I have 3 physical servers, all 3 running tomcat6 and the 2 web
applications (one for local, one for www) just fine. Two of these have
apache web servers (local and www), both configured and running static
content by themselves just fine.
Ideally, I want the 3 tomcat6 instances to be a lb
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Tim,
Tim Alberts schrieb:
I have 3 physical servers, all 3 running tomcat6 and the 2 web
applications (one for local, one for www) just fine. Two of these
have apache web servers (local and www), both configured and running
static content by themselves just fine
I'm setting up Tomcat6 on Linux and want it to start on boot. I use the
following init script:
#!/bin/sh
# description: Tomcat 6.0 web application server
# chkconfig: 2345 99 00
case $1 in
'start')
export JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/default
/opt/apache/apache-tomcat-6.0.16/bin/startup.sh
I'm in the process of teaching myself the Realms configuration for
Tomcat and have a couple questions that after hours of reading and
testing I could determine, but this list can hopefully save me some
research time. Reading the documentation at:
That's what I was missing, thank you. Although I think adding a
reference to this in the mod_jk configuration might be helpful? Say
somewhere in the page:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/loadbalancers.html
Rainer Jung wrote:
Concerning the load balancer worker: you
I have two tomcat servers (5.5.23) and running mod_jk (1.2.20) with load
balancing behind apache. I have a web application that needs to
maintain session information. What I'm seeing is that the load balance
is alternating requests between the servers equally, as expected, but
sessions are
Well I found one problem with my workers.properties, but it didn't fix
my problem. I used the deprecated 'balanced_workers' on my load
balancer configuration instead of the balance_workers. So I'm still
stuck, any suggestions?
Tim Alberts wrote:
I have two tomcat servers (5.5.23
I'm have a tomcat5.5 system running and seems to be working absolutely
fine with one exception.
When I deploy my .war files with the Manager application it seems to
completely ignore the /WEB-INF/context.xml file. What do I do? My
context.xml file is in the .war file and contains:
?xml
Hassan Schroeder wrote:
On 11/15/06, Tim Alberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I deploy my .war files with the Manager application it seems to
completely ignore the /WEB-INF/context.xml file. What do I do?
1) put it in META-INF/context.xml where it belongs :-) and
Sorry, I typed
As originally stated -- it's the name of the WAR file.
Please excuse my ignorance, but you can't make a filename:
/path/to/my/webapp/app.war? How do I name the file to add the context
or can it be done?
-
To start a new
David Smith wrote:
As I remember you wanted an involved path -- ie
path/to/my/webapp/my.jsp ...
Use the path as the war's filename replacing all the / characters with #
symbols. Should work
Well before we continue, thank you for the help...
However it's not going well. I renamed the
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Tim Alberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Manager deploy uploaded war - doesn't use the
/WEB-INF/context.xml
However it's not going well. I renamed the 'app.war' file as
'path#to#myapp#app.war' and the Manager application took it
and said
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Tim Alberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Manager deploy uploaded war - doesn't use the
/WEB-INF/context.xml
However it's not going well. I renamed the 'app.war' file as
'path#to#myapp#app.war' and the Manager application took it
and said
Testing. Seem to have some email problems...please disregard.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14 matches
Mail list logo
