Re: Missing application web.xml

2005-12-04 Thread hv @ Fashion Content
I had the same experience. Just to illustrate here is my build target, quite straightforward:

Re: Missing application web.xml

2005-12-03 Thread Rob Hills
Hi Henrik, On 4 Dec 2005 at 4:38, hv @ Fashion Content wrote: > > context.xml: > > > > Where is this context.xml file located? The docBase attribute must > not be used unless the tag is inside server.xml or > conf/Catalina//.xml; the only time a file named > context.xml is valid is inside the

Re: Missing application web.xml

2005-12-03 Thread hv @ Fashion Content
Thanks for the advice mate. I did indeed have an empty Context tag. Changing it didn't make the Missing application web.xml message go away though. I guess I will have to upgrade to 5.5.12 tomorrow. "Rob Hills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi Henrik, > > O

Re: Missing application web.xml

2005-12-03 Thread Rob Hills
Hi Henrik, On 4 Dec 2005 at 3:33, hv @ Fashion Content wrote: > Sigh :( > > Gawd I hate changing Tomcat configurations, it always goes pearshaped. > > Why does Tomcat say that there is no web.xml when it is in the war > file when I unzip it??? > > And how come the default behaviour is to show

Re: Missing application web.xml

2005-12-03 Thread hv @ Fashion Content
> Why does Tomcat say that there is no web.xml when it is in > the war file when I unzip it??? >Is it inside WEB-INF (which must be in caps)? It is generated by the Ant WAR task, so yes it is, and I verified it as well. context.xml is in META-INF. > And how come the default behaviour is to show

Re: Missing application web.xml

2005-12-03 Thread hv @ Fashion Content
> Why does Tomcat say that there is no web.xml when it is in the war file > when > I unzip it??? > partial server.xml: > deployOnStartup="true" autoDeploy="false" xmlValidation="true"> >Have you always had xmlValidation set to true or did you change that >recently? I have been banging my hea

RE: Missing application web.xml

2005-12-03 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hv @ > Fashion Content > Subject: Missing application web.xml > > Why does Tomcat say that there is no web.xml when it is in > the war file when I unzip it??? Is it inside WEB-INF (which must be in caps)? > And how come the default behaviour

Re: Missing application web.xml

2005-12-03 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 12/3/05, hv @ Fashion Content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why does Tomcat say that there is no web.xml when it is in the war file when > I unzip it??? > partial server.xml: > deployOnStartup="true" autoDeploy="false" xmlValidation="true"> Have you always had xmlValidation set to true or did

RE: Missing application web.xml, using defaults only - is this a Tomcat bug?

2005-10-20 Thread Rob Hills
Hi Chuck, On 20 Oct 2005 at 8:44, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > > From: Rob Hills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Missing application web.xml, using defaults only > > - is this a Tomcat bug? > > > > From the my reading of the Documentation, docB

RE: Missing application web.xml, using defaults only - is this a Tomcat bug?

2005-10-20 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Rob Hills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Missing application web.xml, using defaults only > - is this a Tomcat bug? > > From the my reading of the Documentation, docBase and Path are > mandatory attributes of the Context element for Tomcat 5.0. Check the

Re: Missing application web.xml, using defaults only - is this a Tomcat bug?

2005-10-20 Thread Rob Hills
Hi All, On 17 Oct 2005 at 11:23, Rob Hills wrote: > I am currently using Tomcat 5.5.9 on Window XP Pro in my development > environment and I believe I have finally tracked down the > cause of a problem that has been plaguing me for some time. Until recently > I've not had the time to do the t

RE: Missing application web.xml, using defaults only - is this a Tomcat bug?

2005-10-16 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Rob Hills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Missing application web.xml, using defaults only - > is this a Tomcat bug? > > I finally worked out that if you have a context.xml with the > following contents: > > > > > or > > > > Tomc