Charles J. Boening wrote:
Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
is there any way to run chkusr on these 'gateway' MX servers? i use
MySQL authentication. The mysql server is the pop server, and i
replicate that on the primary MX (where the majority of mail comes
in). is there any way to 'hook' into the
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Jason Wilkinson wrote:
This is was thinking about doing. I'm not sure why everybody is replicating
the database and mail structure when you can just export it via NFS
(assuming you're on the local net) and be reading live data.
Its not a good idea because if your primary
Ajai Khattri wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Jason Wilkinson wrote:
This is was thinking about doing. I'm not sure why everybody is
replicating the database and mail structure when you can just export
it via NFS (assuming you're on the local net) and be reading live
data.
Its not a good
On Monday 14 February 2005 12:11 pm, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
I'm a little confused about implementation of chkusr. i really want to
implement it, as i'm tired of my paid bandwidth being chewed up by spammers
sending tens of thousands of messages to non-existent addresses.
instead of having
Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
is there any way to run chkusr on these 'gateway' MX servers? i use
MySQL authentication. The mysql server is the pop server, and i
replicate that on the primary MX (where the majority of mail comes
in). is there any way to 'hook' into the authentication info in the
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:11 AM, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
but reading the docs, it appears i have to install vpopmail on the
server that's going to run chkusr, and i don't much like the idea of
that. i'm a tad worried that i might suddenly find all incoming
messages being delivered to 'local'
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
but reading the docs, it appears i have to install vpopmail on the server
that's going to run chkusr, and i don't much like the idea of that. i'm a tad
worried that i might suddenly find all incoming messages being delivered to
'local' and going
At 10:42 AM 2/14/2005, you wrote:
You could try one of the goodrcptto patches to qmail-smtpd.
We have one we use for gateways to exchange servers.
Basicly, you export a list of users to a file. Put that file on the
gateway machines. With our patch we build a goodrcptto.cdb file.
Then qmail-smtpd
Ken Jones wrote:
You could try one of the goodrcptto patches to qmail-smtpd.
We have one we use for gateways to exchange servers.
Basicly, you export a list of users to a file. Put that file on the
gateway machines. With our patch we build a goodrcptto.cdb file.
Then qmail-smtpd checks the cdb
Paul,
I would think you're ok putting vpopmail on your gateway servers.
Remember, the CHKUSR patch is only checking that the user exists to
vpopmail. I take it you're using the smtproutes file to forward to the
real server behind the gateway boxes? If so, you should be just fine.
It's not going
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
is there any way to run chkusr on these 'gateway' MX servers? i use MySQL
authentication. The mysql server is the pop server, and i replicate that on
the primary MX (where the majority of mail comes in). is there any way to
'hook' into the
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Jason Wilkinson wrote:
2) the file system (to check the
~qmail/control files and .qmail- files for aliases and catchalls)
rsync is your friend ;-)
--
We are doing exactly this with our gateway MX server. First we replicate
the MySQL database then we use rsync running every 30 minutes to just sync
the first couple of directory levels from
the /home/vpopmail/domains/x/domain.com on the vpopmail server (this picks
up the aliases, mailing
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 12:01 PM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] chkusr on gateway mx?
Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
is there any way to run chkusr on these 'gateway' MX servers? i use
MySQL authentication. The mysql server is the pop server, and i
thanks to everyone for the insights. while i still think it's kind of
'ugly' to have to replicate a portion of the vpopmail directory structure
on my MXes, i suppose the benefits will surely outweigh the 'ugliness'.
At 03:07 PM 2/14/2005, you wrote:
We are doing exactly this with our gateway
15 matches
Mail list logo
