Fantastic! Thanks for the clarification.
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:17:17 -0600, Tim Lucia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Rob Bugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:22 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>&g
the session id to see which Tomcat to send
it to?
Regards,
Rob
-Original Message-
>From: Hassan Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Feb 6, 2007 4:24 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List , Rob Bugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Load Balancing Configuration
>
>On 2/6/
Hello All,
I currently have the following load balancing configuration: Apache with mod_jk
and 2 Tomcat servers and Apache acts as the load balancer for the two Tomcat
servers. I'm concerned about the single point of failure with Apache, however.
Is there an alternate configuration that, for i
t;Sent: Feb 6, 2007 2:00 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List , Rob Bugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Session Affinity and Session Replication
>
>On 2/6/07, Rob Bugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> All the documentation I've read to date indicates not to use sticky
&g
Hello All,
I'm trying to get a better understanding when to use Session Affinity and
Session Replication and have a question. Let me set my question up by
describing my configuration. It consists of an Apache server with mod_jk and
two Tomcat servers, where the Apache server is configured to lo
