Whoops, sorry, I thought I thought I read AJP, not APR, my mistake, those
options SHOULD work.
--
Sent from: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-Users-f979441.html
We are seeing performance issues in TomEE during the peak load. Our
production has 95 PODs with 4 CPU/8GB ram. We have not seen any issues with
the memory, memory pools , CPU utilization etc..and everything is with in
Threshold. One observation from AppDynamics is that the no. of busy threads
in
Thx Jonathan, but we are using haveged since 2 months into development :)
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan S. Fisher
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2018 6:16 PM
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Subject: *EXT* [Newsletter] Re: [Newsletter] Re: [Newsletter] Re: TomEE
Performance
Hey one more
t; performance issues, I will get back in contact.
> >
> > Thanks all for the replies!
> >
> > Best
> > Fabian
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 2:08 PM
> > To: users@
esday, September 04, 2018 2:08 PM
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Subject: *EXT* [Newsletter] Re: [Newsletter] Re: TomEE Performance
>
> Hi Fabian,
>
> a few pointers and directions to check:
>
> 1. Ensure to test with securerandom.source=/dev/./urandom since you use a
&g
for the replies!
Best
Fabian
-Original Message-
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 2:08 PM
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Subject: *EXT* [Newsletter] Re: [Newsletter] Re: TomEE Performance
Hi Fabian,
a few pointers and directions to check:
1. Ensure to test
te/83781f05950f245a3bfd2388c5bfd7ab
>
> Also at the bottom there is a vmstat result, its definitely multithreaded
> :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Louis Monteiro
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 11:59 AM
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Subject: *EXT*
gt;
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Louis Monteiro
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 11:41 AM
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Subject: *EXT* [Newsletter] Re: [Newsletter] Re: [Newsletter] Re: TomEE
> Performance
>
> Ah ok. Well I was asking if you were injecting when
e tried Singleton before, but not sure
> what the reason was why we went with @Stateless...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Louis Monteiro
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 11:30 AM
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Subject: *EXT* [Newsletter] Re: [Newsletter] Re: TomE
: [Newsletter] Re: [Newsletter] Re: TomEE
Performance
Ah ok. Well I was asking if you were injecting when you took the thread dump
because from a server point of view I saw only one thread working.
If you were using jmeter with multiple virtual users, I was expecting to see
more than one thread
ers@tomee.apache.org
> Subject: *EXT* [Newsletter] Re: [Newsletter] Re: TomEE Performance
>
> Yes exactly.
>
> Were you injecting anything when you took the jstack?
> It seems that only one thread is working.
>
> We would need you to do it when you are injecting.
> I
...
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 11:30 AM
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Subject: *EXT* [Newsletter] Re: [Newsletter] Re: TomEE Performance
Yes exactly.
Were you injecting anything when you took the jstack?
It seems that only one thread is working.
We
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
> Like this:
> https://gist.github.com/TrustedGate/f670c079088404f42d69aabd409de7c4 ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Louis Monteiro
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 8:38 AM
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Subject: *EXT
Like this:
https://gist.github.com/TrustedGate/f670c079088404f42d69aabd409de7c4 ?
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 8:38 AM
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Subject: *EXT* [Newsletter] Re: TomEE Performance
Hi,
Around SOAP, there are a couple
Hi,
Around SOAP, there are a couple of possible optimizations.
What would be helpful is to get into the docker container when you are over
the linear zone and get a jstack of the tomee process.
Post it here or in gist and put the link here.
Jean-Louis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Hey,
we have been running some performance tests with our application (TomEE 7.0.5
based) and are stuck:
Until 4 core VMs (or docker containers) we see a linear increase in
performance, which is great and was anticipated.
But after 4 cores, we barely get 10% (with 8 cores) more
I this one of those your app is bigger than my app deals? :)
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
> To give you a bit of perspective.
