Hi all,
I've tested build 178.
- The editor allows syntax 1 and 2
- The added sub group is shown immediately.
Thanks!
mb
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@xwiki.org [mailto:users-boun...@xwiki.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Beetz
Sent: Montag, 8. Februar 2010 7:40
To: XWiki Users
Hi Michael,
On Feb 10, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Michael Beetz wrote:
Hi all,
I've tested build 178.
- The editor allows syntax 1 and 2
- The added sub group is shown immediately.
A big thank to you too for reporting those before we release the final 2.2
version!
Please continue testing since
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 09:40, Michael Beetz michael.be...@infor.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am running the actual XEM snapshot (159) and tested some of the previous
ones.
I am facing some (major) problems:
- The first line (the top menu line) shows the error message Error
number 4001
Good afternoon,
- All broken links are fixed, no velocity error anymore, the blog is shown
correct.
- The editor still offers the 1.0 syntax only
- An added subgroup isn't shown in the group editor immediately, even it has
been added.
Thanks
mb
-Original Message-
From:
Thomas,
Please see
http://n2.nabble.com/Problem-in-XEM-with-entity-references-refactoring-td4530770.html#a4530770
for details.
Thanks
mb
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@xwiki.org [mailto:users-boun...@xwiki.org] On Behalf Of
Thomas Mortagne
Sent: Montag, 8. Februar 2010 7:27
Hi all,
I am running the actual XEM snapshot (159) and tested some of the previous ones.
I am facing some (major) problems:
- The first line (the top menu line) shows the error message Error
number 4001 in 4: Error while parsing velocity page Wrapped Exception: Failed
to evaluate
Hi Michael,
On Feb 7, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Michael Beetz wrote:
Hi all,
I am running the actual XEM snapshot (159) and tested some of the previous
ones.
I am facing some (major) problems:
- The first line (the top menu line) shows the error message Error
number 4001 in 4:
Hi Vincent,
I've seen such a message - I am actually not able to reproduce it because I am
running on 2.1.1 - however I remember this error different object with the
same identifier
Kind regards
mb
What I found in the xwiki.log - however I couldn't associate an error ...
09:17:10,931
On Feb 7, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Michael Beetz wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I've seen such a message - I am actually not able to reproduce it because I
am running on 2.1.1 - however I remember this error different object with
the same identifier
ok, just FYI I've tracked the bug. It should be fixed