21:51, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit :
interesting. I can definitely use this as a reference if (ever)
necessary,
thanks.
which brings me to my next question,
//
// take care next strategies can break multiple calls on the
facade
I'm trying to use HA-JDBC[1] with TomEE to have a cluster of at least 2
databases. As per documentation and forum discussion, I have the following:
--- tomee.xml ---
Resource id=jdbc/mcmsJta type=javax.sql.DataSource
factory=net.sf.hajdbc.sql.DataSourceFactory
cluster=cluster
UserName
.
still getting errors, but they are related to ha-jdbc, now.
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm trying to use HA-JDBC[1] with TomEE to have a cluster of at least 2
databases. As per documentation and forum discussion, I have the following
now, i know, thanks! :)
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Why workaround? That how it works
Le 2 nov. 2013 15:48, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit :
The following is the workaround:
Resource id=jdbc/mcmsJta type
Per [Avoid properties conflict when configuring TomEE DataSource][1], I
added ignoreDefaultValues=true to Resource in tomee.xml,
Resource id=jdbc/mcmsJta type=javax.sql.DataSource
JdbcDriver net.sf.hajdbc.sql.DataSource
IgnoreDefaultValues true
JtaManaged true
jmxEnabled true
LogSql
using xxx as property attribute (factory for instance)
Le 2 nov. 2013 18:10, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Per [Avoid properties conflict when configuring TomEE DataSource][1], I
added ignoreDefaultValues=true to Resource in tomee.xml,
Resource id=jdbc/mcmsJta type
/5f4dc302/
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
wrote:
okay, I'm seeing what you said (not get jta as easily, when using
context.xml). thanks.
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
If you use context.xml
:
When tomee will target javaee 7
Le 30 oct. 2013 05:26, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Mark, since you mentioned somewhat of a road map, maybe you, Romain, or
one
of the others can tell us when will MyFaces 2.2 be bundled with tomee(+)
?
I would love to start
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2013, 6:46
Subject: Re: 1.6.0 release plans?
When tomee will target javaee 7
Le 30 oct. 2013 05:26, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Mark
+ the whole apache EE 7
stack
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/10/30 Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com:
interesting response. well, tomcat 8
i am doing the same (see the URLs below).
/**
*
* http://tomee.apache.org/examples-trunk/access-timeout/README.html
* http://tomee.apache.org/examples-trunk/access-timeout-meta/
* http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19798-01/821-1841/gipsz/index.html
*/
@Singleton
@Lock(LockType.WRITE)
This morning, one of the endusers of my app contacted me and informed me
about an issue with the software i wrote to use @Singleton + @Lock(WRITE) +
@Schedule to retrieve emails from an email account where schedule = every 2
minutes.
This code has been running really well ever since I initially
.
to resolve this issue of mine. i'll give this a try. :)
[1] https://forums.oracle.com/message/10810414
[2]
http://www.ing.iac.es/~docs/external/java/javamail/javadocs/com/sun/mail/imap/package-summary.html
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote
+1 good news and thanks! I didn't even see this in NetBeans 7.4 startup
page. i guess my NetBeans did not receive that pushed message yet. :)
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.orgwrote:
there was a lot of buzz around the
Mark, since you mentioned somewhat of a road map, maybe you, Romain, or one
of the others can tell us when will MyFaces 2.2 be bundled with tomee(+) ?
I would love to start using MyFaces 2.2 with tomee, but i don't want to use
that until it is bundled in ZIP file. just a personal preference of
Interesting, you're using NetBeans and you have code that looks very
similar to mine, and it seems as though you did as I did... migrate from
glassfish 3.1.2(.2) to tomee(+).
at any rate, I think I remember seeing-and-experiencing that exception
before (some/long time ago[1]...in the past after
Since Apache ActiveMQ 5.9.0 has been released, will it be bundled with
TomEE+ 1.6.0 snapshot, sooner or later?
does it pass all (tomee-related) tests/TCKs, or there are known issues that
prevent it to be bundled with tomee+ (1.6.0 snapshot)?
