Just a heads up to the Tomcat team - I switched all our comet handling to
Jetty, and these issues are resolved. Something is definitely amiss in the
NIO connector.
Regards,
Matt Tyson
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 31/12/2011 16:35, Matthew Tyson
On 29/12/2011 19:22, Matthew Tyson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Pid p...@pidster.com wrote:
On 29/12/2011 17:27, Matthew Tyson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Tyson
matthewcarlty...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefan Mayr
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:04 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Matthew Tyson matthewcarlty...@gmail.com wrote:
That's right, there is an f5 load balancer. The valve is used to keep
track of whether the request was via HTTPS or not.
What happens if you go direct to Tomcat and bypass the F5?
On 31/12/2011 16:35, Matthew Tyson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:04 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Matthew Tyson matthewcarlty...@gmail.com wrote:
That's right, there is an f5 load balancer. The valve is used to keep
track of whether the request was via HTTPS or not.
What happens if you
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Tyson
matthewcarlty...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefan Mayr ste...@mayr-stefan.dewrote:
Am 28.12.2011 10:04, schrieb ma...@apache.org:
Matthew Tysonmatthewcarltyson@gmail.**com matthewcarlty...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Pid p...@pidster.com wrote:
On 29/12/2011 17:27, Matthew Tyson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Tyson
matthewcarlty...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefan Mayr ste...@mayr-stefan.de
wrote:
Am 28.12.2011 10:04,
On 29/12/2011 17:27, Matthew Tyson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Matthew Tyson
matthewcarlty...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefan Mayr ste...@mayr-stefan.dewrote:
Am 28.12.2011 10:04, schrieb ma...@apache.org:
Matthew Tysonmatthewcarltyson@gmail.**com
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 11:22 -0800, Matthew Tyson wrote:
BIG SNIP
How an empty 200 response could be generated
without executing the logging statement here is a mystery.
Do you still have that MonitoringFilter configured in the web app?
Perhaps it is short circuiting the chain.
protected
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Tim Watts t...@cliftonfarm.org wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 11:22 -0800, Matthew Tyson wrote:
BIG SNIP
How an empty 200 response could be generated
without executing the logging statement here is a mystery.
Do you still have that MonitoringFilter
Matthew Tyson matthewcarlty...@gmail.com wrote:
That's right, there is an f5 load balancer. The valve is used to keep
track of whether the request was via HTTPS or not.
What happens if you go direct to Tomcat and bypass the F5?
tcpdump seems to confirm the same. What are you thinking?
Am 28.12.2011 10:04, schrieb ma...@apache.org:
Matthew Tysonmatthewcarlty...@gmail.com wrote:
That's right, there is an f5 load balancer. The valve is used to keep
track of whether the request was via HTTPS or not.
What happens if you go direct to Tomcat and bypass the F5?
tcpdump seems
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Stefan Mayr ste...@mayr-stefan.de wrote:
Am 28.12.2011 10:04, schrieb ma...@apache.org:
Matthew Tysonmatthewcarltyson@gmail.**com matthewcarlty...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's right, there is an f5 load balancer. The valve is used to keep
track of whether
On 25/12/2011 02:17, Matthew Tyson wrote:
INFO 2011-12-24 10:25:35,578 COMET REQUEST: 75.149.42.46 POST null |
TRACE:
java.lang.Throwable
at org.cometd.server.CometdServlet.service(CometdServlet.java:149)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:722)
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 25/12/2011 02:17, Matthew Tyson wrote:
INFO 2011-12-24 10:25:35,578 COMET REQUEST: 75.149.42.46 POST null |
TRACE:
java.lang.Throwable
at
org.cometd.server.CometdServlet.service(CometdServlet.java:149)
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Stefan Mayr ste...@mayr-stefan.de wrote:
Am 24.12.2011 00:39, schrieb Matthew Tyson:
Hello,
We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling
connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.23
definitely improved
2011/12/25 Matthew Tyson matthewcarlty...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Matthew Tyson
matthewcarlty...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 23/12/2011 23:39, Matthew Tyson wrote:
Hello,
We have been having quite a few
On 23/12/2011 23:39, Matthew Tyson wrote:
Hello,
We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling
connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.23
definitely improved things, but we are still seeing major issues.
Glad to hear things are getting
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 23/12/2011 23:39, Matthew Tyson wrote:
Hello,
We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling
connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.23
definitely improved things,
Am 24.12.2011 19:33, schrieb Matthew Tyson:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org wrote:
On 23/12/2011 23:39, Matthew Tyson wrote:
Hello,
We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling
connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Upgrading to
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Matthew Tyson
matthewcarlty...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 23/12/2011 23:39, Matthew Tyson wrote:
Hello,
We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling
connections in Tomcat,
Hello,
We have been having quite a few problems with using long-polling
connections in Tomcat, via the NIO connector. Upgrading to Tomcat 7.0.23
definitely improved things, but we are still seeing major issues.
The problems only crop up after a couple minutes under some load (modest
load,
21 matches
Mail list logo
