On 27/09/2010 03:39, sbrejeon wrote:
The spec says that If A or B is an enum, coerce both A and B to enum, apply
operator.
Does't it simply mean that both A and B must be coercible to enums. instead
of if A is an enum then B must be an enum of type A, or vice versa.
No. Both must be of the
Carter, Reginald wrote:
log4j:event
logger=com.crystaldecisions.sdk.plugin.authentication.ldap.internal.LDAPImpl
timestamp=1284763084123
level=ERROR thread=http-44306-Processor25
log4j:message![CDATA[GetDirContext(): Failed to obtain
InitialDirContext]]/log4j:message
Hi all,
I have developed an application which instanciates a singleton class in
the init method of a servlet. This servlet is defined in the web.xml with
the load-on-startup1/load-on-startup tag. This singleton class start a
Thread which notifies the singleton class when a configuration file has
Hello,
I wrote a web application, that works great with a server under Tomcat
6.0.13 and client with Windows XP OS, in which user has to upload (text)
files that are read and exploited.
I tried this application (on a client machine) under Windows 7 and it works
with uploaded files around 5-6 kb
I answer me:
I'm using reloadable=true in my context. Is that the reason a found this
behaviour??? Am I right??? If I use reloadable=false init method of
servlets will not be executed, am I right???
Here is the explanation I found:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-3.2-doc/uguide/tomcat_ug.html
Julie Gautier wrote:
Hello,
I wrote a web application, that works great with a server under Tomcat
6.0.13 and client with Windows XP OS, in which user has to upload (text)
files that are read and exploited.
I tried this application (on a client machine) under Windows 7 and it works
with
Thanks for your quick reply !
It's correct : the only thing that changes is the client.
For the browser question, the behavior is the same with IE 8 or FF.
Thanks for your help.
Julie Gautier
-Message d'origine-
De : André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Envoyé : lundi 27 septembre
Sorry but no. This statement does not match the localhost part you also
mentioned.
So really what is changing is that both the client and the server are changing
to Windows 7. Start by looking at your firewall settings.
-Original Message-
From: Julie Gautier
From: jmorati...@dit.upm.es [mailto:jmorati...@dit.upm.es]
Subject: Re: About ContainerBackgroundProcessor thread
Here is the explanation I found:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-3.2-doc/uguide/tomcat_ug.html
You can't seriously be using Tomcat 3.2, are you? That hasn't been supported
for
Hi,
No, I manage the server where the application is stored and it didn't change
! The server OS didn't change ! Only the client : if I try with a machine
under XP it works (IE or FF), if I try under W7, it doesn't (IE nor FF) !
And the log file on the server is really called
From: Maximilian Stocker [mailto:m...@talentoyster.com]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0 and Windows 7
Sorry but no. This statement does not match the
localhost part you also mentioned.
I'll bite. Why do you say that? The localhost part of the log file name
refers to the Host name attribute, not
Maximilian Stocker wrote:
Sorry but no. This statement does not match the localhost part you also
mentioned.
Maximilian,
For a minute, you had me doubt there.
So sorry but no, your mistake, not mine. The server will always create this
localhost.log file. It is the server that is
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Maximilian Stocker [mailto:m...@talentoyster.com]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 6.0 and Windows 7
Sorry but no. This statement does not match the
localhost part you also mentioned.
I'll bite. Why do you say that? The localhost part of the log file name refers to
Many thanks Caldarale. I'm working with tomcat 6, but a I was looking so
quickly for an answer that I didn't realise that it was the tomcat 3.2
user manual, but that explained me what happened.
I think that WatchedResource will help me for this kind of tasks
From: jmorati...@dit.upm.es
1. Yes, it's exactly the same file
2. What do you mean by network section ?
3. I'm not sure for the last questions (I'm not a server specialist, I'm
more a java developer), I'll try to explain the environment :
I installed the web application on a server : I installed Apache Tomcat (as
a
On 27.09.2010 15:42, jmorati...@dit.upm.es wrote:
Many thanks Caldarale. I'm working with tomcat 6, but a I was looking so
quickly for an answer that I didn't realise that it was the tomcat 3.2
user manual, but that explained me what happened.
I think thatWatchedResource will help me for this
On 27.9.2010 15:45, Julie Gautier wrote:
I installed the web application on a server : I installed Apache Tomcat (as
a service) on the server machine and put my web application under Apache
Software Foundation\Tomcat 6.0\webapps\ROOT.
The first client machine is mine (running XP), the second one
Ok, I'll try. Thanks.
Julie Gautier
ACTES SUD
04 90 49 33 71
-Message d'origine-
De : Ognjen Blagojevic [mailto:ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : lundi 27 septembre 2010 16:20
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: Tomcat 6.0 and Windows 7
On 27.9.2010 15:45, Julie Gautier wrote:
On 9/23/10 8:15 PM, Roy McMorran wrote:
We are observing an odd behavior after upgrading to 6.0.29.
