Hi troll,
At 21:39 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello Erwin,
>
>Friday, May 21, 2004, 7:37:15 PM, you wrote:
>EH> Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de/
>EH> Wiener Weg 8, 50858 Cologne | T: +49 221 484 4923 | F: ...24
>
>To be rude and without respect, this was the speciality of You
dary="_=_NextPart_001_01C43F70.5399BB8C"
NH> X-Spam-Score: -98.048 Required 6
NH> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37
NH> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?
NH> X-Fetchmail-Warning: recipient address [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't match any local
name
NH> On Fr
Title: Re: Re[2]: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 14:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Nick,
>
> Friday, May 21, 2004, 8:02:19 PM, you wrote:
>
>
> NH>
>
> Privacy issues are hot topic, You known. If You known, some
> 'sensiti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
> I do not have an open relay. I am trying to setup SMTP Auth. It is not
> working.. When users try to auth, it just keeps asking for username
> password over and over. Never sends.
How are they authentication? with [EMAIL PROTECT
PD> Ahhh...yes! A flame war...always nice :)
I quote from the one who has bringing 'the gas': EH> You are joking, troll
Well, I did't start. This list is to help people. It's not about to be picky
or to be arrogant, if someone share another view, he has the right to put his vision
forward and to
Hello Patrick,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 9:34:30 PM, you wrote:
PD> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PD> Hello Erwin,
PD> Friday, May 21, 2004, 7:37:15 PM, you wrote:
EH>> Hi,
EH>> At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
PD> Hello Erwin,
PD> Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote:
EH>> Hi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Erwin,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 7:37:15 PM, you wrote:
EH> Hi,
EH> At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
Hello Erwin,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote:
EH> Hi,
EH> At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
Hello Erwin,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 7:37:15 PM, you wrote:
EH> Hi,
EH> At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
>>Hello Erwin,
>>
>>Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>EH> Hi,
>>
>>EH> At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
Hello blist,
>>
In the OLD days, people were happy wit
Hello Nick,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 8:02:19 PM, you wrote:
NH> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Hello Jeremy,
>>
>>Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:20:40 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>JK> On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
EH> This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type "plain" and
Title: Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOWTO?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hello Jeremy,
>
>Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:20:40 PM, you wrote:
>
>JK> On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>>EH> This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type &
Hi,
At 17:21 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello Erwin,
>
>Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote:
>
>EH> Hi,
>
>EH> At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
>>>Hello blist,
>>>
>
>>>In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
>>>security as SMTP after POP, because with SM
Hello Jeremy,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:20:40 PM, you wrote:
JK> On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> EH> This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type "plain" and "login".
>> EH> With CRAM-MD5 its quite save.
>> Yes, it's 'quite' safe, but You still reveal Your e-mailad
On Friday 21 May 2004 10:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> EH> This is only true for SMTP Authentication of type "plain" and "login".
> EH> With CRAM-MD5 its quite save.
> Yes, it's 'quite' safe, but You still reveal Your e-mailadress.
> If there are many hops between Your workstation and the smtp
Hello Erwin,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 5:14:30 PM, you wrote:
EH> Hi,
EH> At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
>>Hello blist,
>>
>>In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
>>security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
>>e-mailadress and Your passwo
On Friday 21 May 2004 09:11 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
> >> security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
> >> e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet.
> JKister> Are you insin
On Thursday 20 May 2004 09:24 pm, Brooks Roy wrote:
> I have put in the patch as described in the contrib README and changed
> it to be /bin/checkpassword instead of vchkpw and I still have the same
> senario.
/bin/checkpassword generally needs to be run as root to authenticate users.
More than
Hi,
At 11:41 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello blist,
>
>In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
>security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
>e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet.
>When a man-in-the-middle catch thi
Hello Jeremy,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 3:47:18 PM, you wrote:
JK> On Friday, May 21, 2004 5:41 AM, DEBO Jurgen E. G. wrote:
>> In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
>> security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
>> e-mailadress and Your password
On Friday, May 21, 2004 5:41 AM, DEBO Jurgen E. G. wrote:
> In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
> security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
> e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet.
