ket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Converting Wicket Application to fat client (Swing/WebStart)
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Frank Silbermann
wrote:
>
> I have a Wicket application at work that has been well-received by its
> internal users. Because I am not much of a web programmer, and beca
I have a Wicket application at work that has been well-received by its internal
users. Because I am not much of a web programmer, and because it is for
internal use only, I built a bunch of general-purpose panels and base pages
which I use to assemble the application-oriented pages using no ad
[mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:57 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Need Wicket Book
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Frank Silbermann
wrote:
> Does any Wicket book describe the use of Wicket Extensions, such as
> DataTable? I didn't see anyth
Does any Wicket book describe the use of Wicket Extensions, such as
DataTable? I didn't see anything on that subject in _Wicket_in_Action_.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e
What were the reasons for requiring the hierarchies to match in the
original design of Wicket?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
I don't understand your example. You have two forms on one panel. You
wish to move a field (of one of the forms?) to another panel. Doesn't
that imply that you've taken the field out of the form?
-Original Message-
From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com]
If the component hierarchy can be changed without changing behavior or
semantics, then why are the components in a hierarchy to begin with?
Why aren't all the components being moved around already siblings at the
same level? Does Wicket require that the order of sibling Wicket
components match the
Progress is made by people who have understanding, not by the ignorant.
You're not in a position to make suggestions about extending Wicket if
you don't yet understand how to use the powers it already has.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Makundi [mailto:martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com]
As an alternative, suppose that one's non-panel compound component
contained a map from wicket-id's to components. The hierarchy could be
encoded in a lisp-like string; the component's constructor could parse
the string and create the component hierarchy to match. The hierarchy
string could be a
Well then, why don't you have your base panel provide methods that
generate the individual components, with methods that implement
composite behaviors involving groups of components.
Your constructor can call the component-creation methods to assemble the
component hierarchy to match the HTML.
Th
Chris Colman Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:41
PM:
>>
>> The 'popularity' test is very vague but I understand it's purpose,
>> they want to ensure that they use products that are widely used
>> and have an active user community: which is very true of Wicket.
>> Does anyone have some numbers on this? Like
I don't understand the question. I may be viewing the same web page as
you, but that doesn't mean we should share the same computer display
monitor. If there are two copies of the display (yours and mine), then
there should be two copies of the display's components.
What's wrong with just buildi
Single page versus multi-page application?
Some people build a single-page application in which panels are replaced
dynamically. With this approach, the single page is analogous to a
Swing JFrame, to whom components are added and removed (or made visible
or invisible as needed).
Many peopl
Any application that executes _offline_ is not a _web_ application --
unless the system consists of a stand-alone application containing a web
server that runs on the client (e.g. via jetty) so that both client and
server are running on the same box.
Theoretically, a Wicket application that runs o
it's a bad
architecture to rely on SQL errors reported by the database rather than
checking the data, but does this result in a memory leak?
Frank Silbermann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additio
In das neues Deutsches Buch, benuezen die Examplaren Wicket 1.3 odor Wicket
1.4? Lernt man jedes ueber Repeaters (DataTable zum Beispiel)?
Frank Silbermann
-Original Message-
From: Carl-Eric Menzel [mailto:cmen...@wicketbuch.de]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:29 AM
To: users
HTML doesn't like forms inside of forms. What don't you just create an
address panel that belongs inside a form, but which does not provide its
own form?
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud Garcia [mailto:arn...@imagemed-87.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 10:37 AM
...Patient has an Add
I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if the answer is no.
A foundational assumption about the way Wicket works is that a WebPage
object would result from the combination of a WebPage class with a
matching HTML file. When Wicket sees MyPage.html in MyPackage with no
matching class, it assumes
user, then, would be
through Wicket's native mechanisms.
Caution is that I've never done this -- I'm just speculating.
Frank Silbermann, Memphis, Tennessee
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Corbin, James wrote:
> That is exactly the issue that is causing the probl
The question, I think, is how to deliver request-specific parameters
along with the URL to the Wicket page. For example, if a form in a JSP
page is to be processed by a Wicket page, how can the JSP's form data to
be delivered to the Wicket page?
Is that the question?
> -Original Message-
Create a panel with dummy components (e.g. Label components where the
label is an empty string). Later you can "replace" one or more of the
components.
One complication is that some wicket components (e.g. Image) need to be
attached to specialized HTML. However, the basic principle still
stands.
delegete to referenced component. Uses safe
> getComponent() method */
> public void setComponentModel(IModel model)
> {
> getComponent().setModel(model);
> }
>
>
>
> michal
>
>
> 2009/10/29 Frank Silbermann :
>>
>> I was discussing glue for composi
getComponent().setModel(model);
}
michal
2009/10/29 Frank Silbermann :
>
> I was discussing glue for composing reusable panels into web pages on
> the blog of Erik van Oosten
> (http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/09/16/wicket-dos-and-donts/).