> I did have a public internet application written in JSF which _easily_
> took 5 Mio page hits / day from about
Thanks!! We are going to perform a load performance test
-Mensaje original-
De: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID]
Enviado el: martes, 24 de enero de 2017 16:14
Para: users@tomee.apache.org
Asunto: Re: TomEE performance
To give you a bit of perspective.
I did have a public
To give you a bit of perspective.
I did have a public internet application written in JSF which _easily_ took 5
Mio page hits / day from about 70.000 unique users.
Or another application which makes up to 20k requests per minute for about 7k
users.
Quick enough? ;)
LieGrue,
strub
> Am
Romain is correct since there are many vectors involved. I have a simple
geofencing service that scales out to over 1m requests a day and it runs on
a server with other apps. I have another app that is more sophisticated,
but leverages JCache and is on the same server. Only two VMs (2 vCPUs, 8G
Hi Romain,
We will do the benchmark as you recommend.
Thanks for your fast response!!
David
-Mensaje original-
De: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 23 de enero de 2017 12:50
Para: users@tomee.apache.org
Asunto: Re: TomEE performance
Hi
2017-01-23
Hi all,
We would like to know, before launch the load performance test. We are still in
solution analysis time:
Which is the maximum number of concurrent users or clients supported by TomEE
server?
Context:
Application Web functionalities: login against LDAP plus 2 screens for showing
few
Great, thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-performance-degrades-gradually-tp4668090p4668693.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi All
I was able to reproduce TomEE performance degradation issue using EJB 2.1
CMP EntityBeans (CMP2) example from TOMEE site
http://tomee.apache.org/examples-trunk/simple-cmp2/README.html
i ve added a couple lines to test() method of the example to print out the
execution time of findAll
in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-performance-degrades-gradually-tp4668090p4668673.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
3, so it looks like the
problem is isolated to the use of ejb2 cmp entity beans.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-performance-degrades-gradually-tp4668090p4668673.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
not seeing the same issue using ejb 3, so it looks like the
problem is isolated to the use of ejb2 cmp entity beans.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-performance-degrades-gradually-tp4668090p4668673.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive
this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-performance-degrades-gradually-tp4668090p4668673.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
initial performance but after 500 and more
requests it becomes twice worse.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-performance-degrades-gradually-tp4668090p4668650.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
David Blevins david.blevins at gmail.com writes:
I have noticed the same issue on my project. The EJB 2.x.
Exactly the same behavior as described on the top
First response is very quickly and then it becomes worse and aprox after 500
requests it performance becomes slower twice
First
Any cache to optimize?
Prepared stmt activated on the pool?
Anyway, thanks for the relevant feedback and for helping in the diagnose
process.
JLouis
2014-04-04 11:46 GMT+02:00 ivan nikitsenka nikitse...@gmail.com:
David Blevins david.blevins at gmail.com writes:
I have noticed the same
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:46 AM, ivan nikitsenka nikitse...@gmail.comwrote:
query
description/description
query-method
method-namefindAll/method-name
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
wrote:
yes, I have some quite complex SQL, and when I profile the app (via
jvisualvm), I find that Apache Derby source code is not performing well
with [my] SQL and/or [my] database design, etc...
Correction,
I tend to disagree with that.
Each part of a system has it's own goal and scope.
Database is for data so I tend to use it as much as possible for sorting,
joining, etc, instead of relaying on Java for sorting collections or even
JPA to get a parent, then all childs, then all childs but applying a
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.comwrote:
I tend to disagree with that.
Each part of a system has it's own goal and scope.
Database is for data so I tend to use it as much as possible for sorting,
joining, etc, instead of relaying on Java for sorting
into Weblogic/websphere it's
performances is 5 times more. So I strongly feel that there could be
something wrong in TomEE configuration which reduces performances gradually.
Your help is highly appreciable.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE
gradually.
Your help is highly appreciable.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-performance-degrades-gradually-tp4668090p4668108.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
37 matches
Mail list logo