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hehe, just announced so too early to say :p
Basically I have to check few more things that tck (we never passed jms
tcks). Size, deps, broker integration etc...
Amq is rarely a free upgrade
Le 22 oct. 2013 00:10, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit
wow, interesting response, (thanks) Mark! responses inline..
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Much easier solution:
mark the fields you don't like to persist as
@javax.persistence.Transient
interesting, did not know this.
In standard EJBs you will
so isEmpty() and size() is a hack and not recommended as touching in
standard EJBs?
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
IsEmpty or size hack is not portablr
Le 19 oct. 2013 15:04, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit :
I agree
responses inline below...
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
It depends on the application I'd say.
Of course if you use @Stateless then you are really bound to
entitymanager-per-transaction pattern, and then DTO is almost the only
thing which really
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
'did not touch'? i think you are referring to checking size() or isEmpty()
Yes, sometimes you even need to iterate through those lists and touch all
the lazy loading fields of those 1:n entities if you know you need them
.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, 19 October 2013, 16:29
Subject: Re: Entity cant be refreshed with new list values
so isEmpty() and size() is a hack and not recommended
responses below...
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
be careful with immediate=true. You get all sorts of nasty side effects.
see page 92 in
http://people.apache.org/~struberg/eesummit2013/Java%20EE%20Summit%20-%20pitfalls%20in%20EE.pdf
I definitely
seems like you posted twice. while waiting for one of the committers to
respond, you can search mail-list archives for the following:
site:openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com rest jaas tomee[1]
[1] http://lmgtfy.com/?q=site%3Aopenejb.979440.n4.nabble.com+rest+jaas+tomee
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 6:26
seems like you posted twice. while waiting for one of the committers to
respond, you can search mail-list archives for the following:
site:openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com rest jaas tomee[1]
[1] http://lmgtfy.com/?q=site%3Aopenejb.979440.n4.nabble.com+rest+jaas+tomee
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 6:40
wow, i think I'm experiencing some caching issue. I decided to download
2013-Oct-05 based on this thread/discussion/topic, I made some changes to
beans (java classes) and xhtml pages, and now it seems as though my xhtml
pages are trying to reference the old bean, when I modified xhtml pages to
please disregard. it was not a 'tomee' caching issue. it was a developer
issue (my fault). i only updated a few of the xhtml pages that I needed to
update instead of updating all xhtml pages...that needed to be udpated.
my app is working now. :)
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Howard W. Smith
i know i'm a late-comer, but I have been using NetBeans start/stop tomee+
ever since NetBeans 7.2 or 7.1.2, and using NetBeans 7.3, today, and
start/stop tomee+ works fine. when testing on my development server, i
always stop tomee+, drop WAR (manually) in tomee/webapps, and start. never
have any
i avoid restart and undeploy (in NetBeans); i forgot the reason why, but
many months ago, i just learned that the stuff/stack works great when i
stop - delete unpacked WAR folder - drop new WAR file in tomee/webapps -
start (via NetBeans on development server, and tomcat7w.exe on production
response inline/below...
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:50 AM, kuba44 jakub...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have any error with javax.mail.jar
okay. i assume that you are saying that you dropped the JAR in tomee/lib
folder.
Application works like earlier, but I have same problem. I think it's
responses inline (below)...
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:37 AM, kuba44 jakub...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe it isn't good place to ask this question but:
Which version of JavaMail API can I find in TomEE 1.5.2 server ?
Is it version 1.4 (geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.2) ?
yes, that is the
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:43 PM, kuba44 jakub...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, just delete geronimo-javamail JAR from your tomee/lib folder and
copy
javamail 1.5 to tomee/lib.
should it be only *javax.mail.jar* from
or something else ?? https://java.net/projects/javamail/pages/Home
yes,
+1 David. TomEE committers, users, community are the real heroes! :)
and one thing missing from the blog post... Google+, so I can +1 /and
share/ via Google+. :)
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Vishwanath Krishnamurthi
tovishwan...@gmail.com wrote:
Great times ahead for TomEE !
