On 28 April 2016 at 18:21, jieryn wrote:
> You can get the same effect using standard web.xml fragment and
> without a 3rd party dependency:
>
>
>
>
>
> /*
>
>
> CONFIDENTIAL
>
>
Hi, and thanks for taking the time to reply.
Unfortunately, rather than
On 28 April 2016 at 23:04, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Lyallex,
>
> On 4/28/16 1:12 PM, Lyallex wrote:
>> apache-tomcat-7.0.42 jdk1.8.0_77 CentOS Linux 7.2.1511
>> urlrewritefilter-4.0.3.jar
>>
>> I'm using the rewrite filter from http://tuckey.
Hi,
any help with regards to the following issue is highly appreciated.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/36929016/java-io-ioexception-broken-pipe-within-an-apache-tomcat-valve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lyallex,
On 4/28/16 1:12 PM, Lyallex wrote:
> apache-tomcat-7.0.42 jdk1.8.0_77 CentOS Linux 7.2.1511
> urlrewritefilter-4.0.3.jar
>
> I'm using the rewrite filter from http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/
>
> I have a rule, it's supposed to 301 perm-redir
Thanks Andre
If an upgrade we will bump up to Tomcat 9 if this is a stable release
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:24 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Tomcat Vulnerabilities
On 28.04.2016 21:48,
On 28.04.2016 21:48, Taylor, Larry wrote:
Hello,
I am using Tomcat Version: apache-tomcat-7.0.50
That version dates back to 2014.
The latest version in that branch is 7.0.69
See : http://tomcat.apache.org/download-70.cgi
OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago) 64bit
Issue
Hello,
I am using Tomcat Version: apache-tomcat-7.0.50
OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 (Santiago) 64bit
Issue: There were 2 vulnerabilities found and need to know if there are
configurations or patches available to resolve these.
1. Tomcat was configured to use SSL https
On 28/04/2016 16:31, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2016-04-28 17:14 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> I've done some investigation. It looks like something is going wrong in
>> the native connector. It should be failing the connection on the basis that
>> there is no matching ALPN protocol. For some reason,
You can get the same effect using standard web.xml fragment and
without a 3rd party dependency:
/*
CONFIDENTIAL
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Lyallex wrote:
> apache-tomcat-7.0.42
> jdk1.8.0_77
> CentOS Linux 7.2.1511
> urlrewritefilter-4.0.3.ja
apache-tomcat-7.0.42
jdk1.8.0_77
CentOS Linux 7.2.1511
urlrewritefilter-4.0.3.jar
I'm using the rewrite filter from http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/
I have a rule, it's supposed to 301 perm-redirect from http to https
seo redirect
^www.example.com
^localhost
^/(.*)
2016-04-28 17:14 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
> I've done some investigation. It looks like something is going wrong in
> the native connector. It should be failing the connection on the basis that
> there is no matching ALPN protocol. For some reason, the protocol specified
> by the client is returned
On 28 April 2016 10:04:49 BST, Mark Thomas wrote:
>On 28/04/2016 09:51, Kreuser, Peter wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>>>
>>> On 27/04/2016 10:01, Kreuser, Peter wrote:
Mark,
I read that you ported all the new SSL functionality to 8.5, so my
>first guess was, that if that problem was new, you
>
> Here is something that might interest you :
>>
>
> https://github.com/dblock/waffle/blob/master/Docs/ServletSingleSignOnSecurityFilter.md
> and look for "impersonate".
> It is however NOT what you want, because if I understand this correctly,
> the "impersonation" of the webapp user only applie
On 28/04/2016 09:51, Kreuser, Peter wrote:
> Mark,
>
>>
>> On 27/04/2016 10:01, Kreuser, Peter wrote:
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> I read that you ported all the new SSL functionality to 8.5, so my first
>>> guess was, that if that problem was new, you might want to know what's
>>> wrong ;-).
>>>
On 2
Mark,
>
>On 27/04/2016 10:01, Kreuser, Peter wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> I read that you ported all the new SSL functionality to 8.5, so my first
>> guess was, that if that problem was new, you might want to know what's wrong
>> ;-).
>>
>>> On 25/04/2016 17:10, Kreuser, Peter wrote:
Hi there,
>
15 matches
Mail list logo