My keyboard on has 2 keys: 0 and 1.
Thats all i need when i code :)
NM
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Chris Colman wrote:
> While we're on the subject of 1's and 0's:
>
> Did you know this? There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those
> who understand binary, and those who don't.
>
>
While we're on the subject of 1's and 0's:
Did you know this? There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those
who understand binary, and those who don't.
Back in my day we didn't need Tapestry, or Wicket or WebObjects, or even
Servlets, or for that matter Java! We just coded in plain assem
-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p273
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> i thought they were all stored as electrons
My vote goes to Umpalumpa's shifting miniature pumpkins on scales
Martijn
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety f
;
>>>> I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java
>>>> provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate
>>>> this
>>>> class & encourage usage of TimeUnit?
>>>>
>>>> Alex Objelea
was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java
>>> provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate
>>> this
>>> class & encourage usage of TimeUnit?
>>>
>>> Alex Objelean
>>>
>>>
>>
ss & encourage usage of TimeUnit?
> >>
> >> Alex Objelean
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html
> > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing lis
> I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java
> >>> provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate
> >>> this
> >>> class & encourage usage of TimeUnit?
> >>>
> >>> Alex Objelea
ate
>>> this
>>> class & encourage usage of TimeUnit?
>>>
>>> Alex Objelean
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html
>> Sent
uld wicket need Duration class as long as java
>> provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate
>> this
>> class & encourage usage of TimeUnit?
>>
>> Alex Objelean
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> h
e usage of TimeUnit?
>
> Alex Objelean
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Hej,
2010/1/26 Objelean Alex :
> I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java
> provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate this
> class & encourage usage of TimeUnit?
If I am correct TimeUnit doesn't store a duration, it is used for
informing a
java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit only covers units from nanos to seconds
(in java 1.5, that is)
So before wicket moves to java 1.6 we probably have a 'no go' here...
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Objelean Alex wrote:
> I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java
> provide
I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java
provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate this
class & encourage usage of TimeUnit?
Alex Objelean
14 matches
Mail list logo
