Re: Proposal: the browser as a desktop client

ogic runs > Its a complete different paradigm > > if thinks that are now done in onclick() or onsubmit() would run on the > client > what would be possible then? Currently many people just call DAO's there > (spring stuff and so on) > > johan > > > On Thu, Oct 23,

Re: Proposal: the browser as a desktop client

things like validators that could be precompiled not th > complete webapp and all your current page/panel/component/html code > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:44 PM, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to propose we leverag

Re: Proposal: the browser as a desktop client

I just to clarify one point. You would still have three types of components: HTML CSS Java You would still be binding the Java code against HTML IDs (clean separation of concerns). The only thing that would change is where the Java code executes. -- View this message in context: http://www.nab

Proposal: the browser as a desktop client

Hi, I'd like to propose we leverage existing Java to Javascript compilers to improve Wicket on a couple of fronts. If you think of the web browser as a desktop client involved in a client-server architecture then it becomes obvious that Wicket is currently asking the server to handle a lot of log

Mixing Wicket and JAX-RS

Hi, I was wondering how smart WicketFilter is about picking up requests. Ideally, I want it to only pick up HTTP GET/POST requests that take HTML output and leave all other requests (against the same URL) to JAX-RS's filter to pick up. This relates to the limitations listed at the bottom of http:

Re: Need help fixing bug #1816

Johan, The fix looks good. I no longer get warnings under Glassfish. Thank you, Gili cowwoc wrote: > > According to > http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/javax/servlet/ServletRequest.html#setCharacterEncoding(java.lang.String): > > "This method must be cal

Re: Need help fixing bug #1816

is only the > getParameters of the getLastModified wat is a problem > > > johan > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I spent a few hours tracking down the cause of >> https://issues

Need help fixing bug #1816

Hi, I spent a few hours tracking down the cause of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1816 but now I need someone from the Wicket team to help me fix it. Can someone please fix the lines of code I mention in the report and then send me back a patched version for testing? To be clear:

Injecting Wicket Pages using Google Guice

Hi, I've uploaded a patch that makes Wicket Pages (bookmarkable or otherwise) injectable using Google Guice: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1705 Thank you, Gili -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Injecting-Wicket-Pages-using-Google-Guice-tp17934024p17934024.ht

Re: Using Guice with IInitializer?

vletContext sc=((WebApplication)app).getServletContext(); > > } > > -igor > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:04 AM, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Can anyone think of a way to inject members into an IInitializer or at >> least >

Using Guice with IInitializer?

Hi, Can anyone think of a way to inject members into an IInitializer or at least gain access to an Injector instance inside it? As far as I can tell I can't even get access to the Servlet Context or Application from inside the IInitializer. I'm open to suggestions. Thanks, Gili -- View this mes

Re: Making Component easier to Generify

have to deal > with, thats *my* problem to resolve. > > In my book (and I'm not the only one) excessive use of final is an > anti-pattern. > > - Brill Pappin > > On 12-Jun-08, at 10:01 AM, cowwoc wrote: > >> >> Brill, >> >> This is ac

Re: Making Component easier to Generify

ng else and seem to be trying to "protect > users from themselves". > > - Brill Pappin > > > On 12-Jun-08, at 1:03 AM, cowwoc wrote: > >> >> >> Have you considered moving from subclassing to composition in Wicket >> using >> C

Re: Making Component easier to Generify

urrent > generics approach this would probably also radically increase > component memory footprint. > > -Matej > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:03 AM, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Have you considered moving from subclassing to composition in Wicket &

Making Component easier to Generify

Have you considered moving from subclassing to composition in Wicket using Callable? Currently it is quite common for developers to subclass a component in order to override isVisible() and other properties. I am proposing that instead the component classes become final and properties may only b

And The Fastest Growing Web Framework Is...

This might be of interest to the Wicket community: http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t101110.html -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/And-The-Fastest-Growing-Web-Framework-Is...-tf4392768.html#a12524620 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.