Are you insinuating that this is
Hello blist,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 2:00:08 AM, you wrote:
b> I am installing vchkpw + SMTP AUTH + qmail. I have installed qmail with
b> this patch:
b>qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31 from
b> http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
b> Here is my run tcpserver script for
I do not have an open relay. I am trying to setup SMTP Auth. It is not
working.. When users try to auth, it just keeps asking for username
password over and over. Never sends.
X-Istence wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
I have put in the patch as descri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
> I have put in the patch as described in the contrib README and changed
> it to be /bin/checkpassword instead of vchkpw and I still have the
> same senario.
What does your data.cdb or smtp.cdb look like that gets created from a file
I have put in the patch as described in the contrib README and changed
it to be /bin/checkpassword instead of vchkpw and I still have the same
senario.
X-Istence wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
So use the patch from the vpopmail contrib directory WITHOUT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brooks Roy wrote:
> So use the patch from the vpopmail contrib directory WITHOUT the
> hostname in the run script for tcpserver?
>
> Wont this make the server an open relay?
No, cause that patch doesnt require a hostname on purpose, as to many
poeple
So use the patch from the vpopmail contrib directory WITHOUT the
hostname in the run script for tcpserver?
Wont this make the server an open relay?
X-Istence wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My apologies, the solution i provided *WILL* not work. Considering the
code still cont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My apologies, the solution i provided *WILL* not work. Considering the
code still contains the hostname stuff.
What i suggest is you grab the patch from the vpopmail contrib
directory, it contains a copy that *will* work.
X-Istence
-BEGIN PGP SI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> On Thursday 20 May 2004 07:00 pm, blist wrote:
>>Here is my run tcpserver script for qmail-smtpd:
>>
>>exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1000 \
>>/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -R -l "$LOCAL" -x \
>>/usr/local/vpopmail/etc/tc
r upbuf[128];
- int authd = 0;
int authgetl(void) {
int i;
--- 431,436
blist wrote:
I am installing vchkpw + SMTP AUTH + qmail. I have installed qmail
with this patch:
qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31 from
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
Here is my run tcpserver script
Jeremy,
QMAILDUID = vpopmail
I know if i take out the domain its open :(.. That is the only thing so
far that works.. I am at loss what I did wrong. Been googling all night :)
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Thursday 20 May 2004 07:00 pm, blist wrote:
I am installing vchkpw + SMTP AUTH + qmail
On Thursday 20 May 2004 07:00 pm, blist wrote:
> I am installing vchkpw + SMTP AUTH + qmail. I have installed qmail with
> this patch:
>qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31 from
> http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
>
> Here is my run tcpserver script for qmail-smtpd:
&
I am installing vchkpw + SMTP AUTH + qmail. I have installed qmail with
this patch:
qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31 from
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/
Here is my run tcpserver script for qmail-smtpd:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1000 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -R
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 11:51 am, cade dan wrote:
> try this:
>
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 192.168.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> :deny,SMTPAUTH=""
you mean:
:allow,SMTPAUTH=""
:deny will drop the connection
http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcprules.html
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrat
try this:
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""192.168.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="":deny,SMTPAUTH=""signo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hello, i ve 2 problemsfirst:I've installed qmail 1.03 with qmail-smtpd-auth-043. Now the smth auth work fine but ifi try to send an email (with Mozilla) without smpt authentication
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 07:42 am, signo wrote:
> last problem:
>
> if i use the line (in /etc/tcp.smtp)
>
> :allow,RELAYCLIENT="",REQUIREAUTH=""
bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad idea. Luckily you got bit by the patch
and it didn't allow you to make yourself an open relay
last problem:
if i use the line (in /etc/tcp.smtp)
:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",REQUIREAUTH=""
nobody can send me email !!
the sender receive the message:
Your message has encountered delivery problems
to the following recipient(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery failed
535 authentication failed (#5.
Thanks..it work fine
signo
Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
At 11:30 19.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
...i must recompile qmail with SPAMCONTROL and cmd5checkpw (now i use
vchkpw) ??
with my patch (qmail-smtpd-auth-043) i can't do anything ??
SPAMCONTROL is a superset
Hi,
At 11:30 19.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
>...i must recompile qmail with SPAMCONTROL and cmd5checkpw (now i use
>vchkpw) ??
>
> with my patch (qmail-smtpd-auth-043) i can't do anything ??
