Re: Tapestry-jpa 5.3 vs Tapestry-Hibernate

2012-03-14 Thread Robert Zeigler
Not sure how tapestry-jpa handles un-persisted instances. That is certainly another area where tapestry-hibernate does not give you a useable ValueEncoder. To clarify my last post: tapestry-hibernate will give you a functional default value encoder if: 1) The entity has a single column pk 2)

Re: Tapestry-jpa 5.3 vs Tapestry-Hibernate

2012-03-14 Thread George Christman
Thanks Robert for your reply. Yes I was referring to custom value encoders, perhaps I'm misusing them. I seem to be writing custom value encoders for components like the AjaxAddRow which is nothing more than a single column pk. The reason I use them is to generate a temp id 's for the component to

Re: Tapestry-jpa 5.3 vs Tapestry-Hibernate

2012-03-14 Thread Robert Zeigler
Disclaimer: I haven't used tapestry-jpa. :) But, Tapestry uses value encoders. tapestry-hibernate uses them, tapestry-jpa uses them. Tapestry uses them. The only question is whether you need to write custom value encoders. tapestry-hibernate will provide default encoders for entities with a singl