HI everyone,
thanks very much for your help.
So much to learn at the moment so I really appreciate you all helping me out
- it takes a while to get to know what you can and can't do with wicket.
AjaxRequestTarget.get() worked just fine.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Peter Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECT
I can't say anything about having done it, I certainly haven't even if I'm
using the prototip-minis, but I can comment on upgrading to prototip 2.
I asked the same question a month ago, and the thing is that Richard has
permission to use prototip 1.2 for free whereas prototip 2.x has a license f
Thanks for notifying... I see if theres another provider then, one which
are using apache or bsd license..
Alexander Landsnes Keül wrote:
I can't say anything about having done it, I certainly haven't even if I'm
using the prototip-minis, but I can comment on upgrading to prototip 2.
I asked
Hi,
I am using Google collections with Wicket 1.3.4 and hit with this
serialization error.
ERROR - Objects- Error serializing object class
web.AdminPage [object=[Page class = web.AdminPage, id = 5, version = 0]]
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$WicketNotSerializa
What about this one
http://15daysofjquery.com/examples/jqueryTooltips/demo2.php ?
Alexander Landsnes Keül wrote:
I can't say anything about having done it, I certainly haven't even if I'm
using the prototip-minis, but I can comment on upgrading to prototip 2.
I asked the same question a month
This is the anonymous inner class inside the LinkedListMultimap class
which is not Serializable (LinkedListMultimap*$1*)
Best regards
Pierre
TH Lim a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I am using Google collections with Wicket 1.3.4 and hit with this
> serialization error.
>
> ERROR - Objects
I am aware of the "$1". I did the instanceof check in my code. I printed the
class name which is, of course, "LinkedListMultimap$1" and it is indeed an
instanceof Serializable. So basically, LinkedListMultimap$1 implements
Serializable but it failed the checking at
org.apache.wicket.util.io.Serial
The Serlializable-check isn't sufficient. you can mark any class serializable
if you want. what really counts is that all fields of the class are
serializable, you should have a look at them ...
TH Lim wrote:
>
> I am aware of the "$1". I did the instanceof check in my code. I printed
> the cl
I tried another method. Instead of passing the reference to my IDataProvider
implementation, MyDataProvider, I recode MyDataProvider to get it from the
MySession which extends Wicket Session. I don't any difference here but it
works. I still not sure what caused MyDataProvider to fail to persist
b
After more investigation, the problems were coming from trying to run the
upload in a separate thread.
Once I move the code back into the main thread where the onSubmit is pressed
it all works fine.
Is it possible to have the upload process take place in a separate thread,
so the user can continu
Alright, if I pass LinkedListMultiMap instance into my IDataProvider
implementation, MyDataProvider, Wicket is able to persist. Whereas, if I
pass the List instance from LinkedListMultiMap.get(...), Wicket will throw
the unserializable exception. I presume something in LinkedListMultimap$1
made it
Node is not $1, that is LLMM$Node
$1 is declared inside LLMM#get(K key):
public List get(final @Nullable K key) {
return new AbstractSequentialList() {
public int size() {
return keyCount.count(key);
}
public ListIterator listIterator(int index) {
you save the provider to the session? that's kind of an anti-pattern as it
gets serialized there anyway (at least in a clustered environment). you
should rather boil down to the field that causes the not-serializable
exception, wicket tells you exactly which field it is anyway. or provide us
some
I'm doing a file uploading screen, where some of the files can be quite large
(up to 30mb) and am therefore hoping to be able to process the actual upload
in a separate thread to the screen.
All my post processing on the file that takes place works fine in a separate
thread, but if I try to do th
Hi All,
I have a couple of DateTimeField components on a form on a page that has a
Link that opens another page. In the onClick() method for the Link I need
to get the values for the dates to put into a PageParameters object.
However I can't seem to get the modified values for the dates. I've
I override BaseTree's newLink() to return an IndicatingAjaxLink:
@Override
public MarkupContainer newLink(String id, final ILinkCallback
callback)
{
return new IndicatingAjaxLink(id)
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
pu
if my requestTarget is of type IListenerInterfaceRequestTarget,
WebRequestCodingStrategy it calls the method
protected CharSequence encode(RequestCyclerequestCycle,
IListenerInterfaceRequestTargetrequestTarget) ,
this method puts lot of details in url l?wicket:interface=:60
and does
I need a certain div to appear when the user mouse-overs an image.
