Loading image or component

Hi, I am doing som queries on database through ajaxFallBackLink and it can take some time. Due this time I need some component or some loading image to show that site is alive and it is working? Thank you in advance - To unsu

Re: Loading image or component

Thank you for your mail. I am presently on vacation and will return April 14th. If you need urgent assistance, please email supp...@bookingbooster.com. You can also reach our Support via Skype callto://premiersupport Thank you Best regards, Nick Wheeler Booking Booster.com t: +44 (0)1273

Re: Loading image or component

http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/generic-busy-indicator-for-both-ajax-and-non-ajax-submits.html 2009/4/11 Vladimir Zavada : > Hi, > I am doing som queries on database through ajaxFallBackLink and it can take > some time. Due this time I need some component or some loading image to show > that site i

Re: Package all CSS and JS

In case of wro4j, css can be merged no matter where they are located: "Css url rewriting - after css resources are merged, the relative url will not point any more to a valid location. That is why it is important to overwrite the url's in the css files after merging. This is the most powerful fe

HTTP pseudo streaming for Wicket

I need to stream H264 .mp4 movies to a Flash video player (JW Player) and want to support HTTP pseudo streaming, i.e., the user should be able to seek within the movie. Does anybody know of a Wicket implementation for this, something like xmoov-php [1] for Java with a corresponding Wicket c

Session Invalidation

Hi, I have a custom session for my wicket application 1 and the custom session has some attributes. from wicket application 1, i navigate to wicket application 2. And in wicket application 2, i have a custom request cycle in which retrieve the custom session of wicket application 1 is retrieved and

Re: Loading image or component

Thank you very much, I really appreciate your help. 2009/4/11 Martin Makundi > > http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/generic-busy-indicator-for-both-ajax-and-non-ajax-submits.html > > 2009/4/11 Vladimir Zavada : > > Hi, > > I am doing som queries on database through ajaxFallBackLink and it can > take

serialVersionUID

A quick question - is it generally acceptable to use private static final long serialVersionUID = *1L*; for most the anonymous inner class I create using Wicket? Specifically, I'm asking about using the value (-1). I've seen this idiom in the source but wasn't sure if there was some rati

Google App Engine and Wicket

I've been experimenting a bit with Google App Engine and Wicket and things seemed to work fairly well once I turned off the ModificationWatcher. However, I realized that my simple tests were all stateless and that once stateful, Wicket would use the DiskPageStore to write some files, which is not a

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

Here are a couple of pointers regarding Wicket on GAE: http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/ On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Welch wrote: > I've been experimenting a bit with Google App Engine and Wicket and things > seemed to work fairly wel

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

Here's another article about Wicket and GAE on DZone: http://www.dzone.com/links/rss/wicket_on_google_app_engine.html On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Sergey Podatelev < brightnesslev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here are a couple of pointers regarding Wicket on GAE: > > > http://www.danwalmsley.com/2

iLearn Wicket - Please reply with your feedback

Dear All, I have been comparing between many component based frameworks around that follows the MVC architecture, as i ended up comparing between JSF and Wicket, however i have seen more advantages in Wicket rather than JSF, however one of the cons on wicket size was its educational resource

Re: HTTP pseudo streaming for Wicket

I've been doing some work on the RTMP protocol recently and have this open-source project up: http://flazr.com/ Right now it is a client-side piece, but should be easy to add server-side as well in case that is what you want. It is definitely much lighter than Red5. If you see potential or have

Re: serialVersionUID

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 08:45:31AM -0500, Luther Baker wrote: > A quick question - is it generally acceptable to use > > private static final long serialVersionUID = *1L*; > > for most the anonymous inner class I create using Wicket? Specifically, I'm > asking about using the value (-1).

Re: serialVersionUID

Thanks John, Let me take this one step farther, just to clarify. I know that in a standard web application, the web container can Serialize user HttpSessions such that one can shut an application down and upon bringing it back up, HttpSession state is restored and, for instance, a user might not

JOptionpane dialog windows

I have a question about using JOptionPane dialogs in my wicket application. Is it safe to use them? Is it better to use javascript alert or JOptionPane dialog? thx for your opinion - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@w

Re: serialVersionUID

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:31:47PM -0500, Luther Baker wrote: > Thanks John, > > Let me take this one step farther, just to clarify. > > I know that in a standard web application, the web container can Serialize > user HttpSessions such that one can shut an application down and upon > bringing it

Re: Extend layout of a page

ptrash wrote: > > Hi, > > can you explain a liitle bit what exactly you mean? > > > > nino martinez wael wrote: >> >> you could do something like composition by doing inheritance and >> repeaters... >> > > For your composite pages to know where to put their components in the flow of th

Re: serialVersionUID

> > You don't need a serialVersionUID for serialization to work (and > certainly not a unique one, or your plan for using 1L wouldn't very > well). > Thanks. -Luther

