Building in VS2013 fails for cctest project with the following warnings
treated as error.
8test-cpu-profiler.cc(57): error C2220: warning treated as error - no
'object' file generated
8test-cpu-profiler.cc(57): warning C4316:
'v8::internal::ProfilerEventsProcessor' : object allocated on the
Well you obviously need to catch the error raised on the javascript side
and not on the c++ side
try {
document.write('foo');
} catch (e) {
//handle error
} finally {
//cleanup
}
var str = 'hello' + 'world';
On Friday, November 8, 2013 9:56:23 AM UTC+2, Michael demiGod wrote:
script:
1
I think what you need is: ObjectTemplate::SetIndexedPropertyHandler
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 8:39:54 PM UTC+2, Flying Jester wrote:
Let's say I have an object on the C++ side that is wrapped for use in JS.
It has several member functions attached to its prototype. Is there a way
to
Okay, after a lot of trial and error, i think i got the hang of it... Had
to use both Locker and Unlocker to get it to work.
On Thursday, October 10, 2013 5:28:52 PM UTC+3, ioannis wrote:
Well, you make it sound soo easy ...
I have read the documentation in v8.h and how it was done in d8.cc
If you are using the API to build your object then you can try the following:
LocalFunctionTemplate
func_templ(FunctionTemplate::New());func_templ-SetClassName(String::NewSymbol(ClassName));LocalObjectTemplate
obj_templ = func_templ-InstanceTemplate();
On Friday, October 11, 2013 5:04:36
Well, you make it sound soo easy ...
I have read the documentation in v8.h and how it was done in d8.cc but i
still cant get ti to work.
On Wednesday, October 9, 2013 11:37:50 AM UTC+3, Ben Noordhuis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:15 AM, ioannis ioan...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Ok
Persistent is defined by default with NonCopyablePersistentTraits which means
that it cannot be used in structs that allow copy/assignment operations.
You can explicitly define Persistent with CopyablePersistentTraits in order to
allow copy/assignment operations.
I use the following type
Ok, so i'm going nuts here, v8 v.
I have a worker thread that is executed based on events raised from my object.
The thread uses the *same* isolate and context from the JS object
So the thread is initiated like below and is working.
Isolate* isolate = object_-isolate_;Isolate::Scope
As far as i understand *correct me if i'am wrong* you cannot have an object
member to act as both a property (using getter/setter) and a calling
function.
It should be one of the two.
So i guess you will need an object member, a property to get/set the update
value string and another object
Ah yes you are right, i didn't read the post to its entirety, i just
assumed that you were setting the value to a string for some unknown reason
:) ...
Sorry, apologies for the confusion.
On Sunday, October 6, 2013 11:43:21 PM UTC+3, James Lomax wrote:
You can, the problem was just that I was
Thanks for the pointers.
This would mean that i need to keep a record of all the objects that have
been created dynamically and rebuild the relationships on every GC.
Isn't this a bit expensive ?
I was thinking something simpler by setting/removing the Weak flag on the
parent object depending
So i'm going to piggyback this post for some additional questions...
1) Is it safe to call v8::V8::IdleNotification() within a WeakCallback() to
scavenge additional objects that have been set as weak in WeakCallback() ?
I guess not.. i get a crash.
2) Also, lets say within a function scope if
Noordhuis wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:40 PM, ioannis ioan...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
So i'm going to piggyback this post for some additional questions...
1) Is it safe to call v8::V8::IdleNotification() within a WeakCallback()
to
scavenge additional objects that have been
So with the resent changes to Persistent how can we store a series of
PersistentFunction handles to an STL container like map ?
--
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Shouldn't the use of Handle and Local be interchangeable ?
Has it been decided which of the two will be depreciated in the end ?
It seems that we cannot assign a Handle value to the Eternal and we need
to use Local instead ...
--
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
So if i understand correctly, in order to obtain the underlying value of a
BooleanObject, i need to first cast the Value to BooleanObject and then call
BooleanValue()
Do we need to perform the same casting from Value to NumberObject and
StringObject to correctly obtain the underlying value ?
I was wandering why the following BooleanValue() statements always return
true, shouldn't the first one return false ?
Also why both IsTrue() and IsFalse() return false in the statements below ?
Is there a bug or am i missing something here ?
bool test0 =
Ok, so I have the following code.
The function Delete is a function property of the Point object, to ensure
proper destruction of the c++ object.
At point (2) i am checking whether the js variable is a global variable and
set the value to Null().
Is there a way to set a local function scope js
Thank you for the reply.
Basically what I want to achieve is the following.
Consider this js example
After my ReleaseObject() function is called x = is still a point object
At the second print(x) i would like my variable to be null, or report as
null without explicitly setting it to null with
I have tried the above but i don;t think that it works correctly.
Have you found another way to set an Object to null ?
On Friday, 8 April 2011 19:29:04 UTC+3, mcot wrote:
I think I solved my problem:
v8::HandleScope hndl_scope;
...
...
v8::Handlev8::Object obj =
20 matches
Mail list logo