>
> I told him that my approach h
child) {
leftNavChildren.add(child);
}
protected String newLeftNavChildId() {
return leftNavChildren.newChildId();
}
}
public class SubPage extends BasePage {
public SubPage() {
addLeftNavChild(new MyNavPanel(newLeftNavC
I was discussing glue for composing reusable panels into web pages on
the blog of Erik van Oosten
(http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/09/16/wicket-dos-and-donts/).
I told him that my approach had been to create an abstract base page
that constructs the common elements while leaving place-holders for
page-
I, too, am trying to have my application download MS Excel files. Until now,
mine have contained the content of a DataTable, using the code I received
from the mailing list three years ago:
Button button = new Button("excelExport") {
public void onSubmit() {
getRequestCycle().setRequ
In my Wicket 1.2 application I used PageParameters like a simple
HashMap, calling:
pageParameters.put(keyString, valueString)
and
String s = (String) pageParameters.get(keyString)
After upgrading to Wicket 1.3 the GET is causing a ClassCastException:
[Ljava.lang.String; cannot be cast to ja
stions.
>
> as for dep types.
> A war can be depended upon just like a jar (or anything else for that
> matter) you simply specify the type:
>
> com.mypackage
> mywebapp
> 1.0.0XXX
> war
>
>
> - Brill Pappin
>
>
> On 19-Jun-08, at 10:59 AM
mywebapp
1.0.0XXX
war
- Brill Pappin
On 19-Jun-08, at 10:59 AM, Frank Silbermann wrote:
> I have a question about packaging. I have two Wicket web
> applications
> that display data for two different corporate areas, but the
> look-and-feel are similar. There
I have a question about packaging. I have two Wicket web applications
that display data for two different corporate areas, but the
look-and-feel are similar. Therefore, I coded in Wicket a tool project
consisting of a bunch of higher-level problem-specific components that
my two projects should
tion question
Forget the pom. Paste the output from "mvn dependency:list"
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having a weird compilation issue. I built an application working
> from the QuickStart which used wicket-extensions_1
I am having a weird compilation issue. I built an application working
from the QuickStart which used wicket-extensions_1.3 and
wicket-datetime_1.3. To download the dependencies I added the necessary
lines to my pom.xml and I entered "mvn eclipse:eclipse" to be sure that
the dependencies would be
This question pertains to the infrastructure provided with the
QuickStart, but not specifically with Wicket, so you might want to
replay via e-mail rather than to the list.
When I use Maven to package my application, it appends a version number
(or SNAPSHOT indicator) into the name of my .war fil
Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a few more experiments with static images in Wicket 1.3 and
> narrowed the problem down to my use of AttributeModifier:
>
> Consider a Wicket home page with no components that displays a static
>
users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket 1.2 -> 1.3 upgrade question
well, package an example project that demonstrates it and attach it to
jira
-igor
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding the filterMappingUrlPattern didn't s
Never mind. I rebooted my machine and everything is back to normal.
Sigh.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Silbermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 4:19 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Using Java 1.5 features with Wicket 1.3
No, I do not compile
you compile Wicket yourself? If so, this should be compiled using
--source 1.4. Your own code can stay with --source 1.5.
Timm
Am Freitag, 13. Juni 2008 22:58:53 schrieb Frank Silbermann:
> In my Wicket 1.2 application I used a Java 1.5 JDK. Wicket didn't
> seem to mind that I used
In my Wicket 1.2 application I used a Java 1.5 JDK. Wicket didn't seem
to mind that I used annotations, etc. in my own code. I did the same in
code that I upgraded to Wicket 1.3. Also, my Wicket 1.2 application was
built from scratch using JBuilder 2006; but the
stop-server/modify-code/compile/r
une 13, 2008 3:10 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket 1.2 -> 1.3 upgrade question
guess so
-igor
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like this?
>
> xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee";
>
tring filterMapping =
filterConfig.getInitParameter(WicketFilter.FILTER_MAPPING_PARAM);
}
-igor
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, there is a element that maps to
> .
>
> However, as I mentioned in
> http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-%28Cla
s a JIRA issue?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 12:53 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket 1.2 -> 1.3 upgrade question
you have to give the mapping as a config param to the filter also, i
forget the exact name right
Wicket 1.3 is configured as a filter rather than as a servlet. The
Quickstart shows a filter whose URL-PATTERN is "/*".
The project that I wish to upgrade contains two Wicket 1.2 application
servlets (two different home-pages accessed via different URLs), and one
plain-vanilla non-Wicket servlet
ation generated by the Wicket quickstart on our
website serves static images perfectly well. You really are doing
something funky.
Martijn
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, the QuickStart itself works. As for your ability to serve
>
uld that discussion have anything to do with my problem?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:23 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart
>
> The q
ect: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart
The quickstart works for me without modifications. It serves images,
etc. out of the box, every time.
