Yep that is it. You are using the old BIO AJP connector based on the
classes you are loading. Hmm. Not what I was expecting. It might be
worth taking a look at this bug:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189
The problem is that we need a test case to investigate this but the
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/03/2011 23:15, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/03/2011 22:06, SQ wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/03/2011 21:05, SQ wrote:
Environment:
Solaris 10
Apache 2.2.16
mod_jk 1.2.31 -- Tomcat 5.5.30
JVM 1.6.0_14
Which AJP connector are you using?
On 22/03/2011 10:24, André Warnier wrote:
The following is no criticism, and is meant as a constructive comment :
snip/
Patches still welcome, mm ?
Yep. The offer to help anyone set up an environment so they can create
and test patches still stands.
Mark
I too didn't realize there was a difference in connectors. Thanks for the
clarification.
Here is the startup info on the connector:
[Loaded org.apache.catalina.connector.Response from
file:/usr/local/apache-tomcat-5.5.30/server
/lib/catalina.jar]
[Loaded org.apache.jk.core.JkHandler from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SQ,
On 3/22/2011 12:54 PM, SQ wrote:
I too didn't realize there was a difference in connectors. Thanks for the
clarification.
Here is the startup info on the connector:
Yeah, that's not what Mark is looking for. When you first start up
Tomcat,
On 22/03/2011 16:54, SQ wrote:
I too didn't realize there was a difference in connectors. Thanks for the
clarification.
Here is the startup info on the connector:
[Loaded org.apache.catalina.connector.Response from
file:/usr/local/apache-tomcat-5.5.30/server
/lib/catalina.jar]
Yep that is it. You are using the old BIO AJP connector based on the
classes you are loading. Hmm. Not what I was expecting. It might be
worth taking a look at this bug:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189
The problem is that we need a test case to investigate this but the