SPAMCONTROL is a superset of qmail-smtpd-auth.
Please read the enclosed documentations.
regards.
--eh.
...i must recompile qmail with SPAMCONTROL and cmd5checkpw (now i use
vchkpw) ??
with my patch (qmail-smtpd-auth-043) i can't do anything ??
thanks
signo
Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
At 10:49 19.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
Erwin Hoffmann wrote:Hi, At 09:46 19.05.04 +0200, sig
Hi,
At 10:49 19.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
>Erwin Hoffmann wrote:Hi, At 09:46 19.05.04 +0200, signo wrote:
> hello, i ve 2 problems first: I've installed qmail 1.03 with
>qmail-smtpd-auth-043. Now the smth auth work fine but if i try to send an
>email (with Mozilla) without sm
Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
At 09:46 19.05.04 +0200, signo wrote:
hello, i ve 2 problems
first:
I've installed qmail 1.03 with qmail-smtpd-auth-043. Now the smth auth
work fine but if
i try to send an email (with Mozilla) without smpt authentication set it
work??!!!??
Hi,
At 09:46 19.05.04 +0200, signo wrote:
>hello, i ve 2 problems
>
>first:
>I've installed qmail 1.03 with qmail-smtpd-auth-043. Now the smth auth
>work fine but if
>i try to send an email (with Mozilla) without smpt authentication set it
>work??!!!??
Hm. Could you please explain that in m
hello, i ve 2 problems
first:
I've installed qmail 1.03 with qmail-smtpd-auth-043. Now the smth auth
work fine but if
i try to send an email (with Mozilla) without smpt authentication set it
work??!!!??
can you tell me why??
i've modifiey my tcp.smtp file like that:
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
On Monday 26 April 2004 02:59 am, signo wrote:
> i'm feel very stupid !!! it does not work!!
>
> VPOPUID=`id -g vpopmail`
> VPOPGID=`id -g vpopmail`
> LOCAL=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/me`
> MAXSMTPD=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
>
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 /usr/
IT'S WORK THANKS TO ALL !!!
signo
signo wrote:
Jeremy Kister wrote:
On Monday, April 26, 2004 4:00 AM, signo wrote:
i'm feel very stupid !!! it does not work!!
VPOPUID=`id -g vpopmail`
well, that should be VPOPUID=`id -u vpopmail`
OK
ar
Jeremy Kister wrote:
On Monday, April 26, 2004 4:00 AM, signo wrote:
i'm feel very stupid !!! it does not work!!
VPOPUID=`id -g vpopmail`
well, that should be VPOPUID=`id -u vpopmail`
OK
are you running Solaris? if so, change
VPOPUID=`id -u vpopmail` to VPOPUID
yes it's true, but the result is always the same :-(
Matthias Grimm wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
signo wrote:
| i'm feel very stupid !!! it does not work!!
|
| VPOPUID=`id -g vpopmail`
shouldn't it be
VPOPUID=`id -u vpopmail`?
| VPOPGID=`id -g vpopmail`
| LOCAL=`head -1 /v
On Monday, April 26, 2004 4:00 AM, signo wrote:
> i'm feel very stupid !!! it does not work!!
>
> VPOPUID=`id -g vpopmail`
well, that should be VPOPUID=`id -u vpopmail`
are you running Solaris? if so, change
VPOPUID=`id -u vpopmail` to VPOPUID=`/usr/xpg4/bin/id -u vpopmail`
VPOPGID=`id -g vpopma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
signo wrote:
| i'm feel very stupid !!! it does not work!!
|
| VPOPUID=`id -g vpopmail`
shouldn't it be
VPOPUID=`id -u vpopmail`?
| VPOPGID=`id -g vpopmail`
| LOCAL=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/me`
M!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (
i'm feel very stupid !!! it does not work!!
VPOPUID=`id -g vpopmail`
VPOPGID=`id -g vpopmail`
LOCAL=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/me`
MAXSMTPD=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R
-l "$LOCAL" -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cd
On Monday, April 26, 2004 3:22 AM, I wrote:
> your run script is incorrect for this patch. try:
also, if you really have:
LOCAL=``
that's wrong too.