Ordinarily if an exception occurs this will be logged to
catalina.out. When Tomcat is first started (we use jsvc) this is the
case as expected. However if the webapp is redeployed (without
At the end of this page :
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/logging.html#log4j
there is this paragraph :
If you have multiple instances of Tomcat, each with a separate $CATALINA_HOME but a shared
$CATALINA_BASE, then you can configure log4j on a per instance basis by replacing
Hi, i'm working with Tomcat and i've configured a Realm for user
authentication against Oracle OID. Sniffing the communication between the
client and the OID server everything seems to be fine, but when the user
authenticates the application then displays the 403 forbidden error page.
This is the
On 27/09/2010 17:58, André Warnier wrote:
At the end of this page :
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/logging.html#log4j
When looking at doc bugs I'd recommend working with the CI output which
will reflect and changes since the last release. The link above will
always be from the latest
Hello,
We have 2 tomcat servers in cluster with session sharing and
notifyListenersOnReplication=true.
The application deployed uses a HttpSessionBindingListener to be aware
of the number of licenses used by a user on the 2 servers.
This configuration works great when the 2 servers are
From: Julio César Chaves Fernández [mailto:hent...@gmail.com]
Subject: Tomcat ldap authentication with 403 Forbidden error
i'm working with Tomcat
What *exact* version?
This is the security section in the app web.xml
I don't see any security-role element in the above, which is required.
Hi, i'm working with Tomcat 5.5.31 ... but i've also tested this
configuration on 6.0.29 and it displays the same error. The security-role is
right below the security-constraint closing tag and above the login-config
opening tag.
Thanks.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
Hi, I have a web app running on JBoss. I have made sure the following:
1. /jbossweb-tomcat55.sar/conf/web.xml to set the session timeout as 30 minutes:
session-config
session-timeout30/session-timeout
/session-config
2. I am using sessionCreated/sessionDestroyed and
From: Julio César Chaves Fernández [mailto:hent...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Tomcat ldap authentication with 403 Forbidden error
The security-role is right below the security-constraint
closing tag and above the login-config opening tag.
Sorry, I missed it. However, the security-role
On 27.09.2010 20:16, Jing Chen wrote:
Hi, I have a web app running on JBoss. I have made sure the following:
1. /jbossweb-tomcat55.sar/conf/web.xml to set the session timeout as 30 minutes:
session-config
session-timeout30/session-timeout
/session-config
2. I am using
From: Jing Chen [mailto:jin...@yahoo.com]
Subject: session won't timeout
For some reason, some user's session just won't timeout and
showing active in the system for days. The user has already
closed the browser.
What could be possible reasons for sessions being active for
so long?
Hi is that all thats in the log. It appears read timeout should be
caused by an upstream IO Exception.
Wes
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Julie Gautier j.gaut...@actes-sud.fr wrote:
Hello,
I wrote a web application, that works great with a server under Tomcat
6.0.13 and client with Windows
Does anyone have tips for unit testing a servlet that implements
CometProcessor?
I have a servlet similar in structure to the the Chat Servlet example here:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/aio.html
So, examples for testing that servlet code would be beneficial.
Thanks in advance.
Wesley Acheson wrote:
Hi is that all thats in the log. It appears read timeout should be
caused by an upstream IO Exception.
That is obviously what the server is saying.
It seems that the server is trying to read what the browser should be sending, but that
the browser closes the connection
It's solved. The problem is that the ldap group name is in uppercase while the
security-role as well as the auth-constraint have the name in lowercase.
Thanks.
Le 27/09/2010 à 13:24, Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com a
écrit :
From: Julio César Chaves Fernández
On 27/09/2010 14:45, Julie Gautier wrote:
authentify...
Like it.
p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Julio,
--- On Mon, 9/27/10 at 11:24 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote:
The security-role is right below the
security-constraint
closing tag and above the login-config opening tag.
Sorry, I missed it. However, the
security-role element normally comes /after/
Oops, just saw the [solved] msg...
--- On Mon, 9/27/10 at 7:55 PM, Bob Hall rfha...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 9/27/10 at 11:24 AM, Caldarale, Charles R
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
wrote:
The security-role is right below the
security-constraint
closing tag and above the
Hehehe thanks anyway, i appreciate it. But yes, it was the comparison and the
case of both words.
Le 27/09/2010 à 21:57, Bob Hall rfha...@yahoo.com a écrit :
Oops, just saw the [solved] msg...
--- On Mon, 9/27/10 at 7:55 PM, Bob Hall rfha...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 9/27/10 at 11:24
37 matches
Mail list logo
