> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker [mailto:[email protected]]
[snip]
>
> Hi Mladen
>
> Q) can I presume that this new version will not interfere with an old version
> 1.2.32 ? as the mutex name used in this new one 1.2.34 wasn't used in 1.2.32 ?
This has me thinking and think I have found another bug. :)
Our setup is IIS 7.5 setup as a Reverse proxy. We run PRD, UAT through here.
Trying to treat this an infrastructure box. We have 2 in a NLB setup
For each environment I have a separate web server and directory setup so
C:\ABC\
Prod\
Ajpconfig\
UAT\
Ajpconfig\
In each environment I have a ajpconfig directory where I put my dll and I keep
all my config files for just that environment.
The idea was that I could have different version of the tomcat connector thus
test stuff out in UAT and then move on to PRD.
BUT there is no way to set the name space used in the tomcat connector in
relation to the Shared Memory or to semaphore.
So Global\\JK_ISAPI_REDIRECT_MUTEX is used by all tomcat connectors (the ones
in prod and the ones in UAT)
And I would presume the Shared Memory would also be shared between the 2 ?
Quote from the doco !
" The ISAPI redirector can read it's configuration from a properties file
instead of the registry. This has the advantage that you can use multiple ISAPI
redirectors with independent configurations on the same server. The redirector
will check for the properties file during initialisation, and use it in
preference to the registry if present."
You can't do this with the IIS connector and with multiple processes (web
gardens)!
Could I make a bug/feature request to add something like
Shm_namespace
To the isapi_redirect.properties file and have this value post fixed to the
shared memory name and the semaphore handle... Doesn't make sense if configured
via the registry
I have create a bugzilla for this
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947 basically outlining
what I have here. The one thing I am not sure of is how much of a problem that
is...
The config files for uat and prd have different tomcat destinations, but the
load balancer and worker names are the same !! The pathing is different though
The previous bug which I think this version fixes is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52659 which I guess can be
closed
Thanks
>
> Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker [mailto:[email protected]]
[snip]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
