On 30/06/2010 09:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/06/2010 22:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/06/2010 15:16, John Wu wrote:
Hi Mark,
I just got a chance to test it on the Beta release. It's still broken,
with
a slightly different exception message.
Confirmed. I'm pretty sure JSF is doing the right
On 29/06/2010 22:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/06/2010 15:16, John Wu wrote:
Hi Mark,
I just got a chance to test it on the Beta release. It's still broken,
with
a slightly different exception message.
Confirmed. I'm pretty sure JSF is doing the right thing here and that I
need to read the
On 21/06/2010 15:16, John Wu wrote:
Hi Mark,
I just got a chance to test it on the Beta release. It's still broken, with
a slightly different exception message.
Confirmed. I'm pretty sure JSF is doing the right thing here and that I
need to read the spec more carefully. I'll post an update
Hi Mark,
I just got a chance to test it on the Beta release. It's still broken, with
a slightly different exception message.
javax.faces.el.MethodNotFoundException: javax.el.MethodNotFoundException:
/helloWorld.xhtml @15,85
action=#{helloWorldController.doSomething(helloWorldModel)}: Method not
Hi Mark,
The fix of to derive the type directly from the value which ... sounds not
a solution. In a slightly more complex scenario, the fix still fails.
Say the method signature is public * theMethod(TheSupperType o) and
calling the method in EL like
On 10/06/2010 14:42, John Wu wrote:
Hi Mark,
The fix of to derive the type directly from the value which ... sounds not
a solution. In a slightly more complex scenario, the fix still fails.
Say the method signature is public * theMethod(TheSupperType o) and
calling the method in EL like
That sounds even better. I'm looking forward to test the modified impl in the
next RC/release.
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/06/2010 14:42, John Wu wrote:
Hi Mark,
The fix of to derive the type directly from the value which ... sounds
not
a solution. In a slightly more complex scenario,
On 26/05/2010 01:22, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 25/05/2010 20:35, John Wu wrote:
Same failure observed on Tomcat 7 RC1 and RC2.
I can now reproduce this. The fix is next on my todo list.
Note I echo Konstantin's comments about trying to get EL 2.2 working in
Tomcat 6. If it works, great - but
Just to follow up. Same failure happens on Tomcat RC3.
n828cl wrote:
From: John Wu [mailto:johnwu@gmail.com]
Subject: EL 2.2 in Tomcat 7 RC1/RC2 does not fully support method
invocation, such as
#{helloWorldController.doSomething(helloWorldModel)}
I tried to use JSF 2.0 + Facelets
I tried to use JSF 2.0 + Facelets (no JSP at all) in Tomcat 6 with EL 2.2
(extracted from Tomcat 7 RC2), and failed. see
http://old.nabble.com/MyFaces-2.0.0-doest-not-fully-support-EL-2.2-method-invocation-tt28669825.html
and
From: John Wu [mailto:johnwu@gmail.com]
Subject: EL 2.2 in Tomcat 7 RC1/RC2 does not fully support method
invocation, such as
#{helloWorldController.doSomething(helloWorldModel)}
I tried to use JSF 2.0 + Facelets (no JSP at all) in Tomcat 6
with EL 2.2 (extracted from Tomcat 7 RC2),
Issue stays on Tomcat 7 RC1 and RC2. I can't download RC3 at the moment,
will try it tomorrow.
John Wu
n828cl wrote:
From: John Wu [mailto:johnwu@gmail.com]
Subject: EL 2.2 in Tomcat 7 RC1/RC2 does not fully support method
invocation, such as
2010/5/25 John Wu johnwu@gmail.com:
I tried to use JSF 2.0 + Facelets (no JSP at all) in Tomcat 6 with EL 2.2
(extracted from Tomcat 7 RC2), and failed.
You cannot cut some random part of Tomcat 7,
drop it into Tomcat 6 and expect it to work.
Regardless of what Tomcat 7 version you are
Same failure observed on Tomcat 7 RC1 and RC2.
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/5/25 John Wu johnwu@gmail.com:
I tried to use JSF 2.0 + Facelets (no JSP at all) in Tomcat 6 with EL 2.2
(extracted from Tomcat 7 RC2), and failed.
You cannot cut some random part of Tomcat 7,
drop it
On 25/05/2010 20:35, John Wu wrote:
Same failure observed on Tomcat 7 RC1 and RC2.
I can now reproduce this. The fix is next on my todo list.
Note I echo Konstantin's comments about trying to get EL 2.2 working in
Tomcat 6. If it works, great - but it will be by luck rather than
design. If it
15 matches
Mail list logo