For this, i added a behaviour to the image:
add(imageDiv.add(new AjaxEventBehavior("onmouseover")
{
@Override
protected void onEvent(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
div.setVisible(true);
image
I was passing the dates (and some other fields) in parameters so they could
be restored when returning back to the page. I just came across a different
technique for doing this in Wicket In Action (listing 6.7) so it is no
longer an issue for me. Thanks WIA! Great book - has helped me numerous
mount the page in your application class with a different encodingstrategy.
e.g. indexedparamurlencodingstrategy which produces neat urls
miro wrote:
>
> if my requestTarget is of type IListenerInterfaceRequestTarget,
> WebRequestCodingStrategy it calls the methodprotected CharSeque
No, I didn't save the provider in the session. Just the LinkedListMultimap
instance. As Martijn has pointed it out with the code snippet why $1 is not
serializable, the only way is to keep the LinkedListMultimap and not the
List.
Wicket is pretty good. It points to the exact field where the prob
but if you save the linkedlistmultimap (which isn't serializable, right?) in
the session you'll run into problems as well ... at the latest in a
clustered environment
TH Lim wrote:
>
> No, I didn't save the provider in the session. Just the LinkedListMultimap
> instance. As Martijn has po
No, linkedlistmultimap is serializable. only $1 is not. If you look at the
snippet the $1 class is created on the fly when linkedlistmultimap.get(...)
is invoked.
Michael Sparer wrote:
>
> but if you save the linkedlistmultimap (which isn't serializable, right?)
> in the session you'll run int
I'm printing text to an image before adding it to the page. Right now the
process goes like this:
final BufferedDynamicImageResource resource = new
BufferedDynamicImageResource();
java.awt.image.BufferedImage image;
image = ImageIO.read(new File("C:\\path\\to\\image.png"))
Have you tried this:
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/image/resource/RenderedDynamicImageResource.html
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:32 AM, insom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm printing text to an image before adding it to the page. Right n
So you're putting an object into your session just because on of its public
methods returns a not-serializable object?
TH Lim wrote:
>
> No, linkedlistmultimap is serializable. only $1 is not. If you look at
> the snippet the $1 class is created on the fly when
> linkedlistmultimap.get(...) is
No that not the reason. The reason I need to keep the items each user has
entered. I can be a List or Map but for this case linkedlistmultimap works
best for me. Do you have a better alternative? I would like to how know to
improve this.
Michael Sparer wrote:
>
> So you're putting an object int
jwcarman wrote:
>
> Have you tried this:
>
> http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/image/resource/RenderedDynamicImageResource.html
>
I hadn't tried it. Looking at it now, it appears to do the opposite of what
I want. Its render(Graphics2D) fu
I'd recommend to either use one of the standard collections in the session or
a LoadableDetachableModel and save the items in a DB, but that depends on
your usecase. i personally do the model approach as it keeps my session slim
and avoids hibernate's lazyinitexceptions when dealing with the model
do you mean that I should mount a class several times for all different
implementations of IRequestTaget ?
like
Michael Sparer wrote:
>
> mount the page in your application class with a different
> encodingstrategy. e.g. indexedparamurlencodingstrategy which produces neat
> urls
>
>
> miro
I found my problem in the end. There was an object that wasn't able to be
correctly serialized (a JFreeChart object), which threw an error that, due
to some mistake on my logging configuration I was hiding.
Anyway, once I fixed the serialization problem, now everything is being
correctly versioned
No you only mount your page once, and after e.g. a formsubmit you could
perform a redirect to the page if you want to keep your nice url - but i
think we had that topic before, hadn't we?
miro wrote:
>
> do you mean that I should mount a class several times for all different
> implementation
You can use Graphics2D's drawImage() method can't you?
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:53 AM, insom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> jwcarman wrote:
>>
>> Have you tried this:
>>
>> http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/image/resource/RenderedDynamicIma
Hello,
In my firm, we're currently using a homegrown component-like framework,
based on cgi-perl scripts calling servlets. I would like to prove my
boss how smooth the transition towards Wicket could be.
I'm trying to make a first step, replacing the perl scripts with Wicket,
and calling the c
I apologize if this question has been addressed before however I didn't find
any thing doing a quick search. What is the recommended practice for
handling HTML fragments from an AJAX response? For example, if I were doing
something similar to jquery's load() or prototype's Updater() functions.
Si
You implement the onClick() method of a link such as the AjaxFallbackLink
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/ajax/markup/html/AjaxFallbackLink.html
If the AjaxRequestTarget is null then the browser does not have
JavaScript enabled.
@Override
public void o
Thanks Scott. I think I get it now.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You implement the onClick() method of a link such as the AjaxFallbackLink
>
>
> http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/ajax/markup/html/AjaxFallbackL
Is there a global configration for redirect , ie if I want all my form
submission to do a redirect ?
