Yesterday Pablo Sanchez wrote:
> [ Comments below, in line ]
>
> On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 3:01 pm, Pablo Sanchez penned
> about "Re: [vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
>
> >
> > No matter, only 64-bit is available. I'll download and try to
> > create the VM.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 05:31:56PM -0500, Pablo Sanchez wrote:
> No-go, I couldn't create the VM due to my Host O/S being 32-bit.
> Sorry man.
I definitely stand to be corrected, but from the bit I think I know,
you should be able to run a 64-bit gues
[ Comments below, in line ]
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 3:01 pm, Pablo Sanchez penned
about "Re: [vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
>
> No matter, only 64-bit is available. I'll download and try to
> create the VM. :)
Hi Tobi,
No-go, I couldn't create the VM
Can someone please help me with my audio problem in my Ubuntu 9.10 machine?
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:21 PM, n179911 wrote:
> I have installed linux guest addition by doing this:
>
> open an ubuntu terminal and
>
> $ cd /media/cdrom0
> $ sudo ./VBoxLinuxAdditions-x86.run
> [sudo] password for sc
[ Comments below, in line ]
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 2:52 pm, Pablo Sanchez penned
about "Re: [vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
> [ Comments below, in line ]
>
> On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 2:44 pm, Tobias Oetiker penned
> about "Re: [vbox-users] vbox pe
[ Comments below, in line ]
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 2:44 pm, Tobias Oetiker penned
about "Re: [vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
> Hi Pablo,
Hi Tobi,
> cool ... please make sure to use the 64bit version ... this might
> affect the system ...
Hmmm, I'm runn
Hi Pablo,
Today Pablo Sanchez wrote:
> [ Comments below, in line ]
>
> On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 11:34 am, Tobias Oetiker penned
> about "Re: [vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
>
> > [ snipped ]
>
> Hi Tobi,
>
> I see I can download Windows 2008 on a trial basi
Hi,
I exported a VM created from a host running on Windows XP. When I try to import
this VM on a host running Vista, I get the following error.
Cannot unregister the machine 'My machine name' because it has 2 medium
attachments.
I can successfully import the same VM on my original XP machine
Hi all
Anyone have any tips on backing up Virtualbox clients
My techlab is
Two Ubuntu 9.10 64bit servers, various windows clients
All the VDI's are on a Cifs (samba) server
I have Bacula based backup server
One of the issues is I would like to backup the clients when they up and
running
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Pablo Sanchez wrote:
> [ Comments below, in line ]
>
> On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 11:34 am, Tobias Oetiker penned
> about "Re: [vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
>
>> [ snipped ]
>
> Hi Tobi,
>
> I see I can download Windows 2008 o
[ Comments below, in line ]
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 11:34 am, Tobias Oetiker penned
about "Re: [vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
> [ snipped ]
Hi Tobi,
I see I can download Windows 2008 on a trial basis (180 days). I'll
sign up and download it and prepare
[ Comments below, in line ]
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 11:34 am, Tobias Oetiker penned
about "Re: [vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
> Hi Pablo,
Hi Tobi,
> the disk is a raid6 system with ext3 ... its performance is not the
> issue for our application ...
'k
Hi Pablo,
Today Pablo Sanchez wrote:
> [ Comments below, in line ]
>
> On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 11:13 am, Tobias Oetiker penned
> about "Re: [vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
>
> > Hi Pablo,
>
> Hi Tobi,
>
> > > Let me know if you'd like additional informatio
[ Comments below, in line ]
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 11:13 am, Tobias Oetiker penned
about "Re: [vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
> Hi Pablo,
Hi Tobi,
> > Let me know if you'd like additional information.
>
> I asume your system is running without 'slowdow
Hi Pablo,
Today Pablo Sanchez wrote:
> [ Comments below, in line ]
>
> On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 5:33 am, Tobias Oetiker penned
> about "[vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
>
> > I got me an evaluation copy of
> >
> >PassMark (http://www.passmark.com/product
[ Comments below, in line ]
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 at 5:33 am, Tobias Oetiker penned
about "[vbox-users] vbox performance issues verified with benchmarking"
> I got me an evaluation copy of
>
>PassMark (http://www.passmark.com/products/pt.htm)
>
> and ran it on virtualbox 3.0.12 (2 co
>
>
>>
>> have you tried the benchmark ?
>>
> i have tried my own benchmarks only, what have you executed exactly?
>
found it, checkin' it
>
>
>>
>> cheers
>> tobi
>>
>>
>> Today István wrote:
>>
>> > hi,
>> >
>> > kernel: Linux 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Dec 9 10:46:22 EST
>> 2009
>> >
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> Hi István,
>
> how have you configured your virtual machine ?
>
http://pastie.org/768837
> how ist your host kernel configured ?
>
stock fedora
>
> have you tried the benchmark ?
>
i have tried my own benchmarks only, what have you execu
Hi István,
how have you configured your virtual machine ?
how ist your host kernel configured ?
have you tried the benchmark ?
cheers
tobi
Today István wrote:
> hi,
>
> kernel: Linux 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Dec 9 10:46:22 EST 2009
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> userland: Fedo
hi,
kernel: Linux 2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Dec 9 10:46:22 EST 2009
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
userland: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)
virtualbox: VirtualBox-3.1-3.1.2_56127_fedora12-1.x86_64
hw:http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/x2100/specs.xml
1 CPU, 2 core, 8G ram, 2x1T mirror
w
Hi Istvan,
Today István wrote:
> interesting
>
> i have 2 win2k8 virts on 3.1.2(64) and the performance(measured by sql
> queries) is around the third of the native(non-virt) generally, i am
> wondering if this is acceptable
>
> i could rerun your tests if you wish because it is a test system at
interesting
i have 2 win2k8 virts on 3.1.2(64) and the performance(measured by sql
queries) is around the third of the native(non-virt) generally, i am
wondering if this is acceptable
i could rerun your tests if you wish because it is a test system at the
moment
regards,
Istvan
On Wed, Ja
Hi Alexey,
Today Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> Does it happen with UP (1 vCPU) guest too ?
yes ... although I have not tested this with 3.0.12 (only with
3.1.2) ... unfortunately this is a production system so the testing
possibilities are rather limited and the tension is rather high ...
since the
Does it happen with UP (1 vCPU) guest too ?
--
-Alexey Eromenko "Technologov"
___
vbox-users mailing list
vbox-users@virtualbox.org
http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
Experts,
We have been fighting with windows 2k8 64bit guest performance on
virtual box linux host for about a week now. The behaviour we see
is that the guest system slows down dramatically after running for
a few hours.
We tried kernel upgrades on the host (up to 2.6.32.2 with 250 Hz
and preempt
25 matches
Mail list logo