RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-09-01 Thread Maximilian Stocker
the problem is and I have it working, if less than ideally now. Thanks for the suggestions etc. -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:36 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflo

Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-09-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck, On 9/1/2010 10:53 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] >> Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > >> And that was working prop

RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-09-01 Thread Maximilian Stocker
that now. -Original Message- From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:19 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > From: Maximilian Stocker [mailto:m...@talentoyster.com] > Subject

RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-09-01 Thread Maximilian Stocker
k.caldar...@unisys.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11:19 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > From: Maximilian Stocker [mailto:m...@talentoyster.com] > Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > w

RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-09-01 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Maximilian Stocker [mailto:m...@talentoyster.com] > Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > work -> /var/cache/tomcat5/work > temp -> /var/cache/tomcat5/work That's a bit scary - those should be separate directories. I have no idea wha

RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-09-01 Thread Maximilian Stocker
age- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10:29 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Maximilian, On 9/1/2010 10:08 AM, Maximilian Sto

RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-09-01 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > And that was working properly? Many folks have encountered > problems using OpenJDK with Tomcat and their webapps. I don't think that's

Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-09-01 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Maximilian, On 9/1/2010 10:08 AM, Maximilian Stocker wrote: > The version that was being used (using java -version) was an OpenJDK > > java version "1.6.0_0" > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.6) (rhel-1.13.b16.el5-x86_64) > OpenJDK 64-Bit Ser

RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-09-01 Thread Maximilian Stocker
ugust 31, 2010 4:58 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] > Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > Really? > > JVM - 1.6.0_0-b16 (Sun) > You can probably find a n

RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-08-31 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] > Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > Really? > > JVM - 1.6.0_0-b16 (Sun) > You can probably find a newer JVM than that You're saying that just because 1.6.0_0 is approaching the fourth anniversar

Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-08-31 Thread Pid
On 31/08/2010 20:41, Maximilian Stocker wrote: > Thanks for you reply. > > The JVM bug is an interesting possibility that I have also been wondering > about. It was also upgraded I believe. Really? >> JVM - 1.6.0_0-b16 (Sun) You can probably find a newer JVM than that, unless I'm reading your

RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-08-31 Thread Maximilian Stocker
...@unisys.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:33 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > Looks like a JVM

RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-08-31 Thread Maximilian Stocker
--Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:28 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Maximilian, On 8/31/2010 2:15 PM,

RE: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-08-31 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Subject: Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5 > Looks like a JVM bug to me. Maybe not - see below. > > And the last line, ExpandWar.delete continues on and on etc. > That's w

Re: undeploy failure - stack overflow tomcat 5 on RHEL 5

2010-08-31 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Maximilian, On 8/31/2010 2:15 PM, Maximilian Stocker wrote: > I have a tomcat 5.5 running on a server with redhat enterprise linux > 5 and everything has been working for the last 7 -8 months without > problems. On Friday the IT department "patched"