[snip]
Tom:
At the very least, vpopmaild discussion should be on vpopmail-devel
instead of the vchkpw list. I am sure that there are others, like me,
who aren't interested in following the early stages of development and
would prefer not to receive 20-30 messages a day discussing it.
[snip]
May
Guys,
I am in hospital at the moment - one of the muscles of my left leg refused
to work and the doctors look for the reason.
I could not read all posts - I would just like to tell you that two more
people are interested in this daemon - and they want to write it - so it
seems that this project
Hello everybody,
Sorry for cross posting if you get this message two or three times. This is a
milestone message and I will not make it a practice.
First, thank you everybody who wrote back (all in the CC:). Your comments were great
and lead to much better visibility in the situation php
Hello everybody,
As it seems that the daemon idea prevails - what about a 'home' for the daemon?
When I spoke to Boian Bonev (one of the authors of the php vpopmail extension) he was
absolutely for the daemon idea, but he said that it is very important to decide about
its home -
Is it going
[snip]
Ken Jones wrote:
That sounds good. Of course as a C programmer I'd prefer it be
written in C linking in the vpopmail API. I'd like to take a swing
at building it in C over the weekend. vmailmgr has something
like this already, including a php module to talk to it. Perhaps
we can re-use
[snip]
Marcin Soltysiak:
Ken:
That sounds good. Of course as a C programmer I'd prefer it be
written in C linking in the vpopmail API. I'd like to take a swing
at building it in C over the weekend. vmailmgr has something
like this already, including a php module to talk to it. Perhaps
we
[snip]
X-Istence:
why? We could talk to it using normal sockets. I dont see why it would
require a special API to talk to a normal deamon on a TCP/IP. Even Unix
sockets.
[snip]
I heard this idea several times and I think I like it.
[snip]
Ken Jones
On Friday 02 April 2004 2:32 pm, Iavor Raytchev wrote:
Would be best to open a Sourceforge.net project and open a wiki for an easy
white board?
I'd like to keep it in the vpopmail project. The daemon could be part of
the regular code and the php client module could be part
[snip]
Rick Macdougall:
Ken Jones wrote:
I'd like to keep it in the vpopmail project. The daemon could be part of
the regular code and the php client module could be part of contrib?
I really like the idea of a wiki, too bad we don't have one for vpopmail.
Hi,
My only problem with that
Hello,
I posted here a couple of days ago a note about the php vpopmail extension
and I got in touch with Rick Widmer who has done some progress on it. As I
wrote then - we want to write high level php/Smarty GUI for vpopmail
management module.
The main stumbling block seems the need to run
Hello,
I am new to the list.
The last weeks I tried to research on php based vpopmail manager. The nearest I found
were some vpopmail php extensions in PECL that are v. 0.2 (beta).
We have a web publishing software in php/Smarty/PostgreSQL and we run
qmail/vpopmail/ezmil. What we are looking
a few new functions, and allows most of QmailAdmin's
functionality, if you are willing to configure your web server to run as
the vpopmail user.
If you want to look at what I've done with pMailAdmin, let me know off
list, and I'll send you a copy.
Rick Widmer
Iavor Raytchev wrote:
Hello,
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
