? This is not strictly needed.
Oleg.
-
[PATCH] simplify do_signal_stop() utrace_report_jctl() interaction
do_signal_stop() can call utrace_report_jctl() before decrementing
-group_stop_count and setting TASK_STOPPED
Questions: should I send the change in signal.c to Andrew right now?
It can be applied separetely, it doesn't break utrace_report_jctl().
Yes, send it now. It might be best just to send a replacement
for signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch that rolls this in.
I wouldn't mention
On 07/28, Roland McGrath wrote:
Questions: should I send the change in signal.c to Andrew right now?
It can be applied separetely, it doesn't break utrace_report_jctl().
Yes, send it now.
OK, will do
It might be best just to send a replacement
for
Roland, I'd prefer to send this change separately. Otherwise it will
be really hard to review the unified patch.
Do it however you think is best for getting all the generic signal.c and
tracehook.h bits merged ASAP.
And I think this will complicate its way to Linus's tree. I _think_
that
with this change... I don't know how it should be merged.
Probably the change in signal.c should be sent separately, but this breaks
-mm tree.
--
[PATCH] simplify do_signal_stop() utrace_report_jctl() interaction
Assuming you agree with this change... I don't know how it should be merged.
Probably the change in signal.c should be sent separately, but this breaks
-mm tree.
The relevant -mm differences are just in one patch that folds finish_stop
into do_signal_stop, right? If I can apply just that one
On 07/27, Roland McGrath wrote:
Assuming you agree with this change... I don't know how it should be merged.
Probably the change in signal.c should be sent separately, but this breaks
-mm tree.
The relevant -mm differences are just in one patch that folds finish_stop
into do_signal_stop,
Ah. I forgot signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch is still pending in
-mm.
Perhaps we should just rejigger all these together into one new patch (or
two, whatever) before akpm submits any of them.
Or you can just merge these 2 patches, perhaps this would be better.
As long as we have
Roland, I think it better to change tracehook definition more, please
see below.
I don't really object to this in principle. But this touches signal.c a
lot more in less obviously-trivial ways than my tracehook patch. That is
more of an issue at the outset than some extra fiddling in the
?
-
[PATCH] simplify do_signal_stop() utrace_report_jctl() interaction
do_signal_stop() can call utrace_report_jctl() before decrementing
-group_stop_count and setting TASK_STOPPED/SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED.
This allow to greatly simplify utrace_report_jctl() and avoid playing
with group-stop
10 matches
Mail list logo
