implement support for HEAD request
-igor
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I have this servlet that is called from wicket only using a url
> /Files/thefile.jpg
> The servlet is url-mapped on /Files/*. But it is very slow and I was just
> w
setoutputmarkupplaceholdertag(true)
-igor
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's another boolean on component that you should set to true. It will
> output a container where the component should be, even if the component is
> invisible. Unfortuna
we havent done it yet because it is an API break. so we have been
waiting for wicket1.5/2.0 whatever to do this.
-igor
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:17 AM, atul singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can do that within a day or 2..(Meaning with the patch..).does any core
> dev see an issue if info,debu
after using 1.4 full time i am more and more coming around to this
point of view also.
disclaimer: terms like "vast majority" are based on my own coding experience...
the fact is, it doesnt matter how often you use models in components,
its how often you actually have to cast the model object to
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Timo Rantalaiho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jun 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>> i am willing to drop component model support if the following can be met:
>
> "component model support" -- ?
generifying component for the sa
i guess my question is: if you have a list and you are never going to
put anything inside it, do you think a generic type is still useful?
there are plenty of usecases where component's default model slot is
not used, so why do we have to generify it? even if the mix is 50/50
that means 50% is comp
im really curious to hear what these changes would be...
-igor
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Brill Pappin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think...
>
> We should be able to use the untyped variants, but the explanations for why
> that won't work directly was valid.
>
> So on to you're A/B quest
ould have produced
> something a bit different.
>
> - Brill Pappin
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:42 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: users, please give us your opinion: what is your
;
> - Brill Pappin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:25 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AW: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on
> generics with Wicket
>
>
all added validators are ANDed together. if you want to add an OR you
have to roll your own validator.
-igor
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:16 AM, liny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to have a text field that can validate multi values, like below:
>
> FormComponent fc;
> fc = new Require
if the table is the only expensive component on your page then there
is really no advantage to using ajax since you are adding all the
overhead of javascript processing without saving anything.
-igor
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have observed th
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:19 AM, jd17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The first and most important one is the fact that per default Wicket now
> makes css ids unique, which isn't even mentioned in the migration guide (Can
> you please add it?). I make heavy use of css in my application and it was
> r
not really sure what to tell you other then my impression is that it
is false by default...
-igor
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:47 AM, jd17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, Igor,
> thanks for replying, but I do not understand your statement. My impression
> is that the default is true, otherwise I w
no it is not possible. in wicket the view is dumb, it contains no
knowledge or logic. if, for example, the person has first name and
last name and you wanted to output a full name you would have to do
the concatenation in java code, and the view would simply have placeholder. in wicket everything
you can also subclass propertycolumn itself
-igor
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Steve Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm creating a AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable, just as shown in the live
> examples, and things are working great. My only problem though is
> that I would like to scramble
implemented fairly well without too much
> impact on the users.
>
> - Brill Pappin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:21 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: users, please give us
you can use something like add(new
HeaderContributor.forCss(pageA.class, "filename")) on pageA and it
should work from anywhere.
-igor
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Manuel Corrales
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, i am starting new wicket application, my first one. I think this is an
> awesome
can you paste the stack trace please? are you using latest trunk?
-igor
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 6:38 AM, nitinkc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I need an example of wicketstuff-minis' veil behavior. I added this to one of
> my components but keep getting the error that the behavior is already boun
are you on 1.4, i checked in a change that will allow ajaxbutton to
utilize getonclickscript() within the ajax handler it generates...
-igor
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Eyal Golan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more thing.
> If I understand correctly, AjaxButton should override the getOnCli
gt; Starting with 2 users of your code makes a significant impact on what it
> looks like in the end.
> I applied the same thoughts to using generics from the start, and realized
> the API would likely be a bit different. Exactly how much, I wouldn't
> presume to guess.
>
> -
i think we should have qualified this rfi with a requirement that
responders use 1.4 on a non-trivial project...these things only become
apparent from real-world day-to-day usage. anything else is pretty
much speculation.