... and
Your question/post motivated me to take a look at (and download and test)
eclipselink 2.5.0 with my app that has been working well with eclipselink
2.3.2 (and apache derby)...for the last 2 years.
can you recommend any migration guide. I am reading the known issues list
and I see the requirement
Hmmm, Win XP == 32 bit, right? Is your Ubuntu desktop 32 or 64 bit?
I have been using TomEE+ ever since 1.5.1 snapshot, and first deployed to
Windows Server 2003 R2 (32 bit), and now I'm using TomEE+ 1.6.0 snapshot on
Windows Server 2008 (Windows 7 version) 64-bit.
since TomEE+ has been working
okay, Romain, this error showed up in the server log again, and I think I
have more details below.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
No idea, thats on a session timeout but if you dont go deeper we cant do
anything
Endusers of my app were
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
okay, Romain, this error showed up in the server log again, and I think I
have more details below.
also, i was using tomee 1.6.0 snapshot 2013-Aug-03, I think, but decided to
download tomee 1.6.0 snapshot
members are 'null', which is causing the
NullPointerExceptions...all over the place (where ever bean is accessed
after session destroy). :(
please confirm if this is possible or let me know if-or-how this is
possible.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com
this happens sporadically/intermittently, not all of the time, and not even
most-case scenario, but it did happen after the enduser logged in and
logged out via Internet Explorer (version 10) and Windows 8.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote
+1 Gurkan. which release or snapshot-release-and-date does this cookbook
target? Hopefully, it targets the latest version of tomee 1.6.0 (snapshot).
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.comwrote:
Hi folks
I have written a small cook book about Apache TomEE. My
CLARIFICATION:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
jsf.orders.pf_OrdersController.releaseResources(pf_OrdersController.java:631)
line 631 == if (browseCopy) { ... in the code segment below; browseCopy
(boolean) is never set to 'null' via my code/app.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Howard W
Also, I searched all log files, and this exception only occurred this
morning, first and only time/occurrence. :(
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
CLARIFICATION:
java.lang.NullPointerException
I am currently using TomEE 1.6.0 snapshot
(apache-tomee-1.6.0-20130803.041148-142-plus.zip) with OmniFaces 1.6
snapshot (2013-08-12). Per my experience, the INFO log lines below are
added to the log only if/when I am not using the omnifaces components in my
app. The INFO log lines are a bit
Lee, I will let someone else answer your questions, but your test case
reminded me of a BalusC (JSF guru) blog[1] that I visited many months ago.
It does not answer your question, but it is an alternate solution for what
you are already attempting to do...I think. :)
[1]
. :)
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
Lee, I will let someone else answer your questions, but your test case
reminded me of a BalusC (JSF guru) blog[1] that I visited many months ago.
It does not answer your question, but it is an alternate
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:33 AM, zmirc m_chi...@yahoo.com wrote:
It is probably a bug in MyFaces, because Glassfish 3.1.2.2 (with Majorra)
doesn't have this problem. (tested)
when i migrated from Mojarra 2.1.7 to MyFaces 2.1.8 (running on Glassfish
3.1.2.2), almost a year ago, I recognized
Your post on stackoverflow included the following:
CDI bean:
@Named(test)
@RequestScoped
public class TestB {
public void doSomething() {
System.out.println(I work.);
}
}
Maybe TomEE 1.5.2 'release' required the @RequestScoped bean to have a
and with that said, TomEE 1.6.0. snapshot = tomcat 7.0.42 (ever since the
day after tomcat 7.0.42 was released). :)
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
we had issues with defaults in 1.5.2, maybe give it a try with
1.6.0-SNAPSHOT. That said i
Mark Thomas just sent the following on tomcat user list:
Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC1 release vote started
So, my question is, when Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC1 is 'released', will TomEE
1.6.0 'snapshot' add Tomcat 8.0.0-RC1 as a dependency immediately following
the tomcat8 RC1 release?
Also, I ask,
and tomee 1.6 will still be javaee6 so it would cost
too much to support tomcat 7 and 8.