Re: serialVersionUID

The purpose of the *public* static final long serialVersionUID is for long term storage or situations where you may potentially have made modifications to the class that make it incompatible with previous versions (distributed apps/clustering). I'd say that its easier to just add it in case you eve

Request input stream

Hello, Is there a way on a org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebPage to access the HttpServletRequest? Is it mapped somehow? Or to have access to the input stream of the request the way getResponse() offers to the output stream? Thank you, Cristi Manole

Re: Request input stream

Thank you for your mail. I am presently on vacation and will return April 14th. If you need urgent assistance, please email supp...@bookingbooster.com. You can also reach our Support via Skype callto://premiersupport Thank you Best regards, Nick Wheeler Booking Booster.com t: +44 (0)1273

Re: Request input stream

((webresponse)getrequestcycle().getrequest()).gethttpservletrequest() -igor On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Cristi Manole wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a way on a org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebPage to access the > HttpServletRequest? Is it mapped somehow? > > Or to have access to the input st

Re: Request input stream

actually ((*WebRequest*)getRequestCycle().getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() Thanks a lot for the [very] quick answer!! Cristi On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > ((webresponse)getrequestcycle().getrequest()).gethttpservletrequest() > > -igor > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at

Re: serialVersionUID

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 05:32:51PM -0400, Ben Tilford wrote: > The purpose of the *public* static final long serialVersionUID is for long > term storage or situations where you may potentially have made modifications > to the class that make it incompatible with previous versions (distributed > app

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

Both articles avoid the DiskPageStore problem by using the HttpSessionStore, however if you do a search through the mailing list archives for HttpSessionStore you'll find numerous references to problems in using it in the long term and especially in a real, production application, so I don't think

Re: serialVersionUID

I'm suprised no one has mentioned the runtime cost of computing a default serialversionid which is avoided if a constant is supplied. I used to make it a habit for this reason. This thread made me curious if that was really true, so I googled a bit and found this article

Re: serialVersionUID

This has been a good thread. I seem to remember the warning became much more over-stated when Ganymede (Eclipse 3.4) was released. An avid of user of FindBugs, I like avoiding squiggly yellow lines so I did the same here - and "generating" a unique id sounds so much more llike the "right" thing to

Re: Package all CSS and JS

Yes, I see your point... by including jquery with two different sets, you actually make it worse because it can't be cached anymore. You're only going to gain a minor advantage if you bundle the whole possible set (for the whole site) in one download, but I doubt it would be worth the trouble

Re: serialVersionUID

Yes, its fine. you really only need to worry about that kind of thing when you are passing java serialized classes between VMs (as in RMI). In fact, you likely don't really even need to bother for Wicket, and you can turn off that check in Eclipse. - Brill Pappin On 11-Apr-09, at 9:45

Re: serialVersionUID

Brill Pappin wrote: Yes, its fine. you really only need to worry about that kind of thing when you are passing java serialized classes between VMs (as in RMI). In fact, you likely don't really even need to bother for Wicket, and you can turn off that check in Eclipse. If you care about inabili

Re: serialVersionUID

Yah, i used to always add it just for completeness, but I quickly realized its just a bunch of YAGNI junk i don't need cluttering up my code. Now i just turn it off. - Brill Pappin On 11-Apr-09, at 11:14 PM, Jim Pinkham wrote: I'm suprised no one has mentioned the runtime cost of comput

Re: serialVersionUID

Actually i don't think a missing one will cause that to fail unless there are a lot of incompatible changes. However... even if it does matter, *in no way* should anyone depend on a serialized session to store data if your app can't recover from a clean session, you have bigger problem

Re: serialVersionUID

Brill Pappin wrote: Actually i don't think a missing one will cause that to fail unless there are a lot of incompatible changes. Just one incompatible change of class stored in the session and it will not be deserialized. However... even if it does matter, *in no way* should anyone depend o

Re: serialVersionUID

I don't know much about it ... but would something like Terracotta use/require/leverage the serialVersionUID for something not so obvious in normal, singly homed deployments? I think I understand that it helps confirm or explicitly 'version' components that might be working together or across, say

Re: serialVersionUID

> The purpose of the *public* static final long serialVersionUID is for long Why do you stress *public*? private is the norm for serialVersionUID. Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additiona

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

> Both articles avoid the DiskPageStore problem by using the HttpSessionStore, > however if you do a search through the mailing list archives for > HttpSessionStore you'll find numerous references to problems in using it in > the long term and especially in a real, production application, so I don'

Re: Google App Engine and Wicket

But AFAIK GAE doesn't use/guarantee sticky sessions, so I am afraid you can't rely on local memory. "App Engine uses multiple web servers to run your application, and automatically adjusts the number of servers it is using to handle requests reliably. A given request may be routed to any server, a