-igor
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i think we should have qualified this rfi with a requirement that
>> responders use 1.4 on a non-trivial project
nothing right now because its not implemented yet. in the future you
will have access to a Window class and be able to subclass it to store
your own data, just like you do with Session now...
-igor
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:29 AM, geke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need a scope for ever
but if you start two threads you are twice as likely to get an answer...
-igor
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See my reply in the other thread.
>
> Oh and next time could you keep it to one thread ;) thanks.
>
> Maurice
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:1
Will the universe deadlock?
>
> Martijn
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> but if you start two threads you are twice as likely to get an answer...
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Maurice M
you are not doing anything wrong, that is how things are meant to work.
-igor
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Kai Mütz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a ListView nested in a CheckGroup which works actually fine. In some
> cases I have to disable (or make invisible) a certain Check wit
why even have an interface? just detach all imodel fields via reflection!
-igor
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:37 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Eelco Hillenius
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> it all depends, on how and what you're developing.
>>
>> Yeah
4, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> why even have an interface? just detach all imodel fields via reflection!
>>
>> -igor
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:37 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>&
it is possible, just depends on how you set up your models. it is not
possible by directly reading the collection of checkgroup, but you can
come up with a different way.
-igor
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Kai Mütz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Igor Vaynberg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
this has been asked a ton of times already...so do search the lists
next time. just to reiterate, servlet container always does this on
first request because it doesnt know if the cookies are enabled or not
until the second request. if cookies are enabled jsessionid will go
away on second request.
snapshots are available daily from wicketstuff repo. we have a
teamcity instance that builds them quiet often.
-igor
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Ricky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there an estimated release date for Wicket 1.3.4 or for 1.3-SNAPSHOT ?
>
> Regards,
> Vyas, Anirudh
>
-igor
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> you still have ondetach()...but for convinience we can automatically
>> detach any imodel fields, i actually wa
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sounds way too complicated to me dude...
>>
>> component.detach() {
>> for (field:fields) {
honestly i havent noticed any slow performance on ie...
-igor
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Niels Bo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, but we have many other things on the page.
>
> But why is it so slow? Is Wicket using some js functions that is extra slow
> in IE?
>
> If you google for "I
i dont think it exposes anything, or that anything is flawed. the
component provides a slot for a default model - it is there totally
out of convinience. i think what is flawed here is that we tied the
two types via generics.
for example, sometimes i want to have a webmarkupcontainer with a
model
like i said, i dont mind removing the default slot if we add nice
automatic detachment for fields.
-igor
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i dont thin
> }
> }
>
> Detachment will then be automatic.
>
> Sven
>
>
> Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
>>
>> you still have ondetach()...but for convinience we can automatically
>> detach any imodel fields, i actually wanted to do this for a while...
>>
>> -igo
that is what validators are for
-igor
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Ned Collyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have the requirement where I need to validate things like image format,
> height, width etc for a file upload.
>
> I'd like to do this using validators, which I can do - but
argh, didnt read closely enough. yes that is the right way to do it,
in fact you shouldnt have to do that at all, fileuploadfield should be
doing that...
please create a jira ticket, that component is pretty old so it
probably got overlooked. multifileuploadfield does it properly
already.
-igor
right, so like that its not going to work. you need a model in between
that can buffer values and insert missing checked by disabled values.
-igor
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Kai Mütz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Igor Vaynberg <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> it is p
g to
think about
-igor
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> like matej already told you
> There is no default "slot" or field..
> A component with no model doesnt have a a slot what so ever.
>
> johan
>
>
> On W
you should use embedded forms
form->listview->item->form+formvalidators->formcomponents
instead of
form+formvalidators->listview->item->formcomponents
-igor
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Martin Makundi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use setReuseitems true yes.
