which was never any dev delay cause.
Regards
karthik
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 9:38 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
Karthik Nanjangude wrote:
...
When
On 09/12/2009 19:26, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 12/9/2009 1:22 PM, Pid wrote:
On 09/12/2009 18:01, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Pid,
On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote:
[r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a
Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP
Hi
We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux
1) In case of Windows the Catalina. out is not generated in /log
folder while on Linux the same is generated on every start
2) Tomcat on windows is Slow compared to Linux in request /response
Why
2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com
We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux
Just to check: in both cases, you downloaded the same installation files
from http://tomcat.apache.org and installed them?
Exactly the same JVM revision on both machines
Karthik Nanjangude wrote:
Hi
We have deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20on Windows / Linux
1) In case of Windows the Catalina. out is not generated in /log
folder while on Linux the same is generated on every start
2) Tomcat on windows is Slow compared to Linux in request
-
From: peter.crowth...@googlemail.com [mailto:peter.crowth...@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Peter Crowther
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:04 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com
We
2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com
Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from
http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20.zip
OK.
RAM is 2 GB on Linux on Windows is 1.5 GB
No extra applications are running when the same was executed
On 09/12/2009 14:12, Peter Crowther wrote:
2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangudekarthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com
Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from
http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/bin/apache-tomcat-6.0.20.zip
OK.
RAM is 2 GB on Linux on Windows is 1.5 GB
No extra
Karthik Nanjangude wrote:
Also, both Windows 2000 and Java 1.5 are in the no longer supported
Off the topic - Does this mean Every Hardware /S/w for 6 months needs
replacement
Not really off the topic, if you are talking about comparisons and
benchmarks.
Peter Crowther wrote:
...
- A much older JVM, I think - this looks like the original 1.5 release,
compared to 1.5.0_18 on Linux.
- The client VM rather than the server VM is running.
I would expect both of these to slow down the Windows box.
Especially the client vs server vm, IME.
D
] On
Behalf Of Peter Crowther
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: deployed same TOMCAT 6.0.20 on Windows / Linux
2009/12/9 Karthik Nanjangude karthik.nanjang...@xius-bcgi.com
Same Tomcat 6.0.20 from
http://opensource.become.com/apache/tomcat/tomcat-6
Karthik Nanjangude wrote:
Hi
As Andre points out, you also don't give any information on the tests you're
running, which makes it difficult to know what you're actually comparing.
For example, if your webapp accesses an external database, the version of the
database software will make a
Karthik Nanjangude wrote:
...
When something is in Production it really gets pickles to upgrade the Jdk /OS ,
Realy worried :(
Karthik,
generally speaking, the gurus on this list - of which I am not - tend to
be sceptical about benchmarks. That is because, as Mark indicated in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote:
[r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a
Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT
2006
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
So you appear to have 2 processors in the linux machine.
Or maybe three: two
On 09/12/2009 18:01, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote:
[r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a
Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT
2006
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
So you appear to have 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 12/9/2009 1:22 PM, Pid wrote:
On 09/12/2009 18:01, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Pid,
On 12/9/2009 9:15 AM, Pid wrote:
[r...@teleglb bin]# uname -a
Linux teleglb.xius.ltd 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:27:17 EDT
2006
i686 i686 i386
16 matches
Mail list logo