personal preference in this order
mod_proxy_http, mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp
rahul wrote:
Hi,
Which is the recommended connector for Apache now?
mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp (with balancer) ?
rahul
--
1. e4 _
Not sure about the interface/protocol being depricated
since there was just a new release of mod_jk 1.2.25?
Also, someone put some effort into improvments into it
2.2.6 of Apache.
I also noticed a 10% performance improvement in
request response times using mod_jk which I was told
about and proven
You may find this link helpful.it works if your using the same
versions as the article. But I think JK2 has been 'deprecated'.
http://www.roktech.net/devblog/enclosures/iis6-Tomcat5-JK2.pdf
~Charlie
The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of
thinking with
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
personal preference in this order
mod_proxy_http, mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp
I'm interested: why choose mod_proxy_http over mod_jk?
ease of configuration, no API nor
Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:56 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache connectors for tomcat
I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched from
ajp to mod_jk and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster
for me.
-Tony
--- Christopher Schultz [EMAIL
To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Apache connectors for tomcat
I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched from ajp to mod_jk
and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster for me.
-Tony
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Apache connectors for tomcat
Not sure about the interface/protocol being depricated
It's mod_jk2 that has been abandoned for over two years; mod_jk is still
in very active development. Any documentation or recommendations
Thanks for the clarification.
-Tony
--- Caldarale, Charles R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Apache connectors for tomcat
Not sure about the interface/protocol being
depricated
It's mod_jk2 that has been abandoned for over two
.
~Charlie
The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of
thinking with which we created them.
- Albert Einstein
-Original Message-
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 10:19 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Apache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
personal preference in this order
mod_proxy_http, mod_jk, mod_proxy_ajp
I'm interested: why choose mod_proxy_http over mod_jk?
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched from
ajp to mod_jk and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster
for me.
-Tony
--- Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
personal preference in this
-Original Message-
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 12:56 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Apache connectors for tomcat
I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched
from
ajp to mod_jk and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday,
September 28, 2007 12:56
PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Apache
connectors for tomcat
I had heard that mod_jk was faster so I switched
from ajp to mod_jk
and sure enough mod_jk was 10% faster for me.
-Tony
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
Tony Anecito wrote:
I heard that mod_jk was based off of ajp so I was
quite surprised mod_jk was faster.
Yes, mod_jk does use the AJP protocol. Why were you surprised that it
was faster? With what are you comparing it?
- -chris
-BEGIN
Hi Chris:
1. I am instrumenting inside the servlet code, looking
at Apache web server logs then at the Rich Internet
Application (RIA)
For a typcial request for my Portal from client to
servlet for example:
1. 4.55msec inside the RIA java code after the data
was read from the SOAP message.
2.
15 matches
Mail list logo