>
> I must call the removeAll b
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This might also screw up stuff like CompoundPropertyModel, no? We
> discussed this a bit on ##wicket.
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i didnt mean the memory slot, i ment the actual default model ea
gt;
> I think HTML does not approve embedded forms, does it? So should I
> tweak this using renderBodyOnly or similar?
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2008/6/5 Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> you should use embedded forms
>>
>> form->listview->item-&
can you try with 1.3 trunk. if that doesnt work create a quickstart and jira it.
-igor
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:56 PM, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been stepping through the code, but I'm having a tough time
> figuring this one out...
>
> Using 1.3.
>
> I have one page mounte
correct course of action is to figure out why its not running in tomcat
-igor
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the quickstart program and have been able to run it in Eclipse
> following the directions in
> http://herebebeasties.com/2007-10-07/wi
how about the tomcat log...
-igor
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any suggestions as to where I should look for clues?
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008
oses as well as to attempt to terminate the thread which
> caused the illegal access, and has no functional impact.
> Jun 6, 2008 10:58:23 AM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol destroy
> INFO: Stopping Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Va
; INFO: Illegal access: this web application instance has been stopped
>> already. Could not load org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SimpleLog.
>> The eventual following stack trace is caused by an error thrown for
>> debugging purposes as well as to attempt to terminate the thread which
>
the reason is that people run clusters behind a proxy. not all nodes
run out of the same context, so absolute links break, while relative
dont. there are a lot of threads on this. we didnt just decide
"relative urls look cooler cause we like the dots" and changed it...
-igor
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 a
wicket validators have been designed to work up to 90% of the time.
there is a heuristic that determines when the validator should stop
the form from submitting and when not. we find that validators that
work 100% of the time are just not as useful.
-igor
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Sergey P
what exactly is "heavy" ?
a validator accessing the database? why is that heavy?
it keeps a reference to the object that does the database check? why
is that heavy? there are plenty of things to make the lookup
lightweight such as wicket-spring and salve.
what exactly is too heavy about somethin
not without manually injecting the validator or making validate an
inner/anon class so it can access component's fields.
-igor
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:46 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can, however, pass in an object obtained via injection with the
> @SpringBean annotation.
>
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The lib directory in the QuickStart's WEB-INF contains:
>
>log4j-1.2.14.jar
>slf4j-api-1.4.2.jar
>slf4j-log4j12-1.4.2.jar
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Frid
so i tried to remove the generic type from component in
sandbox/ivaynberg/wicket-generics branch and ran into what i think is
a deal breaker for this design
class component {
public void setmodel(imodel model) {...}
public imodel getmodel();
}
that is all good until you want to have a generif
gt; wrote:
> Hi Igor and others,
>
> Great that you tried that out in practice!
>
> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>> class component {
>> public void setmodel(imodel model) {...}
>> public imodel getmodel();
>> }
>
> I was earli
wicket supports global javascript event handlers for this. either
search the list or look inside wicet-ajax.js, i cant recall them off
the top of my head.
-igor
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Martin Makundi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am trying to maneuvre a lightweight gmail-style bu
you should use wickettester to do this...that will create all the
proper threadlocal mocks you need.
-igor
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Fabien D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, thank you for tour help...
>
> This is a very strange behavior. I have tried to display this page, so I
> have
build the as a label and add it to the page. set
escapemodelstrings(false) on it and wicket wont escape any makrup.
-igor
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Stefan Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to use a JavaScript library that requires the body to be loaded.
> This can normally be don
o insert the Google
> Analytics javascript code right before my tag too.
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> build the as a label and add it to the page. set
>> escapemodelstrings(false) on it and wicket wont escape any makrup.
&
try applying this patch and see if it helps
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1667
-igor
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Stefan Fußenegger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am just analysing a heap dump (god bless the
> -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError flag) of a recent application cach
before you submit a jira ticket make sure it is also broken in the
wicket-1.3.x svn branch - which will be the 1.3.4 release - nothing
really mystical about it.
