i think we should have qualified this rfi with a requirement that responders use 1.4 on a non-trivial project...these things only become apparent from real-world day-to-day usage. anything else is pretty much speculation.
-igor On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Mike Comb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well, in our case it would almost never be: >> >> MyComponent<MyModel> mycom = new MyComponent<MyModel>(); >> >> We don't have many of our own models, we use CompoundPropertyModel pretty >> much exclusively (wrapping DAOs or javabeans). So the verbosity doesn't >> benefit us much. Also, the vast majority of our components don't have a >> model. We generally have a page containing one or more forms with a >> CompoundPropModel on each form. Having generics (particularly if they are >> just something like <Void>) on every other object in the page is messy and >> confusing in my mind. > > Yep. > >> Telling people to use suppress annotations is not a good solution either, we >> want those warnings for other things in our code (Collections, etc). > > Yep. > > Eelco > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