Tomee 2 will use it.
Le 1 août 2013 23:07, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Mark Thomas just sent the following on tomcat user list:
Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC1 release vote started
So
Interesting discussion. I may need to download latest TomEE 1.6.0 snapshot
and test to see if I see this behavior, as I am original poster and my code
is very similar to your code, zmirc.
I'm still using TomEE 1.6.0 snapshot 2013-07-19. have not had a need to
upgrade to latest snapshot.
On Mon,
Interesting.
On Jul 26, 2013 1:08 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
We discussed it on dev list and we ship the same db in openejb and tomee
and derby is slower than hsqldb which is nit acceptable for tests.
Le 26 juil. 2013 05:10, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032
is nit acceptable for tests.
Le 26 juil. 2013 05:10, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Interesting question. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that
Apache Derby (Java DB) is shipped with Glassfish. :)
Since I started as a Glassfish 3.1.x user, Apache Derby
Interesting question. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that
Apache Derby (Java DB) is shipped with Glassfish. :)
Since I started as a Glassfish 3.1.x user, Apache Derby was what I
initially used when I developed my database and JSF web app via Glassfish
and Derby, and still using Derby
You only mentioned TomEE 1.5.2 (release). Hopefully, the fix will work with
future releases of TomEE, too... especially TomEE 1.6.0 'snapshot', since
that is latest-n-greatest, right now. :)
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Chris Owens
ctag+open...@chris-owens.comwrote:
Done.
/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/**rmannibucau*https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/7/16 Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
I know that Romain is the man to respond to this topic, but I think I
have
seen others report similar issues, and I think Jose' has even reported
I know that Romain is the man to respond to this topic, but I think I have
seen others report similar issues, and I think Jose' has even reported a
similar issue, too, since I know he is using EAR + CODI + TOMEE 1.6.0
snapshot (OWB 1.2).
are you using EAR or dropping WAR in tomee/webapps ?
On
Tomee = tomcat on EE steroids. You cannot separate the two.
On Jul 10, 2013 8:27 AM, tschuler thomas.schu...@opentext.com wrote:
Hi Romain!
Thanks.
So there is no way to get the TomEE version itself?
If we want to ensure that, e.g. TomEE 1.6.0 is installed, we have to check
the OpenEJB
Leonardo, you may want to revisit Java EE 6 tutorial. almost 2 years ago
(summer 2011), before I began coding Java EE, I studied Java EE 6 tutorial,
and since I been doing (minimal) Java EE 6 ever since, by looking at your
code, I will respond as follows (based on my learning):
1. I would never
Jose,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, José Luis Cetina maxtorz...@gmail.comwrote:
configuration.ordinal=100
org.apache.webbeans.web.failover.issupportfailover=true
org.apache.webbeans.web.failover.issupportpassivation=true
I remember reading about this too in Thomas Andraschko's blog[1],
was shooting from the hip. :)
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Noone works on tomee ;)
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Leonardo K. Shikida shik...@gmail.comwrote:
And now I have 5 nice MDBs consuming simultaneously from the same JMS
and working as expected. :-)
glad to hear and i'm sure this is giving you more of a reason to love TOMEE
(as much as I do)! I had multiple MDBs too
Leo,
is this still an issue for you? in the other thread, i think you said
everything is working well now. right?
Howard
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Leonardo K. Shikida shik...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
I don't want that dead messages go to the queue://ActiveMQ.DLQ.
Instead, I'd like to
:-) but seems to work
I wish I could have it automatically. It´s not how it´s supposed to be
TIA
Leo
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
Leo,
is this still an issue for you? in the other thread, i think you said
everything is working well now
, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am not and have never been a 1.5.2-release 'user'. I am a 1.6.0
'snapshot' user. And I did use 1.5.1 snapshot and 1.5.2 snapshot.
did you try 1.6.0 snapshot and my recommendations?
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:03 AM
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:57 AM, CThorburn cthorbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Dmitry, did you find a solution to this? I'm getting it too
Are you using TomEE 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.5.3 snapshot, or recent-or-latest
version of TomEE 1.6.0 snapshot?
do you get this exception with latest tomee 1.6.0 snapshot?