-igor
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Michael Mehrle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have not gone back to 1.3.2 yet - will give this a
pass the id into the createPanel method
-igor
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Peter Gardfjell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> a quick question. Is it possible to assign a new id to a Panel after it has
> been constructed?
> Something similar to:
>
> public Panel createPanel() {
>retu
it is possible. you can write a component that is only allowed to have
one child with any id using an IComponentResolver. is that a good
practice? if i were implementing your factory interface i would be
confused as to what id i should use since the panel takes it as a
constructor arg...so which wa
but it keeps failing. I'm using maven and am following the
> instructions (http://tinyurl.com/5dnxsf), but it keeps failing.
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 11:25 AM
>
paste your code
-igor
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Ricky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My page class consists of :
> 1.) Panel -A 2.) Panel - B.
>
> Just for FYI - Panel A has Refreshing View and a refreshing view nested
> within it (nested tables).
>
> When I do a refresh (F5 or simpl
a view code :
>addPerspectiveDataView(createPerspectiveDataView(BACKINGModelList));
>// in create Perspective Data View I have another refreshing view
>createNestedDataView(NestedBackingModelListForPerspective);
>
>
> Thanks
> Rick
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:20 PM,
of models. (calling business
> tier --> to hibernate).
>
> and then : * new RefreshingView(ID, MODELs){ };*
>
> I tried, changing above to : *new RefreshingView(ID, new Model(
> (Serializable) models) { };
> *But to no effect. =(
> *
> Rick.
> *
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008
i dont think cookie persistence is going to work for listviews out of
the box. the problem is that components inside repeaters do not have
stable component paths - and that is the key the cookie uses to store
values. so you will need to roll your own solution for this usecase.
-igor
On Tue, Jun 1
g cookie names different from the component IDs. It's just
> that the components that belong to a ListView are never even checked for
> loading.
>
> Where does Wicket discard the ListView components when visiting its child
> FormComponents?
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:14 PM, I
omponents that belong to a ListView are never even checked for
>> loading.
>>
>> Where does Wicket discard the ListView components when visiting its child
>> FormComponents?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
if someone can confirm that the patch works in a production env i will
be happy to commit it. i just havent had the time to test it myself
yet.
-igor
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:09 AM, Juha Alatalo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I run our profiling tests (version 1.3.3) using Application.
omponents are not visited.
>
> I'm using setReuseItems(true) -- I'm not sure why my ListView's children is
> null.
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> form components inside listview are visited.
>>
>>
Form.loadPersisitentFormComponentValues()
-igor
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:23 PM, nate roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry, which method do you mean?
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> what calls that m
it is a wiki
-igor
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:00 AM, Martin Makundi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tnx! Good point: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html
>
> I think this page should be strongly cross-referenced from markup
> inheritance tutorial ;) There's a lot of useful stuff
see ContextImage
-igor
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Patel, Sanjay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my images in the application are in webapp/image folder. How to get
> Context Path in wicket so I can prepend this path to display the image.
> I am looking for something like this.
>
> get
wrap the textfield in a fragment or a panel
-igor
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:39 PM, galbelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am creating a DefaultDataTable dynamically as I only know the number of
> columns at runtime. All is working nicely but I now need to have one of the
> columns contain a Te
sorry, havent had time to check out the source from svn yet
-igor
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, nitinkc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Igor,
> Any updates on this??
> thanks!
>
>
> nitinkc wrote:
>>
>> Here is the stack trace:
>> Root cause:java.lang.IllegalStateException: This behavior i
or just write your own model in an inner class...
-igor
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Either use a converter or create an adapter model that takes the
> propertymodel and retrieves the nested model object, and returns the
> appropriate string.
>
>
n still utilize the behavior whereas a
> component you cannot ;o)
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:29 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to get context path
>
> see ContextImag
indeed. i wouldnt mind if final was the default in java :)
-igor
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without the use of final wicket would not have made it this far.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Brill Pappin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i mean generally, for methods, fields, and func args :) most of this
stuff can stay final, but people dont bother doing it because its
extra typing.
