Been thinking about
Log4j -> syslog -> syslog server
That way you can look at the server and also at the syslog server ... give you
a real time view.
I keep my per server syslogs for 4-7 days and the on the syslog server for
months ..
A
> -Original Message-
> From: John Rellis [mail
13 September 2012 12:51 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Q) ajp connector
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alex,
>
> On 9/12/12 9:17 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
> > I have a design question. I have an application that
Hi
I have a design question. I have an application that uses long lived
connections back to the server so
App -> IIS -> AJP Connector -> Jboss/Tomcat
Or
App -> Apache -> AJP Connector -> Jboss/Tomcat
So I know that IIS / Apache can handle lots of connections without pairing it 1
thread to 1
[snip]
> >
> > and the thread count is over the 264.
> >
> > oh yeah.
> > the pain of using IIS !
>
> Thanks for sharing the solution.
Least I can do !
>
> Rainer
> [snip]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr..
: IIS 7.5 + AJP Connector
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alex,
>
> On 9/9/12 10:35 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
> >> -Original Message- From: Martin Gainty
> >> [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, 10 September 201
[snip]
> > So I have setup the dev env with the new (current plugin) and I am still
> seeing it limit to 265...
>
> How do you measure the 265? What's your original observation?
Task manager, I turn on the threads column
[snip]
> > worker.worker2.lock=pessimistic
> > worker.worker2.max_packet_s
[snip]
> >
> >Whatever you are seeing, note that unknown attributes will go through
> silently. So the fact that there is no complaint about the configuration
> during
> >startup does not mean the attributes actually make sense.
> >
> >You can check the config also in the status worker.
> I have
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, 10 September 2012 12:11 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: IIS 7.5 + AJP Connector
>
>
> Alex
>
> connection_pool_size is usually for pooling algorithms such as DBCP..
> Are you following t
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Monday, 10 September 2012 8:58 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: IIS 7.5 + AJP Connector
[snip]
>>> Don't know what is, but connection_pool_size only goes to the
>>> ajp13 workers, not to the lb
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
> Sent: Sunday, 9 September 2012 7:03 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: IIS 7.5 + AJP Connector
>
> On 08.09.2012 23:35, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
> > Hi
> >
>
=worker.template
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
> Sent: Saturday, 8 September 2012 4:16 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: IIS 7.5 + AJP Connector
>
> Its okay I have found the setting ... not sure how I missed it before !
>
> A
Its okay I have found the setting ... not sure how I missed it before !
A
-Original Message-
From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker [mailto:alex.sa...@yieldbroker.com]
Sent: Saturday, 8 September 2012 3:28 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: IIS 7.5 + AJP Connector
Hi
I was wondering if
Hi
I was wondering if anyone has seen this problem or whether they know a fix.
So environment
2 x W2k8r2 NLB IIS servers
IIS 7.5 + AJP (1.2.36) connected to 2 x 2 Jboss Server.. (2 cluster of 2
environments)
I have a separate worker pool setup for each environment (2 vhost each with
their own
[snip]
>
> Without rubbing it in too forcefully, this is exactly the reason why it is
> important to provide precise technical details right from the start.
Lack of details yep, my fault. You write thing presuming people who deal with
it every day know and think the same way. Always better for m
Yep I understand, one can hope
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
> Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2012 7:38 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: issue with iis 7.5 ajpconnector
>
> On 25.07.2012 22:40, Alex Samad - Yieldbr
age-
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
> Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2012 12:38 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: issue with iis 7.5 ajpconnector
>
> On 25.07.2012 13:23, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
> > Hi Andre
> >
Hi Andre
Apologies for the sparseness.
> -Original Message-
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2012 5:14 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: issue with iis 7.5 ajpconnector
>
[snip]
> >
>
> Just to avoid any future misunderstandings and (addi
Hi
I have II 7.5 setup and currently 2 vhosts each vhost has its own applicati= on
pool and it's on copy of the ajp connector
We did this so that we can say run prod and uat at different version and al=
so make sure that bringing one down doesn't affect the other !
Now I went to add ano
to everyone who has spent time looking at my problem.