Michael Sparer wrote:
>
> No you only mount your page once, and after e.g. a formsubmit you could
> perform a redirect to the page if you want to keep your nice url - but i
> think we had tha
In an Ajax call you get a handle to the so-called ajax target.
The ajax target is used to ajax-update components ('to be updated via
an AJAX call').
So, roughly a non-ajax link is as follows:
page.add(new Link(xx));
An ajax link is as follows:
page.add(new AjaxLink(xx) {
@Override
onSubmit
Subclass form, override onSubmit, make it final, perform the redirect in
there, offer another method to be overriden instead of onsubmit and use that
form throughout your app
miro wrote:
>
> Is there a global configration for redirect , ie if I want all my form
> submission to do a redirect
Found it... I was using in the html instead of for
the WebMarkupContainer.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior-works-one-time-tp19002634p19035645.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
All the "Crawlable"/"indexable"/Search Engine friendly pages cannot be
session relative. Inherently those are more secure pages, probably better
used for secure portion of your application vs. freely crawlable. Besides
Search engines dont seem to like session ids. One can still achieve the
effect
Hi folks,
I find myself occasionally using nested forms in my Wicket apps. With
nested forms, when the outer form is submitted, it triggers a
validation and submission of any inner forms as well. In some
cases I don't want this behaviour, but instead I want the inner form and
outer form to be inde
Almost 4 years of using Wicket, being productive, having fun and
learning every day - and just now I ordered my copy of Wicket in Action*.
Many thanks to all core developers
Sven
*the 'living-tree' edition ;)
Martijn Dashorst schrieb:
Almost 3 years of hard work, loosing friends, moving abro
Can't you just override isEnabled() on the inner form and return
true/false depending on whether the inner form should be processed?
-Matej
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:42 PM, John Krasnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I find myself occasionally using nested forms in my Wicket apps. Wi
Chapter 5 of Wicket in Action covers this topic, to be more specific:
"Section 5.4.2 Using AjaxFallbackLink to respond to client actions",
and modifies the Cheesr store to use Ajax links to add items to the
shopping cart instead of using normal links.
Martijn
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Greg
I never did receive my email telling me the final copy was available
for download. Should I email the publisher and ask for a new download
link?
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Sven Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Almost 4 years of using Wicket, being productive, having fun and learning
> eve
Hi!
Which is generally the preferred / least expensive way to get a resource
string?
new ResourceModel("my.resource.key").getObject().toString();
or
getLocalizer().getString("my.resource.key", MyComponent.this);
I've been using getLocalizer almost everywhere, and only using ResourceModel
when I
Does it make sense to have outputMarkupId default to true for FeedbackPanel?
Use case:
somePanel.add (new OnChangeAjaxBehavior() {
protected void onUpdate (AjaxRequestTarget target) {
// do stuff,
Session.get().info ("did stuff");
target.addChildren (getPage(), FeedbackPanel.class
Landry,
1 - setEscapeModelStrings(false)
2 - Subclass Include. Override onComponentTagBody and use importAsString()
Regards - Cemal
http://www.jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk
landry soules wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In my firm, we're currently using a homegrown component-like framework,
>
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
> I suppose that Wicket postpones the second request and when it is
> exectured
> later on, the behaviour has already been removed.
This sounds likely, as the requests are processed
serially.
> What is the best way to have a JS behaviour executed only
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, lesterburlap wrote:
> new ResourceModel("my.resource.key").getObject().toString();
> or
> getLocalizer().getString("my.resource.key", MyComponent.this);
Isn't the latter same as
Component.getString("my.resource.key");
?
And ResourceModel can typically be used directly as
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Patrick Angeles wrote:
> Does it make sense to have outputMarkupId default to true for FeedbackPanel?
>
> Use case:
>
> somePanel.add (new OnChangeAjaxBehavior() {
> protected void onUpdate (AjaxRequestTarget target) {
> // do stuff,
> Session.get().info ("did stuf
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:05 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never did receive my email telling me the final copy was available
> for download. Should I email the publisher and ask for a new download
> link?
If you bought at the manning site, then yes. If you shopped at Amazon,
t
Hhhehe, know the situation my wifes pregnant with our second child, and
we(I) need to do some fixing too and split a room into two pieces before
it's born, so I sacrificed my Suzuki sv 650 (which I never used anyway
btw)..
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Johan Compagne
I still for one try to get ajax away for public(unauthorized) parts,
for seo and caching purposes but it depends on the situation..
Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Patrick Angeles wrote:
Does it make sense to have outputMarkupId default to true for FeedbackPanel?
Use case:
so
56 matches
Mail list logo
