RE: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

From: juergen.l...@it.nrw.de [mailto:juergen.l...@it.nrw.de] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 5:29 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working We use

AW: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

Owen, what exactly does labelled mean? Can I think of it in our case as the request having a cookie JSESSIONID=numbers.tomcat1, i.e. a suffix matching one of the configured workers? If so, we completely misinterpreted the meaning of redirect. We are looking for a way to starve an instance:

[us...@httpd] Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL

Hello, I noticed the announcement of some vulnerabilities in OpenSSL: CVE-2009-0590, CVE-2009-0591 and CVE-2009-0789. Solution would be to upgrade to 0.9.8k. But I'm using the binary distribution of Apache (2.0.63 with OpenSSL 0.9.7m) and there is no newer one available. I don't want to switch

RE: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

-Original Message- From: juergen.l...@it.nrw.de [mailto:juergen.l...@it.nrw.de] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 9:52 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: AW: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working Owen, what exactly does labelled mean? containing an

Re: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

Boyle Owen wrote: -Original Message- From: juergen.l...@it.nrw.de [mailto:juergen.l...@it.nrw.de] If redirection in mod_proxy_balance does not work this way, what is the preferred way to smoothly fade out an instance? I don't know. Hi Juergen. You may want to have a look at

[us...@httpd] Apache 2 slow response to LanDesk Downloader

Hello, I've an Apache2 serving as file server for LanDesk Management suite. I'm having trouble with Apache when used by LanDesk client because of such a strange behaviour: the client makes tons of small requests for downloading a big file and the server, even if unloaded, respond too slow. The

[us...@httpd] Passing REMOTE_USER from reverse proxy to app server

Hi all httpd 2.2.11, prefork MPM, FreeBSD 7.2 I'm trying to pass the REMOTE_USER variable, as determined by the reverse proxy, to a backend application server. The main reason to do this is to offload authnz to the proxy, and to keep all this centralised in one place. The authn module that will

Re: [us...@httpd] Passing REMOTE_USER from reverse proxy to app server

Tom Evans wrote: [chop] That rewrite stuff happens before authentication. You would need to put your rewriterules inside a Location to activate them after it's happened. -- Nick Kew - The official User-To-User support forum

AW: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

Owen, thanks for your answers. The balancing stuff is documented very sparsely. Does anyone have an idea of what this feature is about? Seems to be some kind of dedicated failover strategy, but I can't imagine a use case for that. Cheers Jürgen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Boyle

[us...@httpd] Re: Passing REMOTE_USER from reverse proxy to app server

On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 14:42 +0100, Tom Evans wrote: Hi all httpd 2.2.11, prefork MPM, FreeBSD 7.2 I'm trying to pass the REMOTE_USER variable, as determined by the reverse proxy, to a backend application server. The main reason to do this is to offload authnz to the proxy, and to keep all

Re: [us...@httpd] Passing REMOTE_USER from reverse proxy to app server

On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 14:47 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: Tom Evans wrote: [chop] That rewrite stuff happens before authentication. You would need to put your rewriterules inside a Location to activate them after it's happened. Isn't that the point of %{LA-U:FOO}, to do a subrequest to get

AW: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

André, thanks for your suggestion. I was using mod_jk a while ago, but was persuaded to switch to mod_proxy. I'm going to build a test env with mod_jk by the end of this week and keep you informed. Cheers, Jürgen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]

Re: AW: [us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balance: route redirect not working

juergen.l...@it.nrw.de wrote: André, thanks for your suggestion. I was using mod_jk a while ago, but was persuaded to switch to mod_proxy. I'm going to build a test env with mod_jk by the end of this week and keep you informed. For additional info, I strongly recommend having a look at the

[us...@httpd] Redirecting htaccess over SSL, then back to port 80?

Hello, Is there a recommended solution for redirecting clients which need to authenticate for .htacess to a secure version of the URL, and then following succesful authentiction, redirecting them back to the normal (port 80) URL ? I've seen code like the following Directory

Re: [us...@httpd] Redirecting htaccess over SSL, then back to port 80?

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Paul Reillyparei...@tcd.ie wrote: I don't want to force all web access over HTTPS, just the .htaccess authentication. Assuming you're doing standard HTTP Authentication, it doesn't work that way. Once you get the login popup, every subsequent request by the