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:00 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.comwrote:
a relatively ancient 1.6 snapshot build
laughing/smiling here... didn't know the phrase, 'a relatively ancient',
could be used to describe a '1.6 snapshot build'. :)
of course, that reminds me of quite a few topics
Definitely obvious (tomee = tomcat) . ;-)
FWIW, I've been using Atmosphere ever since tomee 1.5.1 SNAPSHOT (Tomcat
7.0.34), used it with tomee 1.5.2 SNAPSHOT and still using it with tomee
1.6.0 snapshot (Tomcat 7.0.35+). No problems.
No need for jee7 at all in my opinion. Jee6 still going
/*
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/7/1 Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
my response below...
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:45 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com
wrote
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8:25 AM, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1 July 2013 12:44, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there an assumption or history that has informed you that database was
not available at boot/startup of the 'app'?
It happened
Class java.util.ServiceLoader$LazyIterator can not access a member of class
org.omnifaces.cdi.converter.ConverterExtension with modifiers [1]
is the exception that I get on startup of TomEE 1.6.0 snapshot
(2013-06-17). This exception occurs, because the following was implemented
and added to
Please disregard. OmniFaces committer fixed the issue and responded with
the following:
[1] https://code.google.com/p/omnifaces/issues/detail?id=198#c4
[2] https://code.google.com/p/omnifaces/issues/detail?id=198#c5
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
Wow, interesting topic, especially since the expert/committer guys are
chiming in on the topic! My responses are inline below...
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi Michiel!
Slightly OT:
the EJB timers are _really_ useful, but I found @Asynchronous to
response below...
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Fernando Lozano ferna...@lozano.eti.brwrote:
Hi,
JMS 2.0 spec = Java EE 7, right?
So, IMO, if you're interested in usability of JMS 2.0, I would recommend
you use Reference Implementation (RI, Glassfish 4.0) for now, and
'evaluate' java
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Here is the exception:
org.apache.webbeans.exception.WebBeansConfigurationException: If bean has
a public field, bean scope must be defined as @Scope. Bean is :
com.maxtorzito.test.MyBeanThree
at
Hmmm, OP says, ... (keep reading below)
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:02 PM, José Luis Cetina maxtorz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just FYI, when you declare ( i did that by mistake) public attributes with
their getter and setters in your ManagedBean you get this exception (by the
way the error is not
put some part of your app in tomee/lib?
Le 11 juin 2013 02:58, José Luis Cetina maxtorz...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Yes. Maven download always the lastest snapshot.
El 10/06/2013 19:54, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com
escribió:
Latest TomEE 1.6.0-snapshot
maxtorz...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes. Maven download always the lastest snapshot.
El 10/06/2013 19:54, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
escribió:
Latest TomEE 1.6.0-snapshot (trunk) ?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:50 PM, José Luis Cetina maxtorz...@gmail.com
wrote:
CODI 1.5
Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
Jose, when was the last time you did a 'maven download' of TomEE 1.6.0
snapshot and did 'not' see this issue/behavior?
Did something else change? maybe new bean, properties, etc...? you have
any
code you can share, maybe a stub or something
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:17 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.comwrote:
Don't forget, most of these specs expect javabeans - POJOs w/ private
fields getters/setters/issers.
I wanted John's earlier point mentioned again. this is how i learned
itas I learned Java EE via Java EE 6
John,
Wow, this is a coincidence and interesting. We have been discussing
TomEE/CDI topics, and now you bring this up. Please click the following URL
and read that. :)
http://code.google.com/p/omnifaces/issues/detail?id=183
Howard
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:23 PM, John D. Ament
Jose,
Interesting. I think i have plenty of (CDI) managed beans with public
attributes, which are referenced by xhtml files and .java classes in my web
app (WAR), but I don't have CODI dependency.
What versions of CODI and TomEE are you using?
