Wicket / Spring bean annotations

2009-01-20 Thread Andrew Humphries (MEL)
Hi - Probably a simple question : We are using Spring with Wicket in our project. I have opted for the use of the Spring bean annotations as described in 'Wicket in Action'. In the chapter on integrating the two technologies the book explains that you should use proxies instead of direct refer

Re: Wicket / Spring bean annotations

2009-01-20 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
Although I do not know for sure, I would think not, because my understanding is that a proxy is created that is safe to be serialized. However, I would ask *why* do this? If you're passing it to another component, why not just have that component also use an annotation? I wouldn't think that pas

RE: Wicket / Spring bean annotations

2009-01-20 Thread Andrew Humphries (MEL)
ry 2009 11:03 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Wicket / Spring bean annotations Although I do not know for sure, I would think not, because my understanding is that a proxy is created that is safe to be serialized. However, I would ask *why* do this? If you're passing it to anoth

Re: Wicket / Spring bean annotations

2009-01-20 Thread James Carman
und the reference. I'll stick to doing > that, but I was also intersted out of curiosity. > > Andrew > > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2009 11:03 AM > To: users@wicket.apache.org >

Re: Wicket / Spring bean annotations

2009-01-20 Thread Igor Vaynberg
some components and not > others, and then passing around the reference. I'll stick to doing > that, but I was also intersted out of curiosity. > > Andrew > > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 21 January

Re: Wicket / Spring bean annotations

2009-01-20 Thread Igor Vaynberg
lso intersted out of curiosity. >> >> Andrew >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2009 11:03 AM >> To: users@wicket.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Wicket / Spring bean annotations >