LOCAL=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/me`
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net/
On Monday, April 26, 2004 3:31 AM, signo wrote:
> i've tried the qmail-smtpd-auth-043_tgz.bin patch but the result is always
the same:
>
> 454 oops, unable to write pipe and I can't auth (#4.3.0)
your run script is incorrect for this patch. try:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 /usr/local/
hello,
i've tried the qmail-smtpd-auth-043_tgz.bin patch but the result is
always the same:
454 oops, unable to write pipe and I can't auth (#4.3.0)
#!/bin/sh
VPOPUID=`id -u vpopmail`
VPOPGID=`id -g vpopmail`
LOCAL=``
MAXSMTPD=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
if [ -z "$
On Apr 22, 2004, at 11:43 PM, signo wrote:
where can i found a new one?
The latest SMTP AUTH patch is included in the contrib directory of
vpopmail 5.4.0 and later.
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
Info on the Sniffter
where can i found a new one?
thanks
signo
Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
At 16:29 22.04.04 +0200, signo wrote:
hello i've a problem with smtp auth
when i try to send an email i have always the message:
454 oops, unable to write pipe and I can't auth (#4.3.0)
SW:
qmail: 1.3
smtp
Hi,
At 16:29 22.04.04 +0200, signo wrote:
>hello i've a problem with smtp auth
>
> when i try to send an email i have always the message:
> 454 oops, unable to write pipe and I can't auth (#4.3.0)
>
> SW:
> qmail: 1.3
> smtp-auth: qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31
>
> telnet on port 25
>
> Escape char
hello i've a problem with smtp auth
when i try to send an email i have always the message:
454 oops, unable to write pipe and I can't auth (#4.3.0)
SW:
qmail: 1.3
smtp-auth: qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31
telnet on port 25
Escape character is '^]'.
ehlo
220 -=NO UNSOLICITED BULK E-MAIL=- ESMTP
250-
hello,
l1:~ # find / -name true
/bin/true
and in /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current i don't have any error!!
I don't understand why pop3d can authenticate with mysql while smtpd no!
via squirrelmail i have this error:
Server replied: 454 oops, unable to write pipe and I can't auth
signo
Erwin Hoffm
Hi,
At 10:48 30.03.04 -0500, Joel Newkirk wrote:
>Is there any way to set up SMTP-Auth, while still allowing pop-b4-smtp?
Yes.
>So far when I've rebuilt the system with SMTP-Auth patching, it will
>ONLY accept SMTP-Auth to allow relaying... :(
You have to write a wrapper script around qmail-sm
Hi,
At 16:12 30.03.04 +0200, signo wrote:
>hello, i've problems with smtp-auth, when i try to send email from a
>client the server ask always for a password (but the passwd is ok)
>
>please help me!!
>
>thanks
>
>signo
>
>situation:
>
>qmail: qmail-1.03
>vpopmail: 5.3.28
>smtp-auth patch on qmail
3:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH with vchkpw
HI,
At 23:19 29.03.04 -0500, you wrote:
>I seem to be having a hard time getting smpt auth to work, when ever I
>try to send e-mail without authentication enabled it goes through fine.
>My setup is qmail+vpopmail+mys
Is there any way to set up SMTP-Auth, while still allowing pop-b4-smtp?
So far when I've rebuilt the system with SMTP-Auth patching, it will
ONLY accept SMTP-Auth to allow relaying... :(
We have several thousand clients set up on pop-b4-smtp, and forcing a
mass migration to smtp-auth is out of th
hello, i've problems with smtp-auth, when i try to send email from a
client the server ask always for a password (but the passwd is ok)
please help me!!
thanks
signo
situation:
qmail: qmail-1.03
vpopmail: 5.3.28
smtp-auth patch on qmail: qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2
(http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/au
gt;From: Erwin Hoffmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 8:22 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH with vchkpw
>
>Hi Jeremy,
>
>
>At 15:10 28.03.04 -0600, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>>On Sun, 2004-03-28 at
]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 8:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH with vchkpw
Hi Jeremy,
At 15:10 28.03.04 -0600, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 14:52, Werner Amon wrote:
>> >
>> >QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
>> >
ssage-
From: Erwin Hoffmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH
Hi,
dont use the version 0.32 of the smtp-auth patch; it's not gonna work
with
vpopmail 5.4.x.
