On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 14:24 +0200, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
> 2009/6/27 Yu Feng :
> > On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 08:03 +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> >>
> >> 4. Port Tomboy as a show-case project port
> >>
> >
> > 4 seems to be very fun; how large is the codebase of tomboy?
> >
> > BTW: What is the lar
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 01:24 +0400, Кутейников Дмитрий wrote:
> It is some sort of a bug (or a feature). Vala inserts g_object_ref in
> generated C-code after myList.prepend(myWidget); but it doesn't
> decrease ref_counter after remove. The only way is to use
> g_object_unref manually.
What you sai
> Nonetheless I still think if VALA needs bigger, live projects to
> increase the level awareness which it deserves. At least among the
> open-source vala projects tracked by ohloh, I don't see any of them a
> critical application(by critical I mean a real develop team, active
> development and lar
* Yu Feng wrote, On 01/07/09 08:38:
> On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 14:24 +0200, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
>
>> 2009/6/27 Yu Feng :
>>
>>> On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 08:03 +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
>>>
4. Port Tomboy as a show-case project port
>>> 4 seems to be very fu
* Yu Feng wrote, On 01/07/09 08:50:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 01:24 +0400, Кутейников Дмитрий wrote:
>
>> It is some sort of a bug (or a feature). Vala inserts g_object_ref in
>> generated C-code after myList.prepend(myWidget); but it doesn't
>> decrease ref_counter after remove. The only way is t
Dne 1. červenec 2009 9:38 Yu Feng napsal(a):
>
> I agree with you. Porting for the porting's sake is nothing but harmful.
>
> Nonetheless I still think if VALA needs bigger, live projects to
> increase the level awareness which it deserves.
Yes, it definitely does. But it also needs to be somethi
2009/7/1 Sam Liddicott :
> I think you are right, and that the Vala project must be kept unconnected
> from the politics this struggle; but when the women get the bandages and
> basins of water ready, it is not to join in the fight, but to be prepared
> for the inevitable outcome.
That would sugge
Hello,
I'm currently playing with Gtk, GStreamer and vala and I found some issues
(I think) in the binding:
For example, considering these two methods:
http://valadoc.org/?pkg=gstreamer-0.10&element=Gst.XML.get_element
http://valadoc.org/?pkg=gstreamer-0.10&element=Gst.XML.parse_file
They take a
Hello. In Vala, derived class and implemented interfaces are defined
the same say, like in C#. As this way there is no syntactical
difference, C# convention states that interface names always start
with "I". For example, interface Foo would have name IFoo in C#.
However, there is no such convention
