the problem is and I have it working, if less than ideally now.
Thanks for the suggestions etc.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:36 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 9/1/2010 10:53 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
>
>> And that was working prop
that now.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:19 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> From: Maximilian Stocker [mailto:m...@talentoyster.com]
> Subject
k.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:19 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> From: Maximilian Stocker [mailto:m...@talentoyster.com]
> Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> w
> From: Maximilian Stocker [mailto:m...@talentoyster.com]
> Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> work -> /var/cache/tomcat5/work
> temp -> /var/cache/tomcat5/work
That's a bit scary - those should be separate directories. I have no idea wha
age-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10:29 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maximilian,
On 9/1/2010 10:08 AM, Maximilian Sto
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> And that was working properly? Many folks have encountered
> problems using OpenJDK with Tomcat and their webapps.
I don't think that's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maximilian,
On 9/1/2010 10:08 AM, Maximilian Stocker wrote:
> The version that was being used (using java -version) was an OpenJDK
>
> java version "1.6.0_0"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.6) (rhel-1.13.b16.el5-x86_64)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Ser
ugust 31, 2010 4:58 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
> Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> Really?
> > JVM - 1.6.0_0-b16 (Sun)
> You can probably find a n
> From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com]
> Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> Really?
> > JVM - 1.6.0_0-b16 (Sun)
> You can probably find a newer JVM than that
You're saying that just because 1.6.0_0 is approaching the fourth anniversar
On 31/08/2010 20:41, Maximilian Stocker wrote:
> Thanks for you reply.
>
> The JVM bug is an interesting possibility that I have also been wondering
> about. It was also upgraded I believe.
Really?
>> JVM - 1.6.0_0-b16 (Sun)
You can probably find a newer JVM than that, unless I'm reading your
...@unisys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> Looks like a JVM
--Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:28 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maximilian,
On 8/31/2010 2:15 PM,
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5
> Looks like a JVM bug to me.
Maybe not - see below.
> > And the last line, ExpandWar.delete continues on and on etc.
> That's w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maximilian,
On 8/31/2010 2:15 PM, Maximilian Stocker wrote:
> I have a tomcat 5.5 running on a server with redhat enterprise linux
> 5 and everything has been working for the last 7 -8 months without
> problems. On Friday the IT department "patched"
15 matches
Mail list logo