Re: tomcat 7.0.100 AJP connector with mod_jk on another host

2020-03-05 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello, > If you don't set secretRequired="false" properly then at start time Tomcat > will complain if there is no specified "secret" attribute. > If it doesn't complain then most probably you are testing again with the > wrong server.xml or old version of Tomcat. the issue seems to be that

Re: tomcat 7.0.100 AJP connector with mod_jk on another host

2020-03-05 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello Martin, > > This should be: secretRequired="false". > > This attribute has been renamed recently. I just looked at my notes, and I tried that already yesterday night. Still facing the same problem with 403. Might it be possible that I need to use a secret in order to access ajp from

Re: tomcat 7.0.100 AJP connector with mod_jk on another host

2020-03-05 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello Martin, > This should be: secretRequired="false". > This attribute has been renamed recently. thanks. I'll test later and let you know how it went. Cheers, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: tomcat 7.0.100 AJP connector with mod_jk on another host

2020-03-04 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello, the problem was that I edited the wrong server.xml. The one that was not used. So now that I figured that out, settings these two settings help.

tomcat 7.0.100 AJP connector with mod_jk on another host

2020-03-04 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello, I've just upgraded to tomcat7 (7.0.100) afterwards I'm unable to reconfigure it to the pre 7.0.100 behaviour where AJP connector listens on the public ip address in order to use it with mod_jk. Can someone help me out to make it works again? My server.xml is:

mod_jk taking a single tomcat-worker offline for software maintenance

2008-01-20 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello, I have mod_jk version 1:1.2.18-3etch1 (which comes with Debian Etch) as loadbalancer in front of four tomcats version 5.5.20-2etch2 that do not duplicate sessions because of their size (100Mbyte per session; 120 - 500 users). My workers.property looks the following: worker.list=router,

Re: mod_jk taking a single tomcat-worker offline for softwaremaintenance

2008-01-20 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Rainer, No, the design of mod_jk is stateless w.r.t. sessions. There are only the obvious solutions, i.e. assuming that after some time of disabling (time depending on typical session use cases like 10 minutes or an hour) you stop the worker and thereby redirect users that still try to use