-igor
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:38 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean like C++?
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Brill Pappin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is the most compelling argument I have ever heard (maintainability
> going forward).
> saying "i like this by default" as most have done is no argument at all :)
i suppose whenever you write any method that is consumed
use Select/SelectOption components rather then dropdownchoice
-igor
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> How can I style a certain option in a select list? I want to provide
> diffrent colors for main categories in a drop down list.
> --
> Vi
your textfield doesnt have a model
-igor
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:06 AM, galbelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, the Fragment example did help in that I have the table rendering
> properly. When I attempt to submit the form I get the following error:
>
> WicketMessage: Method onFormSubm
u, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:38 AM, James Carman
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> You mean like C++?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> indeed. i wouldnt mind if final was
no, you dont typically initialize the field. but you do want to
retrieve the result right? so you need to give the field a model.
wicket might not call model.getobject() on it, but it will call
model.setobject() when the form is submitted.
models do not contain data for markup, but for components.
x27;t work with final
>>> methods. Wicket components sometimes have overridable factory methods
>>> for child components. The decorator pattern could be very useful here,
>>> because you'd be able to decorate the original component with some extra
>>> f
forward to the delegate, only the message dispatch
itself. sure, technically you can do it even with a concrete class,
but you can also do a lot of other things that dont make sense.
-igor
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
&
looked over the article. what they do is a ui decorator, it is not the
software decorator pattern. there is no method delegation to the child
component. what they create is a composite, you can do the same thing
in wicket with a Border.
-igor
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Igor Vaynberg
should be fixed, noticed i fixed the version, it is now 1.3-snap
instead of 1.3.0-snap
-igor
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, nitinkc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Igor,
> Any updates on this??
> thanks!
>
>
> nitinkc wrote:
>>
>> Here is the stack trace:
>> Root cause:java.lang.IllegalStateExc
you have to give the mapping as a config param to the filter also, i
forget the exact name right now...
-igor
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wicket 1.3 is configured as a filter rather than as a servlet. The
> Quickstart shows a filter whose URL-P
see WicketSessionFilter
-igor
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have several Servlets and ServletFilters that run inside the same web
> application as my Wicket app. They've happily co-existed with Wicket until
> now, but now there is a requirement tha
ture" src="image1.png" alt="Picture"/ >
>
> where "image1.png" was set via AttributeModifyer) no longer appeared.
>
> That suggested to me that perhaps I wasn't supposed to change the
> of the filter. Should I submit this as a JIRA issu
you wanted access to raw http session from your wicket app, he wants
to access wicket session object from outside servlets. different
usecase.
-igor
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Brill Pappin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool, is that new?
>
> - Brill
>
> On 13-Jun
use statelessform
-igor
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:46 PM, nanotech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> In my application the Home Page of the class has the url that looks like
> this
>
> http://localhost:8080/app/?id=ABCXYZ
>
> This form has a textfield that I am pre-filling with value of
>applicationClassName
>
> com.mycompany.WicketApplication
>
>
>filterMappingUrlPattern
>/test/*
>
>
>
>
> wicket.myproject
>/test/*
>
he image; when both are set to
> "/test/*" then I don't see the image.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:10 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Wicket 1.2 -> 1.3 upgrade q
the query parameter will go away, you have to readd it yourself.
are you sure you are using the stateless form? doesnt look like it
from the url. what does the generated form action url look like?
-igor
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:24 PM, nanotech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I used StateLess for
r some other means. AOP is
> an option but feels hacky just to do this (pointcuts should generally match
> more than one joinpoint). Event listeners are another (but I won't dare
> begin that discussion again).
>
> Best regards,
> Matthijs
>
> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
&g
401 - 500 of 6158 matches
Mail list logo
