Re: Wicket clustering without web server clustering

Hi Dmitry, I'm cc'ing the memcached-session-manager list so that we could take this thread over to this list... On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 15:38 -0700, DmitryM wrote: > Martin, > > Thanks a lot for the reply. > Actually, I would appreciate if you helped me. > I tried your tomcat session manager with

Re: Wicket clustering without web server clustering

fresh session (the webapp doesn't store anything in the Http session > directly)? > > I mean, does Wicket store anything else for its functional purposes in the > Http Session (which I may need to distribute via Hazelcast)? > > Thanks, > Dmitry -- Martin Grotzke http://twitter.com/martin_grotzke signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: root context, IE, home page is not found

icket 1.4.7 and the web application is deployed as ROOT context on > > Tomcat 6.0.26. > > > > Is there no solution for this? > > > > Regards > > /Jimi > > > > -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: WicketTester fails with a custom WebRequestCodingStrategy

Hi, no feedback so far. It would be really nice if s.o. familiar with WicketTester could a look at this. Thanx && cheers, Martin On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 21:21 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote: > Hi, > > I have an issue with a simple app working fine when run in the app > server

WicketTester fails with a custom WebRequestCodingStrategy

Hi, I have an issue with a simple app working fine when run in the app server, but where the test (using WicketTester) that simulates the performed behaviour fails. Here are the details: I have a custom RequestCycleProcessor with a custom WebRequestCodingStrategy that mounts a page (for e.g. a s

Re: Don't increment the Session.pageIdCounter for stateless pages?

*must* be stateless. And in this case, the pageIdCounter should also not be modified. What do you think? Cheers, Martin On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 00:18 +0100, Martin Grotzke wrote: > There are cases where pages are intended to be stateless (and might get > annotated with @StatelessComponent). At

Re: Don't increment the Session.pageIdCounter for stateless pages?

. > > -Matej > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Martin Grotzke > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > just submitted this as > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2782 > > > > I tried incrementing the pageId when the page's numericId is fi

Re: Don't increment the Session.pageIdCounter for stateless pages?

ct that the id is available right > away. > > please create a jira issue for this > > -igor > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Martin Grotzke > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the Page.init(PageMap) invokes setNextAvailableId(), which invokes > > getSession().ne

AW: Re: Don't increment the Session.pageIdCounter for stateless pages?

create a jira issue for this -igor On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Martin Grotzke wrote: > Hi, > > the Page.init(PageMap) invokes setNextAvailableId(), which invokes > getSession().nextPageId() if isPageIdUniquePerSession is set. > > getSession().nextPageId() modifies the Sessi

Don't increment the Session.pageIdCounter for stateless pages?

Hi, the Page.init(PageMap) invokes setNextAvailableId(), which invokes getSession().nextPageId() if isPageIdUniquePerSession is set. getSession().nextPageId() modifies the Session.pageIdCounter. When I have a session and afterwards access a stateless page, the Session.pageIdCounter is the only d

Re: tomcat session replication

---------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: tomcat session replication

son > > wrote: > >> Has anybody had success with wicket using tomcat's session replication? > >> > >> D/ > > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: test for dropdownchoice with ajax - response is homepage always

cute ... > } > > { > // Operation 2 > FormTester f1 = tester.newFormTester (...); > f1.setValue > f1.submit > } > > > ** > Martin > > > > > Thanx && cheers, > > Martin > > > > > >> > >> **

Re: test for dropdownchoice with ajax - response is homepage always

so that you can see what I actually changed. Thanx && cheers, Martin > > ** > Martin > > 2009/12/1 Martin Grotzke : > > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 11:44 +0200, Martin Makundi wrote: > >> > Thanx for your feedback! Did you have a look at http://is.gd/58mq3

Re: test for dropdownchoice with ajax - response is homepage always

ested page class: http://is.gd/58mDm > >> > > >> > I'm using wicket 1.4.3. > >> > > >> > Is there any error in the test? Can I do anything to work around this, > >> > or is it a bug? > >> > > >> > Thanx && cheers, > >

Re: test for dropdownchoice with ajax - response is homepage always

gt; > http://is.gd/58mq3 > > This is the tested page class: http://is.gd/58mDm > > > > I'm using wicket 1.4.3. > > > > Is there any error in the test? Can I do anything to work around this, > > or is it a bug? > > > > Thanx && cheers, &

test for dropdownchoice with ajax - response is homepage always

://is.gd/58mDm I'm using wicket 1.4.3. Is there any error in the test? Can I do anything to work around this, or is it a bug? Thanx && cheers, Martin -- Martin Grotzke http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Close ModalWindow on ESC key pressed

Hi, I want to close a modal window when the user presses the ESC key. Right now I have overridden the show method in our ModalWindow subclass and added the keypress event listener (using jquery), the javascript close function is just copied from the ModalWindow. Opening the modal window and clos

Re: Lazy loading via AJAX on stateless pages?