Read: http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smt
Hi Jeremy,
At 15:10 28.03.04 -0600, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 14:52, Werner Amon wrote:
>> >
>> >QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
>> >
>> >NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
>
>[required post trimming]
>
>> >exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1000 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v
-R -l
>> >"$LOCAL
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 14:52, Werner Amon wrote:
> >
> >QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
> >
> >NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
[required post trimming]
> >exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 1000 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -l
> >"$LOCAL" -u $QMAILDUID -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" -g "$NOFILESGID"
>
Thank you.
Thanks,
Chris Miller
Compuville
www.compuville.net
-Original Message-
From: Werner Amon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH with vchkpw
Chris Miller schrieb:
>Below is the "run"
Chris Miller schrieb:
Below is the "run" script that supervise uses for qmail-smtpd. Notice now it
uses /bin/checkpassword which is patched for MySQL support. However, I'm
moving to vchkpw, so how would I go about changing the script so that SMTP
AUTH will work?
[/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd
Below is the “run” script that supervise uses
for qmail-smtpd. Notice now it uses /bin/checkpassword which is patched for MySQL
support. However, I’m moving to vchkpw, so how would I go about changing the
script so that SMTP AUTH will work?
[/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd]# cat run
#
: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH
It is my understanding that :
MYSQL CONNECTION SETTINGS FOR VPOPMAIL
Line 1 defines the connection to use for database reads,
Line 2 defines the connection to use for database updates/writes.
If you omit line 2, then the same settings will be
used for both read
TCP/IP to connect to the server.
Michael.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:43 AM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH
> Nope, Same problem.
>
> Is there any way to have it use
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH
try changing the 0 in the file to 3306 like
localhost|3306|vpopmail|pass|vpopmail
Shouldn't have any effect but who knows. I have also had
issues where ive needed to connect to the ip of the machine
rather than localhost due to a few
file sometimes fixes that one too.
Shane
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, 28 March 2004 3:24 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH
>
>Nope, same error...
>
>-rw-r-1 vpopmai
: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH
does mysql -D vpopmail -user=vpopmail --password=pass get you in as well?
Im guessing you might need to escape the \+ sign or your permissions on the
vpopmail.mysql file are wrong.
-rw-r-1 vpopmail vchkpw235 Sep 4 2003 vpopmail.mysql
Shane.
>-Origi
Yes, it does get me in. Let me try escaping the "+".
Thanks,
Chris Miller
Compuville
www.compuville.net
-Original Message-
From: Shane Chrisp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH
does mysql -
t;From: Chris Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, 28 March 2004 3:04 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH
>
>Is it safe to use 0.31 with vpopmail-5.4.0?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Chris Miller
>Compuville
>www.compuville.net
>
>
>
Is it safe to use 0.31 with vpopmail-5.4.0?
Thanks,
Chris Miller
Compuville
www.compuville.net
-Original Message-
From: Erwin Hoffmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH
Hi,
dont
telnet result:
220 ssigno_back.local -=NO UNSOLICITED BULK E-MAIL=- ESMTP
ehlo
250-ssigno_back.local -=NO UNSOLICITED BULK E-MAIL=-
250-AUTH=LOGIN
250-PIPELINING
250 8BITMIME
auth login
334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
test
334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6
signo
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 09:48, signo wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 09:48, signo wrote:
> sorry ... the message is
>
> An error occured while sending mail. The mail server responded:
> VXNIcm5hbWU6. Please verify
> that your email address is correct in your Mail preferences and try again
you typed it rather than pasting it, and what you typ
sorry ... the message is
An error occured while sending mail. The mail server responded:
VXNIcm5hbWU6. Please verify
that your email address is correct in your Mail preferences and try again
signo wrote:
hello, i've configured the smtp authentication but now i have this
problem.
when i try to
hello, i've configured the smtp authentication but now i have this problem.
when i try to send a mail from mozilla client (or other clients) i have
always this message:
but userName and passwd are ok.
telnet ssigno_back 25
250-ssigno_back.local -=NO UNSOLICITED BULK E-MAIL=-
250-AUTH=LOGI
Hi,
dont use the version 0.32 of the smtp-auth patch; it's not gonna work with
vpopmail 5.4.x.