____
From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
To: Tomcat Users List ; ann ramos
Sent: Monday, 21 May 2012 9:42 AM
Subject: RE: Isapi redirector log file is always empty - IIS 7.5 - Tomcat
7.0.26 - Isapi 1.2.30 - Win
Silly question but does IIS have write permissions to the directory where you
are writing the isapi log ?
A
-Original Message-
From: ann ramos [mailto:ramos_mary...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, 21 May 2012 9:19 AM
To: Tomcat Users List; Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Isapi redirector log fi
> -Original Message-
> From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
> Sent: Monday, 26 March 2012 8:47 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: chunked encoding
>
> On 25/03/2012 08:54, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> >
[snip]
>
> 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chunked_transfer_encoding
> 2. RFC 2616 (the specification of HTTP/1.1 protocol)
Thanks, I had also hoped to get a bit of debate on the !experimental! nature
of it in the connector
How does it affect compression. So I presume the chunking is between
Hi
I saw a thread earlier about chunked encoding and why
a) it might be better to use that
b) that it is not experimental any more
Can somebody explain what it is, why it might be better and maybe some pro's
and con's and how not experimental is it.
Even some pointers to papers, wiki's, blog t
> -Original Message-
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 March 2012 5:57 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: IIS 7.0 Worker process crashes on App Pool recycling since ISAPI
> redirector 1.2.33
>
> On 03/20/2
> -Original Message-
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 March 2012 4:09 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: IIS 7.0 Worker process crashes on App Pool recycling since ISAPI
> redirector 1.2.33
>
> On 03/20/2
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker [mailto:alex.sa...@yieldbroker.com]
[snip]
>
> Hi Mladen
>
> Q) can I presume that this new version will not interfere with an old version
> 1.2.32 ? as the mutex name used in this new one 1.2.34 wasn't use
Hi Mladen
Q) can I presume that this new version will not interfere with an old version
1.2.32 ? as the mutex name used in this new one 1.2.34 wasn't used in 1.2.32 ?
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker [mailto:alex.sa...@yieldbroker.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 20
Hi
Thanks, looks like this one is the winner !
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 March 2012 1:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
Subject: Re: IIS 7.0 Worker process crashes on App Pool recycling since ISAPI
Hi
Sorry it failed for me, started up, but I got some error messages
I have 4 processes setup for non-overlapping recycle
Log 1
Log 2
[Mon Mar 19 09:43:13.970 2012] [2096:2984] [error] service::jk_lb_worker.c
(1172): Failed allocating AJP message buffer
[Mon Mar 19 09:43:13.986 2012] [2096:2984
[snip]
> > Just wondering (thinking a bit left field), but question was asked of me.
> Any reason to have a shm across processes.
> >
>
> So that worker state is replicated across processes.
> Eg, if connection to one backend is broken each process will have to discover
> that by itself. Shared
Hi
Guys (Konstantin, Mladen), goo d work, sorry caught me on a Sunday, else I
would have chipped in.
Just wondering (thinking a bit left field), but question was asked of me. Any
reason to have a shm across processes.
We already have threading inside each worker process. What are the benefi
[snip]
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > 1.2.32 was doing that for me.. 1.2.33 was meant to fix it, but I can't
> > get 1.2.33 to load.
> >
> > Do you use overlapping recycle and a web garden ?
> >
> > Alex
> >
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> I don't think I'm using a web garden - I just have one application pool
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Preißer [mailto:verlag.preis...@t-online.de]
> Sent: Saturday, 17 March 2012 2:31 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: IIS 7.0 Worker process crashes on App Pool recycling since ISAPI
> redirector 1.2.33
>
> >
> > Any idea what these lines c
> -Original Message-
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012 5:01 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Issues with the tomcat connector (On W2k8 + IIS7.5)
>
> On 03/13/2012 12:09 AM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Try the RC binaries from
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat-connectors/jk-1.2.33/
>
> Does this one crashes as well?
Okay, got your build from there.
1) it loads up with single application thread (so not a web garden) but then
failed
2) I tried it as a web garden, so 4 process
Thanks I will
[snip]
> >
> > From Failed Request tracking on IIS
> >
> > ErrorDescription
> > Calling LoadLibraryEx on ISAPI filter
> "C:\YB\Shared\dev.yieldbroker.com\ajpconfig\isapi_redirect.dll" failed
> >
>
> Try the RC binaries from
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat-connectors/jk-1.