Howard
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:02 PM, José Luis
Latest TomEE 1.6.0-snapshot (trunk) ?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:50 PM, José Luis Cetina maxtorz...@gmail.comwrote:
CODI 1.5 and TomEE 1.6.0-Snapshot.
:)
El 10/06/2013 16:28, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
escribió:
Interesting.
Caused
+1 good job, and your blog/steps make it look really really simple (and I
cannot imagine 'frustration' at all after briefly reviewing your blog).
FYI, i'm not an IntelliJ IDEA user. I'm 'happily' a NetBeans 7.x user. :)
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Jason Zwolak jzwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Interesting. I thought it was said that tomee 1.6.0 will go with
OpenWebBeans 1.2.0. Is the goal to go with 1.2.1 which will bring some new
enhancements?
On Jun 5, 2013 6:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
We are pretty stable ATM but waiting for openjpa and
Haha agreed, I think you're right. :-)
On Jun 5, 2013 7:20 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
We need 1.2.1 because pf some users but not sure you'll see any difference
in your own app ;)
Le 6 juin 2013 01:13, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit
responses inline below...
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Andrew Clarke s...@clarke.ca wrote:
persistence.xml:
persistence xmlns=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence; xmlns:xsi=
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; xsi:schemaLocation=
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence
responses inline below...
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Andrew Clarke s...@clarke.ca wrote:
persistence.xml:
persistence xmlns=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence; xmlns:xsi=
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; xsi:schemaLocation=
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence
Wow, nice response David. A nice list that show impact and new/target
versions and even mention of the time line.
On Jun 3, 2013 12:36 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 1, 2013, at 3:04 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
I think realistically you need all
of the components to bump up to their
Java EE 7 compliant versions.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Tomee is tomcat so we need at least a tomcat 8 release
Le 1 juin 2013 05:13, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
a
écrit
Of course, I saw the following blog post:
Introducing Java EE 7: June 12 Kickoff[1]
I think I heard some chatter about Java EE 7 on this list sometime
recently, but I don't remember what was said. So, what are TomEE's plans
for adapting Java EE 7 ? Is Java EE 7 on the schedule after TomEE 1.6.0
When I started using TomEE+ (1.5.1 snapshot, 1.5.2 snapshot and 1.6.0
snapshot), I started using asm-3.3.1.jar because it was dependency of some
batoo JPA.
I'm no longer using batoo JPA, but I kept asm-3.3.1.jar and using eclipse
2.3.2 JAR, and I have had no issues.
I just downloaded latest
Really?
Have a look[1] :p
[1] http://imageshack.us/a/img543/2448/20130521asminthesnapsho.jpg
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Asm is not in the snapshot :p
Le 21 mai 2013 23:46, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit :
When I
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
true... 'others' (myself) just tested latest snapshot and tomee started
and my web app running/working 'as expected'. :)
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote
ohhh trunk is on 22nd but snapshot JARs in repository are still on 20
(currently, at the same time that i'm sending this email). :)
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes but we are on the 22sd ;)
Le 22 mai 2013 00:11, Howard W. Smith, Jr
, the main issue was to reproduce it locally for us i think
Le 22 mai 2013 00:27, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit :
My apologies. I said that I will stop the noise and proceed by cleaning
up
the NPE's in my app. Well, evidently, I didn't; I have been working on
other
i take that back... i stand corrected, yes, we're on 22nd, now. :)
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
ohhh trunk is on 22nd but snapshot JARs in repository are still on 20
(currently, at the same time that i'm sending this email
Okay, I've seen the recent OWB (or CDI) topics, so I thought I might
introduce a separate thread based on my experience today.
Months ago, I migrated from JSF managed beans to CDI manageds (and migrated
from Glassfish to TomEE/OpenWebBeans), two birds with one stone. During
that migration, I
you recommended to use @Typed?
@Typed (in that thread) was being used to *remove* objects from being
installed via CDI.
If you want to use @Typed you need to use it as @Typed(pf_
OrderCustomerPointOfContactController.class)
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032
201 - 300 of 433 matches
Mail list logo
