Re: i don't like the new tapestry 5 based on xml ?

2007-09-30 Thread Penyihir Kecil
ow i can see now why it used *.tml thnx nick for showing me the link Nick Westgate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marketing eh? Interesting idea. Here are the actual reasons from the dev list discussion: http://www.nabble.com/-DISCUSS--T5-template-extension-change-tf4502622.html 1) Use the

i don't like the new tapestry 5 based on xml ?

2007-09-29 Thread Penyihir Kecil
dunno why but i'm little bothered by the new concept of tapestry 5 based on xml if it's true...then it will has strict rules when writing html tag it has to be xml rules not html In a change from Tapestry 4, under Tapestry 5, component templates are well formed XML documents. That means

Re: i don't like the new tapestry 5 based on xml ?

2007-09-29 Thread Chris Lewis
If you're only real concern is that fact that you have to have well-formed documents, I'd suggest you examine your coding practices. Having unclosed tags is not smart as it will break the rendering. As far as *tml, I agree its annoying and its most likely named that for marketing reasons, but

Re: i don't like the new tapestry 5 based on xml ?

2007-09-29 Thread Penyihir Kecil
i'm not saying i like unclosed tag we're not work alone man... when you're work on team everything could be happenned it's not about smart or dumb (sorry) just my humble opinion and also i think you don't have to personal attacking me it just my opinion about tapestry not personal attacking you

Re: i don't like the new tapestry 5 based on xml ?

2007-09-29 Thread Chris Lewis
I didn't realize that it was a (partial) attempt at preventing the container from serving them as static. However, Use the extension .tml (Tapestry Markup Language) confirms that there is at least some degree of branding. Many frameworks do this (rhtml anyone?), and probably for several

Re: i don't like the new tapestry 5 based on xml ?

2007-09-29 Thread Chris Lewis
I was offering you a pragmatic reason for avoiding broken html at all costs. I am not arguing and was certainly not insulting you. Penyihir Kecil wrote: i'm not saying i like unclosed tag we're not work alone man... when you're work on team everything could be happenned it's not about smart or

Re: i don't like the new tapestry 5 based on xml ?

2007-09-29 Thread Nick Westgate
If you switch to a 5.0.6 snapshot, yes. Cheers, Nick. Chris Lewis wrote: I didn't realize that it was a (partial) attempt at preventing the container from serving them as static. However, Use the extension .tml (Tapestry Markup Language) confirms that there is at least some degree of

Re: i don't like the new tapestry 5 based on xml ?

2007-09-29 Thread Christian Gruber
Heh. See!? I told you it should be configurable. ;) christian. On 29-Sep-07, at 2:08 PM, Chris Lewis wrote: I didn't realize that it was a (partial) attempt at preventing the container from serving them as static. However, Use the extension .tml (Tapestry Markup Language) confirms that