-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 4/22/2010 5:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/4/23 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
I'd love to see the code that enforces this.
Search for applicationDispatcher.specViolation.request and
Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote in message
news:4bcf5f41.6060...@christopherschultz.net...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas
On 21/04/2010 19:52, André Warnier wrote:
Hi.
A while ago, I wrote a servlet filter which has served me well since, to
wrap a servlet for which I do not have nor can obtain the source code,
and of which I only generally know what it does.
Now it seems that with a new version of this servlet,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net wrote:
Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote in message
news:4bcf5f41.6060...@christopherschultz.net...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
It's pretty inaccessible for novice Java programmers, but you could use
the proxy API which is [just] about the coolest thing available in
Java IMO.
If it does a forward or include done the line,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
It's pretty inaccessible for novice Java programmers, but you could use
the proxy API which is [just] about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
won't work with any remotely recent version of Tomcat. These
versions enforce the spec requirement that the Request has to be a
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
won't work with any remotely recent
2010/4/23 Kris Schneider kschnei...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 4/22/2010 2:37 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
If [the request/filter] does a forward or include done the line, this
won't work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris,
On 4/22/2010 4:48 PM, Kris Schneider wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
The following filter works as expected on Tomcat 6.0.26 (some changes
were required to make it actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 4/22/2010 4:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/4/23 Kris Schneider kschnei...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 4/22/2010
2010/4/23 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin,
On 4/22/2010 4:53 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/4/23 Kris Schneider kschnei...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Christopher Schultz
Hi.
A while ago, I wrote a servlet filter which has served me well since, to
wrap a servlet for which I do not have nor can obtain the source code,
and of which I only generally know what it does.
Now it seems that with a new version of this servlet, the servlet itself
crashes when wrapped by
On 21/04/2010 19:52, André Warnier wrote:
Hi.
A while ago, I wrote a servlet filter which has served me well since, to
wrap a servlet for which I do not have nor can obtain the source code,
and of which I only generally know what it does.
Now it seems that with a new version of this servlet,
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
reverse-engineering. So is there something that just lists the standard
calls/methods used
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
reverse-engineering. So is there something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:24 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under suspicion of
reverse-engineering. So is
On 21/04/2010 20:46, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
anything of the kind, I would not want to even come under
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD and decompile it.
Thanks. But although my intentions are not obnoxious nor illegal nor
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 4/21/2010 3:46 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/04/2010 20:24, André Warnier wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
...
I'd just use JAD
Mark, Chris and Kris, thanks.
You have all impressed the hell out of me.
You have also lost me.. at a guess about 50 lines ago.
But I get the idea, and it is nice to learn that such things exist.
I also believe this may be helpful to someone else some day looking for
a solution to a case much
class Foo {
private static int;
static {
a = 100;
}
Foo() {
}
}
Class.forName(package.Foo).newInstance();
The static init block of Foo is not called.
I am using Java 1.5 update14. It is a bug?
Thanks
On Feb 20, 2008 10:47 AM, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
class Foo {
private static int;
static {
a = 100;
}
Foo() {
}
}
Class.forName(package.Foo).newInstance();
The static init block of Foo is not called.
I am using Java 1.5
From: Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: a java question - static initialization
class Foo {
private static int;
static {
a = 100;
}
Foo() {
}
}
Class.forName(package.Foo).newInstance();
The static init block of Foo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kenneth,
Kenneth Westelinck wrote:
| Did a quick test on 1.6.0 update 2 and the static block does get called. I
| guess this is a bug.
Er, this code doesn't look like it should compile:
| class Foo {
|
| private static int;
|
Isn't there an
?
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Peter Crowther
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:22 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Java Question
From: Andrew English
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have looked for the filenames.* on all the
servers
From: Andrew English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there anyway to check this theory?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Crowther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I suspect an operations issue. Has someone configured a revision
control system (such as CVS or Subversion) on the
: Java Question
From: Andrew English
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have looked for the filenames.* on all the
servers
including the linux
ones and not come up with anything except for
what's on the
two servers.
I suspect an operations issue. Has someone
configured a revision
Does anyone know of a mailing list were I can ask some java related
questions?
The number one question I have is if it's possible to write code within
Java that changes all your HTML files back to their original default?
A client of mine runs, dare I say it here JBoss 2.4 and I found two
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Robert Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:10 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Java Question
Are the pages static or is there some process, servlet, script, or
something
else that creates these? There could also
List
Subject: RE: Java Question
I have looked for the filenames.* on all the servers including the linux
ones and not come up with anything except for what's on the two servers.
I have not had a chance to check all the jar files, are ear files like
jar files if so what's a good tool for opening both
From: Andrew English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have looked for the filenames.* on all the servers
including the linux
ones and not come up with anything except for what's on the
two servers.
I suspect an operations issue. Has someone configured a revision
control system (such as CVS or
Is there anyway to check this theory?
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Peter Crowther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:22 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Java Question
From: Andrew English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have looked for the filenames
search for USB-Java and javaspain in www.yahoogroups.com
Mauricio Fernandez A.
Ingeniero de Sistemas
Universidad Autonoma de Manizales
-Mensaje original-
De: Andrew English [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: miercoles, 22 febrero, 2006 16:12
Para: Tomcat Users List
Asunto: Java
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:12 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Java Question
Does anyone know of a mailing list were I can ask some java related
questions?
The number one question I have is if it's possible to write code within
Java that changes all your HTML files
(Cognizant)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 5:18 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Java Question
Andrew,
You will be surprised but here is what it is:
JBoss is actually sending the calls made to your production server to
the test server. This is because
of data(code written to
do it), it is about the only way data is going to be removed.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: Andrew English [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 5:47 PM
Subject: RE: Java Question
Thanks for the info
is the oldest
version they have information on. :(
Thanks
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Parsons Technical Services [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:15 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Java Question
Okay. Now for a few of my hair brain ideas. Every
39 matches
Mail list logo