Hi, reposting - can somebody help with this? Thanx in advance, cheers, Martin On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 00:33 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote: > Now in the default constructor of my page I added a behavior linking to > the page with page parameters and I added such a constructor taking > p

Re: New site developed in wicket - WWW.FITCOMPLEX.SK

Congrats! A nice site and really fast! You're mentioning stateless ajax with jquery: can you give some pointers how you did this? Cheers, Martin On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 18:22 +0200, Stefan Simik wrote: > New site about health, nutrition, exercise and life > style >

Re: Lazy loading via AJAX on stateless pages?

o the component that generated the URL. > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Martin Grotzke < > martin.grot...@javakaffee.de> wrote: > > > What exactly causes the page to be stateful when urlF

Re: Lazy loading via AJAX on stateless pages?

othing on your page calls urlfor(component, interface) - > this is what causes the page to be stateful. > > -igor > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Martin Grotzke > wrote: > > Wow, very fast response! > > > > Is it possible to use wicket concepts like Req

Re: Lazy loading via AJAX on stateless pages?

e markup on your page with returned markup. > > -igor > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Martin Grotzke > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > can somebody help with this? > > > > Thanx && cheers, > > Martin > > > > > > On Mon, 200

Re: Lazy loading via AJAX on stateless pages?

Hello, can somebody help with this? Thanx && cheers, Martin On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 12:16 +0200, martin.grot...@javakaffee.de wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently evaluating how it's possible to have stateless pages with > some information loaded asynchronously via AJAX. > > I found these postings th

Lazy loading via AJAX on stateless pages?

Hi, I'm currently evaluating how it's possible to have stateless pages with some information loaded asynchronously via AJAX. I found these postings that are somehow related to this http://www.nabble.com/Stateless-AJAX-links-td20031309.html http://www.nabble.com/Directions-for-Stateless-Ajax-td175

Re: Caching of rendered panels

Hi, I also thought about s.th. like this because we'll have very complex component graphs that have to be composed dynamically based on the language of the user and ~3 other things. I thought about caching complete component instances, but didn't come so far that I thought about how this could be

Re: Client-side models for zero-state scalability

Hi Matej, sounds interesting, also the approach with PageParametersAware (and PageParametersForm). Do you thought about writing a short description of how this approach works? This would be really helpful, as I don't see the whole picture until now. Cheers, Martin On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 12:04 +0

Re: Wicket WebBeans Project...

On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 11:53 -0400, James Carman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Martin Grotzke > wrote: > > Just for consideration: this would create a jar like "webbeans-1.4.jar" > > which would be confusing... > > Right, that's w

Re: Wicket WebBeans Project...

On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 10:01 -0500, Jeremy Thomerson wrote: > If the original WWB project isn't active - I don't think it would be a > problem to take over the name. > > If there is a problem with doing that, what about wicket-openwebbeans? > > Or, in wicketstuff-core, we have removed the "wicket-

Re: memcached session store

ck > >> but wasnt on the page of the first click. Then you will get an page > >> expired > >> or something like that.. > >> > >> maybe somehow containers do some synching across concurrent request > >> of 1 > >> session (hopefully

Re: memcached session store

e to do that because you have > some kind of configuration on the serverside What do you want to say with this? I don't understand this. Cheers, Martin > > johan > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 18:17, Martin Grotzke > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > One

Re: memcached session store

t; But i dont know. Synching over servers is very expensive.. then the whole > usage of having none sticky sessions is completely gone in my eyes. > > johan > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:49, Martin Grotzke > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 22:54 -0700, Victor Igumno

Re: memcached session store

On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 09:31 -0700, Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > Just to be complete, even if this is not really an option for us: with > > ONE_PASS_RENDER clustering with wicket would be fine, no further state > > management issues, right? > > Right. And there is back button support (access to olde

Re: memcached session store

other component oriented frameworks ;) Cheers, Martin > > > On Mar 9, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Martin Grotzke wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 13:07 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > >> Starts to sound like a form of premature optimization. If you are new > >> to W

Re: memcached session store

vailable, it would require rendering all > content again, requiring fetching all entities, etc. from the > database. > > Martijn > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Martin Grotzke > wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 13:07 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > >> Star

Re: memcached session store

sing REDIRECT_TO_RENDER in wicket? Cheers, Martin > > Martijn > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Martin Grotzke > wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 13:07 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > >> Starts to sound like a form of premature optimization. If you are

Re: memcached session store

atever we're not decided yet, still running in evaluation mode :) Cheers, Martin > > Martijn > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Martin Grotzke > wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 16:56 -0700, Victor Igumnov wrote: > >> I wrote a memcached session manager sto

Re: memcached session store

e things easier, and you could even try it out, perhaps > > saving a memcached implementation completely :) > > > > Martijn > > > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Martin Grotzke > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> we're just thinkin

Re: memcached session store

09-03-08 at 23:25 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > You can check the TIM integration work from the Terracotta guys. That > should make things easier, and you could even try it out, perhaps > saving a memcached implementation completely :) > > Martijn > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 a

memcached session store

Hi, we're just thinking about a session store using memcached. I just want to ask if somebody already implemented this (and wants to share) before we implement this. Btw, is there some documentation about ISessionStore semantics, in addition to javadocs? I would be interested in the order in whic