Read: http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
regards.
--eh.
At 14:38 22.03.04 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Am Mo, 2004-03-22 um 14.30 schrieb Chris Miller:
>> Does vpopmail come with SMTP AUTH?
hello, i want to set up smtp-auth with virtualhost, the link'
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/' can help me ?
i have to change something here (cut & paste from
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/) ?
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
/usr/local/b
On Mar 22, 2004, at 6:30 AM, Chris Miller wrote:
Does vpopmail come with SMTP AUTH? Is there a compatable patch out
there?
There is an SMTP AUTH patch in the contrib directory of vpopmail 5.4.0
and later.
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http:
Am Mo, 2004-03-22 um 14.30 schrieb Chris Miller:
> Does vpopmail come with SMTP AUTH? Is there a compatable patch out
> there?
Try this one:
qmail-smtpd-auth, http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/,
Gruss,
Peter.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], gpg -key
http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/
Does vpopmail come with SMTP AUTH? Is there a compatable
patch out there?
Thanks,
Chris Miller
Compuville
www.compuville.net
TECTED]
> Skickat: den 11 mars 2004 14:21
> Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ämne: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH vpopmail mysql qmail
>
>
> Hi all.
> I have installed a box with qmail, vpopmail, courier imap and mysql.
> Things run smoothly except I don't know how to get the SMTP
> AUTH to wo
Hi all.
I have installed a box with qmail, vpopmail, courier imap and mysql.
Things run smoothly except I don't know how to get the SMTP AUTH to work.
I want the auth-check to be done from the mysql db I use with vpopmail.
I assume this has been discussed before on the list and I hope someone may
Okay, I've been trying for years to get vchkpw/vpopmail to work with
SMTP-AUTH & CRAM-MD5. Thanks to recent development, it's apparently
possible now. After beating my head against it for 2 hours this
morning, I decided to turn to this list for help...
Then, I solved my own damn problem by real
Title: RE: [vchkpw] Smtp Auth with VPopmail
Thanks for the inf I have it setup right now. I have one last problem. When I do authenticate through smtp auth, it can't find the user. Here is the log entry:
Feb 13 02:14:59 cssimsp0 vpopmail[21457]: [ID 997931 mail.notice] vchkpw
On Feb 12, 2004, at 3:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One question. Does smtp auth force users to authenticate when using
smtp or does it just provide the option to authenticate? I am able to
send email through smtp without authenticating. If I try to
authenticate through smtp, it will do tha
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 16:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One question. Does smtp auth force users to authenticate when using
> smtp or does it just provide the option to authenticate? I am able to
> send email through smtp without authenticating. If I try to
> authenticate through smtp, it will d
Title: RE: [vchkpw] Smtp Auth with VPopmail
One question. Does smtp auth force users to authenticate when using smtp or does it just provide the option to authenticate? I am able to send email through smtp without authenticating. If I try to authenticate through smtp, it will do that also
Title: RE: [vchkpw] Smtp Auth with VPopmail
Ok. I am getting closer to having smtp auth working with qmail and vpopmail. I patched qmail with the qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2 at http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html. I upgraded to vpopmail 5.4.0, which has the vchkpw.c patch included. I have
On Feb 11, 2004, at 8:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if I wanted to set this up in inetd.conf, it would look something
like this?
#smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /opt/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
I'm not sure how you'd set it up in inetd.conf.
Title: RE: [vchkpw] Smtp Auth with VPopmail
So if I wanted to set this up in inetd.conf, it would look something like this?
#smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env tcp-env /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd /opt/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
-Original Message-
From: Tom Collins
On Feb 10, 2004, at 11:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone using an smtp auth solution with vchkpw authentication? Or,
can you point me in a good direction. I have looked at all the smtp
auth solutions on the qmail.org site. None of them seem to support
vchkpw. Any help would be apprec
Is anyone using an smtp
auth solution with vchkpw authentication? Or, can you point me in a good
direction. I have looked at all the
smtp auth solutions on the
qmail.org site. None of them seem
to support vchkpw. Any help would be appreciated.
If there isn't a good smtp auth solutio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Notice:*/ The information contained in this message may be
privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communica
101 - 200 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