/06/2012 11:50 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I patched Mmakefile.amd64 it was different to the x86 one then ran
> nmake -f Makefile.amd64
>
> again, built no errors or warnings
>
>
;
> Alex,
>
> On 3/7/12 9:41 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
> > Failed looking for jni headers... but I wanted to compile the latest
> > version, because there have been patches applied to fix concurrent
> > loading of the dll
>
> So, did you try to fix
> Alex,
>
> On 3/6/12 6:41 PM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
> > "pcre_amd64CLEAN" : cd ".\pcre" - $(MAKE) /$(MAKEFLAGS) /F
> > ".\pcre.amd64" RECURSE=1 CLEAN + $(MAKE) /$(MAKEFLAGS) /F
> > ".\pcre.amd64" CFG="pcre.amd64
Hi
I am trying to compile the latest version from svn. (I have started a new
thread at it a different topic)
I have downloaded the latest trunk version, made a patch to Makefile.amd64
Index: Makefile.amd64
===
--- Makefile.amd64
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker [mailto:alex.sa...@yieldbroker.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2012 9:35 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Issues with the tomcat connector (On W2k8 + IIS7.5)
> [snip]
> I tried the x86 version
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker [mailto:alex.sa...@yieldbroker.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2012 9:30 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Issues with the tomcat connector (On W2k8 + IIS7.5)
>
>
[snip]
> .\Release_
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 March 2012 9:39 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Issues with the tomcat connector (On W2k8 + IIS7.5)
[snip]
> That's easy.
> Open VSxxx command prompt for target CPU and cd to native/iis the
> -Original Message-
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 6 March 2012 11:52 PM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Issues with the tomcat connector (On W2k8 + IIS7.5)
>
> On 03/06/2012 06:35 AM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
Hi
This is my prod setup
Client -> Internet -> IIS7.5/NLB (2 node cluster) with the 1.2.32 tomcat
connector -> 2 node tomcat cluster.
We had done a fair bit of testing on this setup enough to move into production.
But we ran into a problem ... when IIS recycle its application pool. Luckily
w
> -Original Message-
> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 12:40 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: jkstatus page
>
> > From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker [mailto:alex.sa...@yieldbroker.com]
&g
Hi
I was wondering if somebody could explain
NameAct State D F M V Acc Err
CE RE Wr Rd BusyMax Con Route RR Cd
Rs LR LE
[S] worker1 ACT OK 0 1 1 967 97659
Hi
Had an issue over the weekend, rolling out a prod system. So
Clients -> 2 x NLB+IIS+RP -> 2 x JBoss on Rhel -> DB
I have installed the tomcat connector on IIS. I had issues appear when IIS
recycled. It was setup for over lapping recycling.
It seem like the problem was load balancer lockin
[snip]
> >
> > 1) IIS reports 200 connection starting up just about instantly
>
> IIS reports or the redirector reports? Connections from client to IIS or from
> IIS to
> JBoss?
Performance monitor on W shows 200 Conncetion to IIS, netstat shows number of
connections to JBOss
[snip]
> > But
[snip]
> OpenQuantumLoopGravity.
> >>> The problem is that nobody can look at the page without changing its
> >>> content.
> >>
> >> LMAO That might be achievable.
> >>
> > Note that you could get over the issue which Chris mentioned, by
> > having the response time be random. So you would e
>> If you believe that the problem is localized around the connector have you
>> tried to bypass it to verify that assumption and create >> a baseline?
Yes, thought I mentioned we went directly to tomcat/jboss and were able to open
1000 connection within a couple of sec's
>> If you used IIS H
Hi
Hopefully this is the right list :)
I have
2 x W2k8r2 + NLB (Network load balancing) + IIS 7.5 + Tomcat Plugin => 2 x
RHEL 6.1 + Jboss 7 (I think). (not setup in JBoss cluster mode)
We have a .net client that talks to the IIS and then onto Jboss.
We have been running some tests
52 matches
Mail list logo
