-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/16/13 6:52 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> just today, i recognized a query, such as following which was
> performing very poorly, even though the JOIN was on a
> primary/foreign key, and ORDER BY on primary key (which 'should' be
> f
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Howard,
>
> On 4/15/13 4:02 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Christopher Schultz <
> > ch...@christopherschultz.n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/15/13 4:02 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Christopher Schultz <
> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
> Howard,
>
> On 4/14/13 9:53 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
I am definitely relying o
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:52 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
>
> I've had people tell me that I should run wi
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Howard,
>
> On 4/14/13 9:53 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> > I am definitely relying on user HttpSessions, and I do JPA-level
> > caching (stateme
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 4/15/2013 7:25 AM, David kerber wrote:
>
>> On 4/15/2013 10:10 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:40 AM, David kerber
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/14/2013 11:10 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/14/13 9:53 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> I am definitely relying on user HttpSessions, and I do JPA-level
> caching (statement cache and query results cache). pages are
> PrimeFaces and primefaces = xhtml, html, jquery, and
> MyFac
On 4/15/2013 7:25 AM, David kerber wrote:
On 4/15/2013 10:10 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:40 AM, David kerber
wrote:
On 4/14/2013 11:10 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mark Thomas
wrote:
On 14/04/2013 21:53, Howard W. Smith, J
On 4/15/2013 10:10 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:40 AM, David kerber wrote:
On 4/14/2013 11:10 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2013 21:53, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:40 AM, David kerber wrote:
> On 4/14/2013 11:10 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On 14/04/2013 21:53, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Christopher Schultz<
ch...@ch
On 4/14/2013 11:10 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/04/2013 21:53, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Christopher Schultz<
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SH
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/04/2013 21:53, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Christopher Schultz <
>> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Howard,
>>>
>>> On 4/11/13
On 14/04/2013 21:53, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/11/13 10:38 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Christopher Sc
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Howard,
>
> On 4/11/13 10:38 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Christopher Schultz <
> > ch...@christopherschultz.ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/11/13 10:38 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Christopher Schultz <
> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
>> Your heap settings should be tailored to your environment and
>> usage scenarios.
>
> Int
Chris,
My apologies for late response; just realized earlier this afternoon that I
didn't respond.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Howard,
>
> On 4/3/13 4:15 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saumil,
On 4/3/13 2:16 PM, saumil shah wrote:
> I did change in Tomcat 6.0/Conf/server.xml unpackWARs="false" and
> autoDeploy="false"
Why? I don't believe I mentioned either of those settings...
> but the logs still complaint about the Deploying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Howard,
On 4/3/13 4:15 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christopher Schultz <
> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
>> If you don't re-deploy your webapp, then daily rolling Tomcat
>> restarts are not necessary.
On 3 Apr 2013, at 15:36, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Saumil,
>
> Please try to keep discussions on the mailing list to everyone can
> benefit.
>
> On 4/2/13 6:48 PM, saumil shah wrote:
>> For some reason ...I do not see Java process in Task M
e: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:35:50 -0400
>> From: ch...@christopherschultz.net
>> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>> CC: saumil...@hotmail.com
>> Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
Chris,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
> > I understand its not a premanent solution but as a stopgap for now
> > ? If so , we can put it as part of daily cycle to bounce tomcat6.
>
C: saumil...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Saumil,
>
> Please try to keep discussions on the mailing list to everyone can
> benefit.
>
> On 4/2/13 6:48 PM, saumil s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saumil,
Please try to keep discussions on the mailing list to everyone can
benefit.
On 4/2/13 6:48 PM, saumil shah wrote:
> For some reason ...I do not see Java process in Task Manager in
> Windows, just Tomcat6 process. I am assuming killing Tomc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saumil,
On 4/2/13 5:01 PM, saumil shah wrote:
> Thanks so much Chris this has been very very helpful ...
> appreciate you taking time out. Would stopping Tomcat6 service in
> Windows 2008 R2 take care of this "orphan threads" if you will ?
> Also,
n but as a stopgap for now ? If so , we
can put it as part of daily cycle to bounce tomcat6.
Many thanks.
> Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:58:53 -0400
> From: ch...@christopherschultz.net
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
>
> -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Saumil,
On 4/1/13 11:01 PM, saumil shah wrote:
> I recently deployed one of the COTS products SAP Business Objects.
> When the product was deployed , everything seemed to run fine but
> yesterday we started experiencing "Service is unavailable" er
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: saumil shah [mailto:saumil...@hotmail.com]
Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
Don't top post - it's annoying and confusing.
can we deploy 32 bit web applications on 64 bit tomcat?
The point being made is that your questi
> From: saumil shah [mailto:saumil...@hotmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
Don't top post - it's annoying and confusing.
> can we deploy 32 bit web applications on 64 bit tomcat?
The point being made is that your question doesn't mak
Thanks andre..can we deploy 32 bit web applications on 64 bit tomcat?
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier
Sent: 2 Apr 2013 08:51:00 GMT
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Re : Memory leak in Tomcat 6.0.35 ( 64 bit)
saumil shah wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I recently dep
saumil shah wrote:
Hello there,
I recently deployed one of the COTS products SAP Business Objects. When the product was
deployed , everything seemed to run fine but yesterday we started experiencing
"Service is unavailable" error , upon enabling DEBUG logs in Tomcat , we saw
the error below w
Saumil,
On 2.4.2013 5:01, saumil shah wrote:
I recently deployed one of the COTS products SAP Business Objects. When the product was
deployed , everything seemed to run fine but yesterday we started experiencing
"Service is unavailable" error , upon enabling DEBUG logs in Tomcat , we saw
the
Hello there,
I recently deployed one of the COTS products SAP Business Objects. When the
product was deployed , everything seemed to run fine but yesterday we started
experiencing "Service is unavailable" error , upon enabling DEBUG logs in
Tomcat , we saw the error below with memory leak messa
32 matches
Mail list logo
