sorry Jesse, I didn't realize this message didn't have the whole trail.
I have a simple input:
input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId
validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100
translator=translator:number,pattern=0
displayName=Trade
Hmm doesn't seem to be conjuring up any eurekas for me currently. .
I wonder what the difference is between your field and the fields on the
Workbench form?
http://opencomponentry.com:8080/workbench/Home,$Border.pageLink.sdirect?sp=SFields
It has a similar setup but I can't see where the error
I'm assuming that any value between 1 and 99 should work. I just
tried 1234 and it failed as does every other number I type in.
Playing w/ the page at opencomponentry that you linked below, the
validators seem to work fine which is why I can't figure out what's up.
I really think I must
Aha.
So the only real difference between the demo page and your configuration is
that you specified a pattern of 0. The demo pages use the more generic #
(as well as the default for the number translator).
If I remember correctly specifying something like 0 for the pattern forces
your input to
This is a regression, the JIRA issue is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1071
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:57 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: I'm missing something obvious
I have a simple form
6:57 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: I'm missing something obvious
I have a simple form that includes this:
input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId
validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100
translator=translator:number,pattern=0
/TAPESTRY-1071
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 6:57 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: I'm missing something obvious
I have a simple form that includes this:
input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId
I have a simple form that includes this:
input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId
validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100
translator=translator:number,pattern=0
displayName=Trade ID
/
And no matter what legal numeric value I
What's the type of tradeId ?
On 5/10/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a simple form that includes this:
input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED] value=ognl:tradeId
validators=validators:required,min=0,max=100
translator=translator:number,pattern=0
Sorry, I should have supplied that in my original e-mail.
public abstract Integer getTradeId();
Thanks again
Tony
Andreas Andreou wrote:
What's the type of tradeId ?
On 5/10/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a simple form that includes this:
input jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
well... the code is correct... i even tried it myself!
So, what kind of validation error you get?
Client side? or server side? What happens if you disable javascript?
On 5/11/07, Tony Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I should have supplied that in my original e-mail.
public
Client side.. the nifty new dojo popup.
If I disable client side validation it works fine, and I will do that
for now.. but I'd really rather not.
Thanks again
Tony
Andreas Andreou wrote:
well... the code is correct... i even tried it myself!
So, what kind of validation error you get?
14 matches
Mail list logo