Thanks Igor. I was already running 1.4.7, but I just upgraded to 1.4.9 and
that solved the problem. But strange that the bugfix wasn't mentioned on the
http://wicket.apache.org/news.html page.
Regards
/Jimi
Igor Vaynberg-2 wrote:
i think this is fixed in 1.4.7+, you should upgrade
it is client side (ie javascript) behavior, not server side java behavior.
Regards
/Jimi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Javascript-string-formatting-problem-with-DateTextField-and-DatePicker-tp2241433p2241433.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing
do to get the correct wicket-date.js? Or
should I report this as a bug somewhere? The way I see it, the javascript
should check if the datepattern matches and then leave the year as it
is.
/Jimi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Javascript-string
implement
IRequestCodingStrategy? If so, is there some good class I can extend so I
don't have to implement all myself (the decode-method of
WebRequestCodingStrategy is final)? Is there maybe even some existing
example that I can take a look at?
Regards
/Jimi
--
View this message in context:
http
Thats great news. Thanks Igor.
/Regards
Jimi
Igor Vaynberg-2 wrote:
ive added this...you can take advantage of it in the next release or
via a snapshot you build yourself..
/**
* Creates markup id for the input tag used to generate the checkbox
for the element
about this? The way I see it the class
CheckBoxMultipleChoice should provide a way to get hold of the markup ids of
the checkboxes. Preferably it should add real wicket objects.
Is there any way around this problem?
Regards
/Jimi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4
, maybe during the upcoming public holiday this week.
/Jim
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Can you reopen that issue and attach a quickstart that demonstrates the
problem?
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Jimi jimi.hulleg...@mogul.com wrote
Erik van Oosten wrote:
This might be related to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2600?
Well, it sure is related, and that ticket is marked as resolved with 1.4.5.
But the bug still exist in 1.4.7, at least for me.
/Jimi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket
Not being an expert in either Wicket, HTML or javascript/ajax, I would say
this is not really a Wicket issue... If it is possible in Javascript/Ajax
then it is possible with Wicket.
Maybe this discussion can help:
. Maybe .
4) people use some other framework
1 and 2 seems just plain wrong, the way I see it. If 3 or 4 is the case I
would love to hear about it from someone.
/Jimi
You can use Spring security with wicket auth-roles, I works out pretty
nice
compared to the alternatives. iirc You need do your
be exactly the same for a lot of projects, and then it
would be logical to have a shared base for all these projects, maybe as a
part of SWARM/WASP, or wicket auth roles or wicket-shiro.
Regards
/Jimi
I have a SpringSecurityWebApplication and SpringSecurityWebSession
class you can use if you
Reinout wrote:
Op dinsdag 27-04-2010 om 16:20 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Jimi:
2. Seems old. [wicket auth roles + WASP/SWARM] Found a two year old
discussion labeled is wicket-auth-roles discontinued?. And the
comments on
the Getting started with Swarm wiki page is from 2007 and 2008
for a great project, by the way. I'm starting to like it more and
more now. :)
/Jimi
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-security-what-are-the-best-options-Spring-Security-reached-almost-all-the-way-tp2068415p2075000.html
Sent from the Wicket - User
more then welcome!
Regards
/Jimi Hullegård
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-security-what-are-the-best-options-Spring-Security-reached-almost-all-the-way-tp2068415p2068415.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
