Re: [USRP-users] X310 with DPDK

2020-07-22 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
I have used DPDK with the X310. I don't recall specifically, but I'm pretty sure you either... a) don't specify mgmt_addr, or b) specify it the same as addr On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:12 PM Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > On 07/21/2020 10:53 AM, Carmichael,

Re: [USRP-users] X310 with DPDK

2020-07-21 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 07/21/2020 10:53 AM, Carmichael, Ryan via USRP-users wrote: On the DPDK page (https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_dpdk.html) the following statement is made: “Device discovery via DPDK is not currently implemented, so the device args |mgmt_addr|, |addr|, and |second_addr| (if applicable)

Re: [USRP-users] X310 with DPDK

2020-07-21 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 07/21/2020 10:53 AM, Carmichael, Ryan via USRP-users wrote: On the DPDK page (https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_dpdk.html) the following statement is made: “Device discovery via DPDK is not currently implemented, so the device args |mgmt_addr|, |addr|, and |second_addr| (if applicable)

[USRP-users] X310 with DPDK

2020-07-21 Thread Carmichael, Ryan via USRP-users
On the DPDK page (https://files.ettus.com/manual/page_dpdk.html) the following statement is made: "Device discovery via DPDK is not currently implemented, so the device args mgmt_addr, addr, and second_addr (if applicable) must all be specified at runtime. There is no mechanism for MPM's TCP/IP