Martijn
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Searching for some clue as to why my m
ation#getConfigurationType() for more information. ***
INFO - log- Started
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080
-Original Message-
From: Frank Silbermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:41 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.9
ssage-
From: Gwyn Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:51 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Frank Silbermann <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My application uses images muc
quot;Picture"/ >
The image appears when I run the application in Tomcat, but not when I
run it in Eclipse with Jetty (following the process described in
http://herebebeasties.com/2007-10-07/wicket-quickstart/). What do I
need to change to the QuickStart's Jetty configuration
at least a log4j jar
somewhere in tomcat install..
we have deployed in 5.5 and 6.0 previously and everything works fine.
-igor
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The lib directory in the QuickStart's WEB-INF contains:
>
>log4j
nk it'll help you:
http://commons.apache.org/logging/troubleshooting.html#Apache%20Tomcat
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Documentation for the jcl-over-slf4j.jar () says it replaces
> commons-logging.jar -- which I cannot fi
ssage-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 1:48 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart
And if you use toimcat 6?
It could be classloading problems one (commons) cant find the stuff in
the web folder
On 6/6/
sible...)
>
> /Gwyn
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Frank Silbermann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The lib directory in the QuickStart's WEB-INF contains:
>>
>>log4j-1.2.14.jar
t: Re: Tomcat 5.5.9 isn't running Quickstart
you have to at least also have log4j in there somewhere.
commons-logging is just the pipeline..
-igor
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, aside from the logging-oriented jars that m
ith your logger jars
-igor
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, yes, I thought I had checked those, but I must have missed the
> right log. The error messages are:
>
> The catalina.log file contains:
>
> INFO: Stopping ser
49 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any suggestions as to where I should look for clues?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 10:46 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tomca
y its not running in tomcat
-igor
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the quickstart program and have been able to run it in Eclipse
> following the directions in
> http://herebebeasties.com/2007-10-07/wicket-quickstart/
>
> Als
I have the quickstart program and have been able to run it in Eclipse
following the directions in
http://herebebeasties.com/2007-10-07/wicket-quickstart/
Also, I used "mvn package" to build the web application and .war
I tried copying the myproject-1.0-SNAPSHOT folder (and I also tried the
.war f
call setReuseItems(true) on the listview that contains radio components.
javadoc of listview recommends this for listviews inside forms that
contain formcomponents.
-igor
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the URL of my jira is
w recommends this for listviews inside
> forms that contain formcomponents.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Frank Silbermann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's the URL of my jira issue.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro
, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the URL of my jira issue.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1601
>
> The issue has attached a quickstart project and a screen print.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto
e.org
Subject: Re: Bug introduced somewhere after 1.2.2 is still in 1.3.3
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote earlier about my problems going from Wicket 1.2.2 to Wicket
> 1.2.6. This has to do with a RadioGroup component that I built;
May 08, 2008 12:13 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bug introduced somewhere after 1.2.2 is still in 1.3.3
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote earlier about my problems going from Wicket 1.2.2 to Wicket
> 1.2.6. This has t
is is, but 1.2 is pretty much end of life, so you
should try to debug what it is and patch your version Or just use a 1.2
version that works for you
On 4/29/08, Frank Silbermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by "what part it really is"? Are you
s a screencast there that will show you everything. It was real
helpful.
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Silbermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 1:52 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Difficulty getting QuickStart
>
>
> I wrote
When I was developing in Wicket 1.2 I used Jbuilder 2006; it was what
the employer provided. Other developers, however, use Eclipse for their
(non-Wicket) projects, and Jbuilder 2007/8 are Eclipse-based, so I
figured might might as well start my Wicket 1.3 experiments using
Eclipse.
What are th
So when do we get the Addison-Wesley book on _Wicket_Patterns_? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Marrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 5:51 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Advisory question
The nice thing about wicket is that it will give you free
some sort? Or, perhaps an HTTP proxy
server?
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote in earlier about a problem I had in less-old releases of
> Wicket 1.2. Since no more work is being done on that version, I
> thought I'd try the
I wrote in earlier about a problem I had in less-old releases of Wicket
1.2. Since no more work is being done on that version, I thought I'd
try the sample on Wicket 1.2. I figured the easiest approach was to
download the Wicket 1.3 QuickStart application. That requires Maven,
which I've never b
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 3:54 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Change to API between Wicket 1.2 releases?
1.2 is a long time ago
I have no idea what change did break yours (and what did it fix) If you
could figure out what part it really is?
johan
On Tu
I completed a Wicket 1.2 project a couple of years ago, and I've been
maintaining it since then. I've been using Version 1.2.2 successfully,
and figured I might as well use the lastest release of that version
(1.2.7). Well, I'm trying to figure out why Wicket 1.2.7 broke my code.
(I scrounged up a
70 matches
Mail list logo
